Amish belief about baptism...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ceil-1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m pretty sure that the Catholic Church forbids this. You can’t baptize infants if the parents are not willing. And I think they (the Catholic Church, not the Amish) are right on this. The child’s spiritual life is the parents’ responsibility, not yours. The idea that we have to run around saving other people’s children is, in my opinion, one of the things that makes Christians (particularly evangelicals) rightly disliked throughout the world. It’s understandably seen as a form of preying on the innocent.

God can take care of children. We don’t need to use coercive or dishonest methods in order to do His work for Him.

Edwin
I researched this years ago after learning of the Mortara case.

While it is true that the Catholic church forbids baptizing children that will not be raised Catholics, once it is done, they are regarded as bonafide Catholics, due to the (in Catholic belief) indelible nature of the sacrament.
 
I don’t defend this, but the director was not lying from a traditional Catholic perspective. Or, for that matter, from a Jewish perspective. Don’t Jews believe that to become Christian is to cease to be Jewish?

It is precisely this belief (that identity depends on baptism, not race) that both motivated and enabled these Catholics to protect these children from the murderous intent of the Nazis. That does not justify what they did. It was manipulative and wrong.

Edwin
From a traditional Jewish viewpoint, a Jew who apostatsizes remains a Jew. But they are comparable to a Catholic priest who has been defrocked.

He remains a priest but cannot carry out his former duties. Similarly, a Jew who apostasizes remains a Jew, but cannot enjoy the privileges of it (such as being married by a rabbi, being buried in a synagogue,receiving an aliyah to the Torah, etc)

Judaism has always taught, “The Jew who sins remains a Jew”. Catholicism also teaches that once a person is baptized Catholic, they remain a Catholic. If they apostasize and later choose to return to the church, they only need go to confession.

A Jew who apostasizes, if he decides to return to Judaism, only needs to return to the practice and give up his former beliefs (though some rabbis also require an immersion in the mikvah to cleans him ritually/spiritually from his former spiritual uncleanness.)

BTW while I realize that in the eyes of the (Catholic) orphanage director the children were Catholics, in the eyes of the rabbi they were Jews, since both faiths believe once you belong to them you remain part of them forever.

It was this very fact that enabled Catholics in the Middle Ages to claim that they were not persecuting Jews, but “Catholics” (because the Spanish Inquisition went after Jews who had forcibly become Catholics.) They were no longer seen as Jews, but as Catholics who had engaged in “heretical” practices.
 
It means a lot to Jews. It means fire and sword. It means centuries of coercion and humiliation. It means a religion that has taken the Jewish Scriptures and basic Jewish concepts, turned them upside down and inside out, and used them to attack Judaism.

Infant baptism also means many of the same things to Anabaptists.

Edwin
Thank you so much for that very correct explanation! And yes, the Anabaptists were also persecuted in Europe by the Catholic church, so for them, the feelings about infant baptism or forced baptism is almost the same! (gee, I wonder if that’s why I always felt a bond with the Old Order Amish??)
 
You can’t judge all practicing Catholics based on what a few might do. I think that the OP’s opinion is rare and it goes against Church teaching on this issue. And you can’t justify your belief in religious discrimination in the present because of past mistakes of the Church.
Well, I have to quite frank with you, if I needed a nanny or babysitter, and I KNEW one who applied to work for me was a “fanatical” type who felt as the OP, I certainly would not hire her.

Any sitter who would work for me would need to be very familiar with Jewish dietary laws anyway (to use my kitchen), and I’m sure few Catholics would fit that requirement.
 
