An honest and simple question for Muslims

  • Thread starter Thread starter dzheremi
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
God wants all of his creation to LOVE ONE ANOTHER AS I LOVE YOU! That is why we care if Muslims, Hindu’s, Jews, and everyone loves us.
Christianity teaches that ALL of God’s creations should love one another, you say?

Well then, do Christians care if Satan loves them?

And do Christians love Satan?.. I really do suspect that many of them actually do.
As Christians, we care first and foremost about God love for us, but we also love and respect not only our Christian brothers and sisters, but EVERYONE else.
Muslims love others for the sake of Allah.

If Allah commands us to love someone, we will love that person… and if Allah commands us to NOT love someone, as in the case of Satan, then Muslims will not love that someone.
And we follow the 10 commandments, its in the bible, so we believe it is true, and we follow it as best as we humanly can.
It is NOT humanly possible for someone to willfully and constantly bow down to a statue without violating the Second Commandment.
But, as a muslim, do you think the 10 commandments are corrupt? You seem to claim the bible is corrupt, so does this include the 10 commandments?
Not all of the Bible has been corrupted, some of it remains true.

And how do Muslims know which parts of the scriptures have escaped coruption?

Simple… the parts of the Bible which conform to Al-Furqan (the Criterion) i.e. the Qur’an.
 
Hamba2han, I really find your latest posts in this thread to be very offensive. I am not bothered that you apparently do not understand why I created this thread, but to say that many Christians love satan is very wrong and a total perversion of God’s commandments that you claim to care so much about. I can’t stop you from posting in this thread or any other, but if that is the sort of contribution you wish to make then I would really like you to stay out of this thread, which is meant to be a respectful, serious, and honest examination on the role of love for others in Islam, and what that can tell us about Islam’s values.

If it is an Islamic value to reply to questions asked in a friendly and open manner by insulting the faith and values of the questioner, then I deeply regret even making this thread. Is this really how a Muslim should act when his neighbor or another curious party wants to ask him about his faith? You are making your faith look terrible. Wouldn’t Allah care about that? One of your fellow Muslims (Meedo) has already shown enough interest in how you present Islam’s values in this thread to correct you gently in the past. You should be thankful that other Muslims like Meedo and Sister Amy have posted in this thread far more curteously than you have (thank you, Meedo and Sister Amy), because frankly you are doing a very good job of showing us that there is truth to the stereotype that some Muslims absolutely hate Christianity and Christians, and use their claim as a continuant of the Abrahamic tradition as a means of tearing down their predecessors (Christians and Jews). How absolutely vile!

For the record, Hamba2han, I started this thread because I believe with all of my heart and soul in the truth of Jesus’ answer to the Pharisees in Matthew 22:37-40. There it is written:

He said to him, “You shall love the Lord, your God, with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind. This is the greatest and the first commandment. The second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. The whole law and the prophets depend on these two commandments.”

Do you notice that Jesus says that the second commandment is like the first? So that loving your neighbor is comparable to loving God. If I do not love you, then I am not capable of following the first commandment to the utmost, because to love others is a manifestation of my love for God. They are not one and the same (meaning, I don’t love any human as much as I love God or in the same way that I love God), but I am really not observing the first as well as I could if I am not observing the second at all. To be only observing half of two laws that work in concert in this manner is to not be faithful to the law itself, especially since all laws depend on these two commandments. What good is it if I follow the second of the ten commandments that you keep talking about if I do not follow the two commandments that JESUS talks about in the above passage? You cannot be only semi-faithful to the law. I cannot NOT love you and say honestly that I love the Lord with all of my heart, soul, and mind.

That is why I started this thread. It is an attempt to be faithful to the the teachings of Christ, like everything else I do.

And, no, I don’t love Satan. 😛
 
Christianity teaches that ALL of God’s creations should love one another, you say?

