Amoris laetitia heresy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Struggling1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Anicette said:
yes. Civil divorce+ civil remarriage with sexual intercourses = no Eucharist and no absolution
Click to expand...
Yup. It’s all about the sex. Divorced Catholics who do not remarry and/or who live celibate lives after their divorce can remain in full communion with the Catholic Church. But divorced Catholics who remarry and/or live in a sexual relationship with a new partner after their divorce cannot. Unless, of course, they get an annulment.
 
godisgood77 said:
I’m sorry, but you are mistaken. AL certainly does not promote heresy
Click to expand...
You choose your side. I’ll choose mine. I’ve read the document and I’ve compared it with what John Paul II and the Church constantly taught. I’ll keep the Faith as its always been and I’ll pray for Pope Francis.
 
What is even more troubling is that Pope Francis has affirmed, in a letter to the Argentine Bishops ( a letter now published in the “Acta Apostolica Sedes”), the most liberal interpretation of AL concerning Holy Communion for adulterers.
 
Last edited:
This thread is not about me. I prefer not to discuss my situation other than to say that it was found, by the competent authority, that mine and my husband’s rights within Canon law were violated.
It is my hope that with the guidance issued in AL things like that will never happen again.
 
Can you shed any light on what was “unpastoral”?
 
Last edited:
The part about having my rights under Canon law violated by a priest doesn’t strike you as “unpastoral”?
 
To be honest, I have heard so many things and negative comments on pastoral laxness that I don’t want to even read this Pastoral Letter. Which is a sin. 😔

Strong positions of morality, sex and pro-life isn’t Pope Francis priority.
 
“What God hath joined let no man put asunder”

Our Lord Himself said those words. What is it that confuses you about those words?
 
Last edited:
I’m not sure I follow.
My situation is irrelevant.
A pastoral approach to complicated issues does not mean that we allow people to sin. It means we don’t use a “cookie cutter approach” to unique situations that are really no one’s business except for the people involved and their pastor.

Why is this so difficult for so many people to understand?
 
Matthew 16:19: “I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.”

Our Lord Himself said those words. What is it that confuses you about those words?
 
No, it is not.
And it is not just adultery that is addressed in AL.

In a time where many people do not go into marriage believing it to be permanent, and where catechesis regarding marriage is abysmal, at best, culpability is not so black & white anymore.

That is why AL is so necessary.
 
Last edited:
godisgood77 said:
Matthew 16:19: “I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.”

Our Lord Himself said those words.
Click to expand...
Mild correction: the author of the gospel according to Matthew says Our Lord spoke those words. I wasn’t present. Were you?
 
No… I was not present…

Do you believe the Bible to be inspired?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top