Just having a little fun here. What do you think about this in regards to Anglicanism{Episcopalian, and every other denomination and non-denomination}:

It means a lot to Catholics. It means fire and sword. It means centuries of coercion and humiliation. It means a religion that has taken the Catholic Scriptures and basic Catholic concepts, turned them upside down and inside out, and used them to attack Catholicism.
You have a point with regard to Anglicans–this is particularly acute for English and Irish Catholics (though of course I recognize that Catholic solidarity applies across the board). . There were also two Catholics executed in Scotland, according to one source I’ve read (I’ve been unable to find out more about them). However, for the most part Continental Protestant traditions did not *lethally *persecute Catholics. Some Carmelites (I think) were massacred in the Netherlands, and of course there was lots of mob violence and religious warfare in which both sides were guilty. But large-scale government-sponsored violent persecution of Catholics was, as far as I know, confined to England (as a political unit–obviously the English ruled Ireland and persecuted Catholics there). And of course the free-church Protestantism that dominates America rejects church-state alliances and religious persecution as a matter of principle.

That being said, there are of course many other reasons why Catholics resent Protestantism, and many of them are legitimate.

Edwin
 
Thank you so much for that very correct explanation! And yes, the Anabaptists were also persecuted in Europe by the Catholic church, so for them, the feelings about infant baptism or forced baptism is almost the same! (gee, I wonder if that’s why I always felt a bond with the Old Order Amish??)
:confused: You said it means nothing, and now you say it means what was posted by the OP :confused:
 
I am no fanatic. I am actually quite open about religous beliefs. I think you are overreacting.

Baptizing in the danger of death is not against Catholic teaching. I never said anything about baptizing another person’s child against their will under other circumstances. That’s their problem. I can still pray for all involved. But, there are times when action must take its place. We should baptize conditionally, by the way.

And, as far as persecution of the Jews goes, there are two sides to every story. Jews as a community, particularly orthodox and Hasidic, can be quite nasty to those who are not their own. I cared for these types in the hospital. Of course this is a generalization, but, it is part of their rules to shun us Goy. They could learn a lesson about politeness from the Amish.

It is quite known that they attempted to infiltrate the Church to destroy it from the inside. They also collaborated with the Muslims in Spain. The retaliation against the general community was harsh, indeed. But, those were different times, and we cannot judge any of it from today’s standards except to regret what was done. It was an emotional response to a desperate situation. (You’ll recall Japanese internment camps). People are fallible, emotional, and prone to cruelty with each other- especially when it comes to retaliation for a percieved wrong. This goes along with the teaching of my religion. My religion says I must show mercy. I must forgive, even to the point of allowing myself to die at the hands of an evil person.

Satanic rituals are not performed for the good of the person involved. That is not even close to a valid analogy. Try to look past the ceremony of it to the intention behind it.

I read the thread about the JW woman. You must forgive her. I know this is not part of your religion. It just proves my point. Only a loving heart would find its way to putting this aside after taking the proper steps, which have been done. I realize you are reacting in grief. But, your need to lash out and retaliate reminds me of that hideous Stephen King, going after that poor sap who hit him on the road. Where’s the love? I repeat, where’s the love?

Put it aside or your anger and hatred will consume you. You should feel sorry for her miserable condition and pray for her, and wish only for her ultimate good. That is what a Child of God is supposed to do. :harp:
 
:confused: You said it means nothing, and now you say it means what was posted by the OP :confused:
It means nothing to Jews and Anabaptists SPIRITUALLY, but it can be darn offensive to have someone else’s religious beliefs forced upon you.
 
I am no fanatic. I am actually quite open about religous beliefs. I think you are overreacting.

Baptizing in the danger of death is not against Catholic teaching. I never said anything about baptizing another person’s child against their will under other circumstances. That’s their problem. I can still pray for all involved. But, there are times when action must take its place. We should baptize conditionally, by the way.

And, as far as persecution of the Jews goes, there are two sides to every story. Jews as a community, particularly orthodox and Hasidic, can be quite nasty to those who are not their own. I cared for these types in the hospital. Of course this is a generalization, but, it is part of their rules to shun us Goy. They could learn a lesson about politeness from the Amish.

It is quite known that they attempted to infiltrate the Church to destroy it from the inside. They also collaborated with the Muslims in Spain. The retaliation against the general community was harsh, indeed. But, those were different times, and we cannot judge any of it from today’s standards except to regret what was done. It was an emotional response to a desperate situation. (You’ll recall Japanese internment camps). People are fallible, emotional, and prone to cruelty with each other- especially when it comes to retaliation for a percieved wrong. This goes along with the teaching of my religion. My religion says I must show mercy. I must forgive, even to the point of allowing myself to die at the hands of an evil person.