Well then, do Christians care if Satan loves them?
And do Christians love Satan?.. I really do suspect that many of them actually do.
Satan means lord of filth, lord of lies, lord of hate, lord of this world. Christians do not condone anything that teaches materialism, hatred, lies and filth.
Muslims love others for the sake of Allah.
“Love others” here means only the Muslims. When it comes to the kufr, do not take them as your friends, right?
If Allah commands us to love someone, we will love that person… and if Allah commands us to NOT love someone, as in the case of Satan, then Muslims will not love that someone.
Islam teaches taqiyya and kitman - doctrines found only in this religion. Mohammad condoned lying when pressured. So then, do Muslims not love themselves?
It is NOT humanly possible for someone to willfully and constantly bow down to a statue without violating the Second Commandment.
Exactly. So why do Muslims take the pilgrimage to Mecca, just to bow down before a giant stone, kiss it and make rounds?
Not all of the Bible has been corrupted, some of it remains true.
And how do Muslims know which parts of the scriptures have escaped coruption?
Simple… the parts of the Bible which conform to Al-Furqan (the Criterion) i.e. the Qur’an.
So some parts of the Bible are not corrupt, but its corrupt wherever the Qur’an teaches it is, because if the Bible is uncorrupted, it would render the teachings of Mohammad as false. Guess what this is called?:rolleyes:
 
I have to say that I think this whole discussion on whether or not Muslims love Christians rather frivolous.

I mean, why should Christians care whether or not Muslims love them?? :confused:

I can tell you one thing about Muslims in general i.e. they care infinitely more about how much Allah loves them than any kind of love and affection that they may receive from Christians… or from Hindus, Jews, Sikhs, Buddhists or any other group for that matter.

The problem here is that most Christians believe that the love of the Lord for them is already guaranteed and this is why they do not seem to care much about obeying the Ten Commandments that their Creator has sent down to them.

They instead amuse themselves by wondering whether or not Muslims love them.

Get a grip folks, it is far, far, FAR better that Christians spend their valuable time wondering instead on much more important matters, for example, whether or not the Lord is happy with them when they make a mockery of the Second Commandment.

http://www.(name removed by moderator)lainsite.org/assets/images/Pope-Mary-3.jpg
Ah, but some of us do care about the 10 commandments. I won’t go against them - and I know that is what mohammed did and that is why he had to redefine sin. And as for making a mockery of the 2nd commandment - to worship a pagan moon god, and the alter ego of mohammed which made it even worse than the pagan moon god of mohammed - is doing just that - going against the 2nd commandment.
 
Christianity teaches that ALL of God’s creations should love one another, you say?

Well then, do Christians care if Satan loves them?

And do Christians love Satan?.. I really do suspect that many of them actually do.
Why are you bringing up Satan when LOVE is in question? Your question reminds me of atheists’ claim that “if everything was created by God, God must have been created by someone else!”

Do you love Satan? Does Islam command you to love Satan? Your scripture says that both goodness and EVIL come from Allah! Why the need to blame and hate Satan then?
Not all of the Bible has been corrupted, some of it remains true.

And how do Muslims know which parts of the scriptures have escaped coruption?

Simple… the parts of the Bible which conform to Al-Furqan (the Criterion) i.e. the Qur’an.
First, no verse in the Koran confirms the traditional Islamic lie that the Bible was corrupted.

Second, many verses of the Koran confirmed the authenticity and reliability of the former revelations as a whole before the supposed revelation of the scripture was completed. Thus, Muslims of Mohammad’s time had no way to compare the former revelations with their scripture to determine which part was authentic and which part was fake.

Third, I have proven you a liar many times here by quoting the Koran verse which debunks your silly claim that only the Koran is the criterion (Furqan). Keep closing your eyes to the following verse which names even the Torah “al Furqan”:

Surah 21:48
And certainly We gave to Musa and Haroun the Furqan and a light and a reminder for those who would guard (against evil).

Finally, a verse in the Koran condemns people who believe in some parts of the Koran and reject the others:

Surah 15:91-93
Those who made the Quran into shreds. So, by your Lord, We would most certainly question them all, As to what they did.

If what you suppose is true (that the Koran confirms some parts of the Bible), the Koran fails to be fair and resorts to hypocrisy. 😉
 
Christianity teaches that ALL of God’s creations should love one another, you say?
Yep, says so in the bible:
John 13
34 I give you a new commandment: love one another; you must love one another just as I have loved you.
35 It is by your love for one another, that everyone will recognise you as my disciples.
Well then, do Christians care if Satan loves them?
And do Christians love Satan?.. I really do suspect that many of them actually do.
As stupid as your question is, i will answer it.
When Jesus said to love one another, he meant mankind. Not to love evil and hate. I suspect many muslims love satan, esp when they brainwash their children to think its ok to be martyrs and go blow up other people. And when they convince so called martyrs to bomb embassies, fly planes into towers and so on. You be offensive to Christens, i will be offensive back to you.
Muslims love others for the sake of Allah.
Quote, you said:
“I can tell you one thing about Muslims in general i.e. they care infinitely more about how much Allah loves them than any kind of love and affection that they may receive from Christians… or from Hindus, Jews, Sikhs, Buddhists or any other group for that matter.”

