J
JimR-OCDS
Guest
I’ll take a look tomorrow.That’s true. This guy, even though he is very good, isn’t infallible. He’s still a very good speaker, and similar to watching EWTN, it’s helpful to watch his videos
Jim
I’ll take a look tomorrow.That’s true. This guy, even though he is very good, isn’t infallible. He’s still a very good speaker, and similar to watching EWTN, it’s helpful to watch his videos
I saw in one of MV’s videos that he correctly denounced this false notion. Because, as you probably know, it is spiritually dangerous to teach such a notion. Just wanted to point out that although you may not like his delivery, the content of his messages seem authentic to me.No, not all men will be saved.
As Pop John Paul II said, God doesn’t send souls to hell, they go there on their own.
Keep in mind who Christ gave the authority to teach His Church.
Jim
Pope John Paul II spoke falsely and Michael Voris spoke correctly on souls going to hell ?I saw in one of MV’s videos that he correctly denounced this false notion. Because, as you probably know, it is spiritually dangerous to teach such a notion. Just wanted to point out that although you may not like his delivery, the content of his messages seem authentic to me.
I haven’t seen him be aggressive towards individuals suffering from SSA, but merely hating the sin that these people commit. Is there something wrong with hating sin?
Wait, what, no.Pope John Paul II spoke falsely and Michael Voris spoke correctly on souls going to hell ?
WOW!
Jim
OK, it wasn’t I misread, but you responded to my post on what Pope John Paul II said and you wrote that Michael Voris responded to this false notion. It made me think you were referring to Pope John Paul II’s statement.Wait, what, no.
Neither spoke falsely, they agree with each other. I don’t know if you misread, but the false notion that Michael Voris correctly denounced is the concept of us having a reasonable expectation that all men will be saved.
I bring up this example to show that of what I can tell Voris having an adequate grasp on Catholic theology. He seems to aggressively denounce this spiritually damaging notion.
…did St. John Paul the Great support the notion that we have a reasonable expectation that all men will be saved…?
Do you think we should disregard his message simply because we don’t agree with his tone of rhetoric?OK, it wasn’t I misread, but you responded to my post on what Pope John Paul II said and you wrote that Michael Voris responded to this false notion. It made me think you were referring to Pope John Paul II’s statement.
I won’t bother going on with this, but Michael Voris was in trouble his how Bishop in what he taught, and the tone of his rhetoric. It was long time ago and I had thought he had shut down his website, but all he did is rename it.
Jim
He doesn’t have the credentials and authority given by the Church to teach which is the main problem in addition to the tone of his rhetoric.Do you think we should disregard his message simply because we don’t agree with his tone of rhetoric?