Satanic rituals are not performed for the good of the person involved. That is not even close to a valid analogy. Try to look past the ceremony of it to the intention behind it.

I read the thread about the JW woman. You must forgive her. I know this is not part of your religion. It just proves my point. Only a loving heart would find its way to putting this aside after taking the proper steps, which have been done. I realize you are reacting in grief. But, your need to lash out and retaliate reminds me of that hideous Stephen King, going after that poor sap who hit him on the road. Where’s the love? I repeat, where’s the love?

Put it aside or your anger and hatred will consume you. You should feel sorry for her miserable condition and pray for her, and wish only for her ultimate good. That is what a Child of God is supposed to do. :harp:
You made so many generalizations and blatant mistakes, I have no idea where to begin!

As for religious Jews “shunning the goy”, excuse me? If that were the case, I’d have to shun half my family, all of my husband’s family, and the families of many Chasidic and Orthodox Jews I know. Do you know why?

Because my mother converted to Judaism from Catholicism, my husband converted to Judaism from the Baptist faith originally, and MANY Chasidic and Orthodox Jews I know are converts to Judaism, which means ALL their families are Gentiles!

There are MANY Gentiles who have converted to Judaism, and do you really think they are taught to hate their own family??

As for forgiveness “not being part of your religion”, holy cow, lady! Do you know ANYTHING AT ALL about how your own religion got started, and what religion is derives FROM?

Do you know what Yom Kippur is? Do you know that we Jews MUST forgive others or God does not forgive us?

Forgiveness is CENTRAL to Judaism, in so many ways!

As for that JW woman, she broke Federal law. Do you have any conception of what that means?

And she was fired not by me, but my her employers, who, incidentally, happen to be Christians (or so they said.)

And as for the Jews who became Catholics in the Middle Ages, you now accuse them of having joined to destroy the church from within? Do you know ANYTHING about history at all?

They were FORCED to join the Catholic religion, they joined only to save their lives! Do you think being forced to join made them love your religion or your god? I really don’t think so!

You know, we Jews can never win. When we’re forced to join a religion under threat of death, and then when the conversions don’t work out (gee, wonder why not?), WE are somehow to blame!

Listen, do us a favor: forget about trying to ‘save our souls’, and that way, we’ll BOTH be safe and happy…from each other.

You speak as if you are full of love, but I can tell the hate for Jews coming through what you said, because you espoused some of the same things that some traditionalist Catholics say, about “the Judeo-Masonic conspiracy”, when you falsely accused Jews of infiltrating the church to ruin it.

As nice as some Christians appear on the surface, the real deal is just underneath, waiting to burst forth.
 
As nice as some Christians appear on the surface, the real deal is just underneath, waiting to burst forth.
You’ve got that straight. I’ve never had a better education about what lies just beneath Catholicism. I’m glad I found this site.
 
You’ve got that straight. I’ve never had a better education about what lies just beneath Catholicism. I’m glad I found this site.
I too have been surprised by what I have learned here…just beneath the surface.
 
You’ve got that straight. I’ve never had a better education about what lies just beneath Catholicism. I’m glad I found this site.
Kinda reminds me of the saying the Native Americans supposedly had, about the white man speaking with a forked tongue…

And yes, I feel the same way about this forum. I’m really glad I found it for the same reason you are! The thing too many clueless people don’t realize it, the Catholic church changed quite a bit externally, but the beliefs remain the same. Apparently, that includes some of the attitudes.

The whole thing is really a shame, because on moral issues, I agree almost 100% with the Catholic religion.
 
Kinda reminds me of the saying the Native Americans supposedly had, about the white man speaking with a forked tongue…

And yes, I feel the same way about this forum. I’m really glad I found it for the same reason you are! The thing too many clueless people don’t realize it, the Catholic church changed quite a bit externally, but the beliefs remain the same. Apparently, that includes some of the attitudes.