So do you love only other muslims, is that the case? Because here you state you do not care about the love of Christians or any other denomination. Your a living contradiction Hamba.
If Allah commands us to love someone, we will love that person… and if Allah commands us to NOT love someone, as in the case of Satan, then Muslims will not love that someone.
The Christian God wants us to love EVERYONE. He does not pick and choose who we should love. This is another statement of yours that proves your religion is false. A true and loving God will teach us to love everyone, not pick and choose who we should love.
It is NOT humanly possible for someone to willfully and constantly bow down to a statue without violating the Second Commandment.
I will quote to you, and i think this has been said to you more times than the economy has lost money, which is trillions, we do not worship statues, but, you, worship a rock. I put the picture on this very thread, did you miss it?
Not all of the Bible has been corrupted, some of it remains true.
And how do Muslims know which parts of the scriptures have escaped coruption?
Simple… the parts of the Bible which conform to Al-Furqan (the Criterion) i.e. the Qur’an.
Yes, so Muhammad says, I hate to break the news to you, but the quran is the one that is full of lies and hate. It teaches these things, where the bible does NOT!
So, i ask you, why on earth would an all loving God write a book of hate when his original and truthful one is full of love?
 
As stupid as your question is, i will answer it.
When Jesus said to love one another, he meant mankind. Not to love evil and hate. I suspect many muslims love satan, esp when they brainwash their children to think its ok to be martyrs and go blow up other people. And when they convince so called martyrs to bomb embassies, fly planes into towers and so on. You be offensive to Christens, i will be offensive back to you.
Please, dolpinlove, read what I have written above in response to Hamba2han’s false assertions, as what I have asked him with regard to Islam’s values he could easily ask you based on the sentence I have bolded. I want all of us to take a different tack in this thread, so to ask that of Muslims I will also ask that of you. I know it’s hard not to get angry with hamba2han’s very offensive writings, and I myself was very upset when I read them this morning. But please try to channel your anger into clear corrective posts. You are the Christian, not him. You represent the faith! And that faith is strong enough to withstand the distortions of Muslims. Let us all try to live up to the strength we know we have by answering all offenses with honest, firm, and loving replies.
 
Please, dolpinlove, read what I have written above in response to Hamba2han’s false assertions, as what I have asked him with regard to Islam’s values he could easily ask you based on the sentence I have bolded. I want all of us to take a different tack in this thread, so to ask that of Muslims I will also ask that of you. I know it’s hard not to get angry with hamba2han’s very offensive writings, and I myself was very upset when I read them this morning. But please try to channel your anger into clear corrective posts. You are the Christian, not him. You represent the faith! And that faith is strong enough to withstand the distortions of Muslims. Let us all try to live up to the strength we know we have by answering all offenses with honest, firm, and loving replies.
I do agree with you, and believe me, MOST of the time, im a peaceful person and do not engage in this type of tit for tat. My weakness is when you have to repeat things 50 million times to a certain person, esp when they get offensive.
 
I understand completely. I am also incredibly frustated by the constant repetition of Islamic talking points, as though we haven’t heard and answered them a million times, so they just need to repeat them ONCE more and we’ll all convert. 😃

I just want to make sure that everybody gets that I want this thread to be an expression of values. I know you know that and are just frustrated like everyone gets, but I thought maybe if I addressed a problematic point in your post in a spirit of Christian brotherhood, it might pre-empt a much less charitable response (and a continuation of a never-ending argument I’m sure you’re not interested in having) from Muslim posters who would use your frustation to play a game of “gotcha!” and completely discount the idea that Christians actually have consistent values at all.
 
OK, so even though your parents are members of group 1 and 4 on your list, their membership in group 1 supercedes their membership in one of the “lower” heirarchies? So non-Muslims have more rights than Muslims as long as the non-Muslims are immediate family members of yours? Sorry to keeps harping on this, but it is very foreign to me. I really am trying to understand the reasoning here.

