An Exorcist Explains the Demonic

  • Thread starter Thread starter Richard_White
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
As a leading Church expert on exorcisms, who worked in this area all day every day for years, I wouldn’t doubt that Fr. Amorth got called in to consult or help with a great many cases.
At the same time, publishing hype is publishing hype, and the man has passed away.
So I would not be too focused on a number in blurb text.

Edited to add, I note also this information from the Wiki article on Fr. Amorth:

*In October 2000, it was reported he had performed over 50,000 exorcisms (which ranged from “a few minutes” to “several hours” in length).[4] In March 2010, he said that the number had increased to 70,000 . By May 2013 he said he had performed 160,000 exorcisms in the course of his ministry.[6] Note that according to Father Amorth, each exorcism does not represent a victim of possession, but rather each exorcism is counted as a prayer or ritual alone, and some possession victims required hundreds of exorcisms.[7]

Edward Peters, a professor of canon law, finds Amorth’s claim to have personally performed 30000 exorcisms over 90 years “astounding”. Even accepting Amorth’s claim that only 94 of his 30000 exorcisms represented full-blown possession, that would have required roughly one case a month to be thoroughly examined and processed over nine years with hardly a break.[8] Amorth believes that a person may be possessed by more than one demon at once, sometimes numbering in the thousands, which is what accounts for the high number of reputed demons exorcised.*
 
Another conclusion that can be drawn from this data is that demons only exist in the minds of believers.
*The finest trick of the devil is to persuade you he doesn’t exist. *—Charles Baudelaire

Sure, you can believe the devil doesn’t exist. But what are the results if you are wrong? Whereas for me, who believes, what are the results if I am wrong?

You can treat all this spiritual stuff as a plaything, an equivalent of playing Santa Claus of the Easter Bunny, but what is the point? You call yourself some type of Catholic, well, isn’t that special? You can be just like the man CS Lewis describes in Screwtape: more spiritual than your secular friends, and more sophisticated than your spiritual friends. Best of both worlds.

But if you do not take it seriously, you are for sure harming yourself. You are killing the part of you that searches for truth, you are deadening your conscience, you are blunting your intellect. And you are putting your soul in danger of an eternity in Hell, which is very unpleasant.
 
As a leading Church expert on exorcisms, who worked in this area all day every day for years, I wouldn’t doubt that Fr. Amorth got called in to consult or help with a great many cases.
At the same time, publishing hype is publishing hype, and the man has passed away.
So I would not be too focused on a number in blurb text.

Edited to add, I note also this information from the Wiki article on Fr. Amorth:

*In October 2000, it was reported he had performed over 50,000 exorcisms (which ranged from “a few minutes” to “several hours” in length).[4] In March 2010, he said that the number had increased to 70,000 . By May 2013 he said he had performed 160,000 exorcisms in the course of his ministry.[6] Note that according to Father Amorth, each exorcism does not represent a victim of possession, but rather each exorcism is counted as a prayer or ritual alone, and some possession victims required hundreds of exorcisms.[7]

Edward Peters, a professor of canon law, finds Amorth’s claim to have personally performed 30000 exorcisms over 90 years “astounding”. Even accepting Amorth’s claim that only 94 of his 30000 exorcisms represented full-blown possession, that would have required roughly one case a month to be thoroughly examined and processed over nine years with hardly a break.[8] Amorth believes that a person may be possessed by more than one demon at once, sometimes numbering in the thousands, which is what accounts for the high number of reputed demons exorcised.*
Our idea of exorcisms comes from the movies, where full-blown exorcisms are described. However, the vast majority of exorcisms, according to exorcists, are minor exorcisms, requiring varying amounts of time and effort. Some people may need to visit the exorcist more than once, some only once; these minor exorcisms do not need the investigation that a major exorcism requires.

Think if a novelist claimed to have written 2000 written works in a years, then consider that an email counts as a written work, and how much emails can vary…
 
Shamskrambadosh is even better at it. Nobody believes in that guy.

If I am wrong, then I will be slightly annoyed that no demons appeared when I tried to summon them. If you are wrong, then you will have wasted part of your life on an irrational fear.
Not at all. If you are wrong, you may spend eternity in Hell. If I am wrong, I will have spent the last half of my life trying to do good.

I do not fear the devil as I know that God is more powerful than he is, and I know what to do about him if he comes around.
My search for truth is different than yours, but it’s no less serious. If I ever manage to summon a demon to visible appearance, you’ll be the first to know.
I hope you find the truth. And if you manage to summon a demon (are you actually trying to?), I hope you will contact a priest before you let me know!
 
I am less afraid of an eternity in Hell than you are of the devil. And you can do good without believing in demons.
There are limits to what I on my own can do, and my belief system does include the existence of demons. Why would I refuse to believe what God tells us?
I’ve been trying to summon demons with no success. That’s why I don’t believe they exist outside of the imagination.
:lol: My dog doesn’t come to me when I call her, either. Maybe I should stop believing in her?

I’ve already told you the best way to get the attention of demons. They are extremely selfish, and don’t do anything they don’t have to or for which they aren’t going to get something.
 
I am less afraid of an eternity in Hell than you are of the devil. And you can do good without believing in demons.

I’ve been trying to summon demons with no success. That’s why I don’t believe they exist outside of the imagination.
You are learning the truth about demons, not the truth about their existence, but the truth about their willingness to be summoned.

Demons have free will and man has no power to command them to appear. They will sometimes respond, but only when it serves their agenda.
 
Thanks for the suggestion OP, I just read a similar book. Very interesting. So if one decided to obtain an exorcism, what’s a legitimate way to obtain one? I’d assume that this guy is pretty busy.
 
Thanks for the suggestion OP, I just read a similar book. Very interesting. So if one decided to obtain an exorcism, what’s a legitimate way to obtain one? I’d assume that this guy is pretty busy.
Hi, presuming that this thread is still open, to answer your question: one would ask a priest. This is the most discreet way and also praying for one, throughout the time a person believes they require one. One can ask about but I think going to one’s parish priest is a solid first step. Or, if the worry is there that it might still be too close to home at one’s own parish, one can ring and ask priests from other towns. Also, if one went to Confession, then it might be the case, that a priest might suggest that this is the case, and if they did, then one might ask them how to go about getting help in that way.
 
I am less afraid of an eternity in Hell than you are of the devil. And you can do good without believing in demons.

I’ve been trying to summon demons with no success. That’s why I don’t believe they exist outside of the imagination.
There’s no magic formula or legalistic way for getting possessed. Why should you be able to summon one at will? And not all demonic influence results in possession. It can be very much more subtle.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top