The whole thing is really a shame, because on moral issues, I agree almost 100% with the Catholic religion.
In a way I’ve found it a shame too. I don’t agree with a whole lot of Catholic dogma, but I know a whole lot of Catholics who are lovely people. I find myself second-guessing them now.
 
In a way I’ve found it a shame too. I don’t agree with a whole lot of Catholic dogma, but I know a whole lot of Catholics who are lovely people. I find myself second-guessing them now.
It seems you and I have had a similar experience, because I have been second-guessing them too! And I have known some really decent Catholics in my lifetime too, esp. the late John Cardinal O’Connor.

BTW why does it read “epikoros” over that cat’s pic in your sig line?
 
It seems you and I have had a similar experience, because I have been second-guessing them too! And I have known some really decent Catholics in my lifetime too, esp. the late John Cardinal O’Connor.

BTW why does it read “epikoros” over that cat’s pic in your sig line?
'cuz Lamar is an Epicurean (and a heretic too) 🙂
 
Kinda reminds me of the saying the Native Americans supposedly had, about the white man speaking with a forked tongue…

And yes, I feel the same way about this forum. I’m really glad I found it for the same reason you are! The thing too many clueless people don’t realize it, the Catholic church changed quite a bit externally, but the beliefs remain the same. Apparently, that includes some of the attitudes.

The whole thing is really a shame, because on moral issues, I agree almost 100% with the Catholic religion.
I don’t understand why you and LaMar jump to the wild conclusion that most Catholics agree with the folks on this forum. (I don’t see this forum as darkly as you do, but that’s not the point.) Why do these folks congregate on the Internet? Because they’re an embattled minority in their own parishes. You are simply pulling out old stereotypes about Roman duplicity with your ominous language of 'beneath the surface." This website isn’t “beneath the surface” at all. It’s very public and very noisy. What is “beneath the surface” is the vast ocean of regular old Catholicism bubbling away in thousands of parishes.

Why on earth would you assume that because folks on here sometimes say nasty things, therefore most Catholics agree with them? Do you normally assume that Internet websites are typical of people you would meet in the “real world”? Are you really that naive?

Edwin
 
It means nothing to Jews and Anabaptists SPIRITUALLY, but it can be darn offensive to have someone else’s religious beliefs forced upon you.
I already conceded the point to offensiveness. Nothing is being forced upon you, the parent, or, the child, because nothing happened.
 
Kinda reminds me of the saying the Native Americans supposedly had, about the white man speaking with a forked tongue…

Freedom of religion? Until relatively recently, Native Americans were prohibited from practicing thier indigenous religions-- such practices were a criminal act. The boarding schools were run to convert the Native children to Christianity. As BlackHawk once said, (paraphrased), there are many good things about Christianity, but Christians DEMAND that we believe exactly as they do. I have the right to adapt those beliefs to my culture, and if they then call me non-Christian, then so be it. (Actually, this attitude was learned from one of his close friends)

Many Catholics, acculturated to the larger American culture, bought into this mind-set (of assimilation through forced conversion), which is in opposition to Catholic doctrine.

The thing too many clueless people don’t realize it, the Catholic church changed quite a bit externally, but the beliefs remain the same. Apparently, that includes some of the attitudes.

You have to remember that when churches change, it takes a while, sometimes a long while, for the individuals within the church from changing. I remember an advertisement about herdsmen (like cowboys or shepherds) who were herding cats. Can you imagine a herd of cats? :rotfl: And, like one person pointed out, this herd of cats is even more diverse, not a representative sample of the population.
As to if I were a caretaker of an unbaptized child in immediate danger of death, I honestly don’t know what I would do.
 
Correction:
You have to remember that when churches change, it takes a while, sometimes a long while, for the individuals within the church to change their beliefs/practices in response.

The Catholic Church openly admits to its past errors. Some other churches would do anything to cover up their past errors/misdeeds, and those of their members. That, in itself, continues those past errors.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top