I don’t understand why everyone can’t just have the same rights, regardless of their religion. This goes back to the question in my previous post. If you see all human beings as created in the image of God and recipients of the same God-given rights, then heirarchies like the one you are describing seem very strange.
First of all, everyone has the same rights. Let’s start with this statement. Certain, God-given rights, simply because they are a human being (although Muslims do NOT say that mankind was created in the “image of God.”) So every human being has certain rights. The rights to their life, to their property, to their dignity for example.

Now, a Muslim also has a few more rights on a Muslim. Let me be very specific here, so you understand exactly what rights I mean. There are five specific rights which a Muslim has on other Muslims which the rest of mankind does not have: (1) returning the greeting of salaam, (2) visiting the sick, (3) accepting invitations, (4) saying “yarhamukallah” on sneezing, and (5) attending their funeral.

More general “rights” include love and respect, that the Muslim conceal the mistakes of his brother, and other more general things.

Ultimately it doesn’t mean that Muslims are obliged to treat Muslims better than non-Muslims, although I’m afraid you have that impression. What it means is actually that all human beings have certain rights which the Muslim must honor and respect.

Now, one step further, a person’s neighbors also have specific rights on him, which non-neighbors do not have. This doesn’t depend on religion at all. And in fact, they are pretty much the same rights the Muslims have on each other, like returning greetings, visiting when sick, concealing faults, congratulating at times of joy, giving gifts, lending him money when he needs it, and so on. Remember, this is regardless of religion.

A person’s parents have, however, even more rights than this. Every human being has rights, but a person’s parents have more–they have the right that the child obeys them. And I am not talking about a child who is young, but their children even when fully grown are still supposed to obey their parents, respect them, be humble towards them, spending a portion of their wealth on them and treating them well. And between the mother and father, the mother has even more rights than the father.

So perhaps the best way to explain this (and please, forgive me for the shortcomings in my explanation) is to say first that every human being has rights on the Muslim, but because of a relationship they might have with a person, it’s possible that they have even MORE rights.

continued below
 
continued from above
Am I being uncharitable if I take your focus on legalism to be something of a distinguishing feature of Islam? I realize that not all Muslims are so inclined, but I can’t help but notice that other posters in this thread (of those who have actually answered the OP question) have not talked about “love” within the framework of a defined heirarchy of rights. You yourself asked if love belongs in such a framework, so I’m not sure how to read your post. If love is a right, then it makes sense to bring it up in relation to other rights within a framework like the one you have outlined. It still doesn’t really make sense to me (do the people outside of your immediate family receive less love than others? do muslims receive more love than non-muslims, even if they are outside of your family or even your country?), but at least there is a way to discuss it that you can define for me or anyone else you talk to. Of course, if love is not a right, then what does your heirarchy have to do with it?
I wouldn’t say it’s uncharitable to say I’m focused on legalism or that such focus distinguishes Islam–though the first statement might contain more truth than the second. The reason I might be focused on legalism stems from the way I have studied Islam and who my teachers are–that is, primarily, they are students of law. So naturally, my own perspective has been tremendously impacted by that, resulting in a greater focus (and understanding) on the legal aspects of Islam.

However, there are many other students and teachers who can talk to you from the other side, and share with you a more spiritual/emotional aspect of Islam. And really, they shouldn’t be discounted. Unfortunately, I can’t give you both perspectives because my own knowledge and view is limited.

That being said, I don’t necessarily view “love” as a right. I see it as an emotion from the heart that is not entirely under conscious control. I.e., I can’t make myself love someone. If you were to watch a man rape your daughter, could you imagine finding love in your heart for that person?

On the other hand, I do see more tangible, observable behaviors to be rights–to return greetings or visit the sick, attend a funeral, etc. Those are rights. I think that what you mentioned earlier was that these actions are demonstrative of love–regardless of the actual emotions behind it.

So the way I see things is that a person doesn’t necessarily need to “love” (the way I understand the word) everyone or anyone, but he must respect and honor them, and honor the rights between them.

Here’s a good example, albeit from the legal view. A wife has rights over her husband, and he has rights over her. Rights. She has the rights, among others, to be treated well and respected, fed and clothed. He has the right that she take care of his home, and raise his children. And these rights exist regardless of whether the husband and the wife love or hate each other. Respecting the rights, however, should lead to love. And love would lead one to respect the rights. Whereas neglecting the rights might hurt the love until it is gone.

So from my point of view, which has a more legal perspective, the key is really to respect the rights. And that that is more important and/or fundamental than “love,” which a person might claim yet fail to act on.

And that’s why I went through all I’ve gone through trying to explain it. Hope it makes sense.

Here is a link on rights in Islam.
 
First of all, everyone has the same rights. Let’s start with this statement. Certain, God-given rights, simply because they are a human being (although Muslims do NOT say that mankind was created in the “image of God.”) So every human being has certain rights. The rights to their life, to their property, to their dignity for example.
Okay. Just so we’re clear, I only brought up the idea of man being created in the image of God because this is what the Christian idea of equality ultimately rests upon.
Now, a Muslim also has a few more rights on a Muslim. Let me be very specific here, so you understand exactly what rights I mean. There are five specific rights which a Muslim has on other Muslims which the rest of mankind does not have: (1) returning the greeting of salaam, (2) visiting the sick, (3) accepting invitations, (4) saying “yarhamukallah” on sneezing, and (5) attending their funeral.
More general “rights” include love and respect, that the Muslim conceal the mistakes of his brother, and other more general things.
Wait…do the more general “rights” listed in the last sentence go along with the first five given to Muslims only? Also, does the fact that Muslims have these five rights that non-Muslims don’t have mean that a non-Muslim cannot return the greeting of salaam (I do this in Arabic class and no one ever told me I was not to!), or that a non-Muslim is not to visit his sick Muslim friend (or that a Muslim needn’t visit his sick non-Muslim friend)? I’m a bit confused as to what these rights being exclusive to Muslims might mean in everyday terms.
Ultimately it doesn’t mean that Muslims are obliged to treat Muslims better than non-Muslims, although I’m afraid you have that impression.
Well I’m afraid it does seem that way from what you wrote earlier and what you wrote above, so yes, I do have that impression. That’s why I asked for further clarification from you. Thank you for providing it.
What it means is actually that all human beings have certain rights which the Muslim must honor and respect.
Good.
a person’s neighbors also have specific rights on him, which non-neighbors do not have. This doesn’t depend on religion at all. And in fact, they are pretty much the same rights the Muslims have on each other, like returning greetings, visiting when sick, concealing faults, congratulating at times of joy, giving gifts, lending him money when he needs it, and so on. Remember, this is regardless of religion.
That seems to directly contradict what you said in the previous paragraph, when you wrote: “There are five specific rights which a Muslim has on other Muslims which the rest of mankind does not have”, and then listed those very same things. So I have to ask again, because I am apparently not getting it: what does a Muslim having “rights on other Muslims which the rest of mankind does not have” mean?
 
I wouldn’t say it’s uncharitable to say I’m focused on legalism or that such focus distinguishes Islam–though the first statement might contain more truth than the second. The reason I might be focused on legalism stems from the way I have studied Islam and who my teachers are–that is, primarily, they are students of law. So naturally, my own perspective has been tremendously impacted by that, resulting in a greater focus (and understanding) on the legal aspects of Islam.

However, there are many other students and teachers who can talk to you from the other side, and share with you a more spiritual/emotional aspect of Islam. And really, they shouldn’t be discounted. Unfortunately, I can’t give you both perspectives because my own knowledge and view is limited.
Oh, okay. I understand.
That being said, I don’t necessarily view “love” as a right. I see it as an emotion from the heart that is not entirely under conscious control. I.e., I can’t make myself love someone. If you were to watch a man rape your daughter, could you imagine finding love in your heart for that person?
I think your vantage point is close to my own, then.

Regarding the rapist: No, I probably could not bring myself to love this person. As a human being, the pull of my other emotions might be too strong. I pray to God that I should never have to find out. But, in that case, I should hope that after much prayer and soul-searching I could forgive them for what they had done, even as it hurt me and my loved ones immensely. I have had to do that before, though thankfully never in connection to rape. It is not easy, and honestly it doesn’t even feel like the “right” thing to do, at least not immediately. I did it anyway because ultimately I knew it was what was right. Vengefulness, however human it may be, is destructive to the soul.
On the other hand, I do see more tangible, observable behaviors to be rights–to return greetings or visit the sick, attend a funeral, etc. Those are rights. I think that what you mentioned earlier was that these actions are demonstrative of love–regardless of the actual emotions behind it.
Indeed. So I see them as demonstrative of love and you see them as demonstrative of respect and acknowledgment of a person’s rights. I don’t think either of us are “wrong” in this case (though in my personal view I would be misguided in my Christian faith if I were to adopt your understanding), just working from different motivations.
Here’s a good example, albeit from the legal view. A wife has rights over her husband, and he has rights over her. Rights. She has the rights, among others, to be treated well and respected, fed and clothed. He has the right that she take care of his home, and raise his children. And these rights exist regardless of whether the husband and the wife love or hate each other. Respecting the rights, however, should lead to love. And love would lead one to respect the rights. Whereas neglecting the rights might hurt the love until it is gone.
Ahh. I see. I view these as obligations taken up out of love. If I love my wife, I will want to everything I can to fulfill my obligations as her husband and the father of her children. If I didn’t love her, I might not take those obligations very seriously, and everyone will suffer as a result. The same may happen if she ceases to love me. So love is necessary for the respect and fulfillment of the above, whether you view them as rights or not.
So from my point of view, which has a more legal perspective, the key is really to respect the rights. And that that is more important and/or fundamental than “love,” which a person might claim yet fail to act on.
I see. From my point of view, you cannot separate the two in that way. To love someone is to respect their rights. If you’re not respecting their rights, you’re not loving them as you should. Of course, you can respect someone’s rights without necessarily loving them as I have set forth, but my point is that the opposite is not true.
And that’s why I went through all I’ve gone through trying to explain it. Hope it makes sense.
Well, I would like to sincerely thank you for your answers, Sister Amy. I understand how frustrating it can feel to answer the same questions over and over from people who just do not understand (I too deal with that here from some posters), but I nonetheless greatly appreciate your willingness to at least try to explain these things to me. I hope you will treat my questions as being asked in a spirit of good will, because I’m really trying to maintain that on my side, even though there are some points on which you and I will never agree. I respect you for having answered me so far anyway. 🙂

I will look at the link you’ve posted later. I must prepare for my Arabic class now.
 
You brought up a great question: How can Islam claim to be successors of Judaism and Christianity when they clearly teach both the OT and NT are corrupt? How can they adhere anything to what the 10 Commandments states when they violate it on a daily basis?

Even Atheists have questioned their inability to answer the simplest of questions. Rather than answer, they avoid what has been asked by answering questions with questions. Many religions outside Christianity also teach and promote intellectual thinking, not cowardice.
Well, that is why I asked for some more proof from any muslim - here is the same question I asked in a couple of other sites. None of them answer it because the only place it shows up is in the koran and/or hadiths - basically the claims come from an illiterate pagan. Talk about the gullible swallowing anything!

Anyway, here is the question:

**Question: how do muslims prove that the Bible was corrupted? Please show the proof of the corruption and the original Bible.

Please do NOT use the koran or hadiths to prove your point. There should be an original document, or text, that they draw this assertion on. your silence, or ignoring this question, tells me more than you realize.

Make sure to include the following:
-Exactly what passages, or chapters, were corrupted.
-Who corrupted the Bible and please don’t use a sweeping statement such as, ‘Christians and Jews corrupted the Bible’.
-provide the proof other than the koran and hadiths because they only have mohammed saying they are corrupted without giving any proof. And don’t say that ‘allah said, or mohammed said that the Bible is corrupted’ because that is just stuff from the koran and mohammed was an illiterate pagan who was throwing out accusations against a literate people who believe that the Bible is the Word of God and had no reason to rewrite it.

So, please provide some proof.**
 
Okay. Just so we’re clear, I only brought up the idea of man being created in the image of God because this is what the Christian idea of equality ultimately rests upon.

Wait…do the more general “rights” listed in the last sentence go along with the first five given to Muslims only? Also, does the fact that Muslims have these five rights that non-Muslims don’t have mean that a non-Muslim cannot return the greeting of salaam (I do this in Arabic class and no one ever told me I was not to!), or that a non-Muslim is not to visit his sick Muslim friend (or that a Muslim needn’t visit his sick non-Muslim friend)? I’m a bit confused as to what these rights being exclusive to Muslims might mean in everyday terms.

Well I’m afraid it does seem that way from what you wrote earlier and what you wrote above, so yes, I do have that impression. That’s why I asked for further clarification from you. Thank you for providing it.

Good.

That seems to directly contradict what you said in the previous paragraph, when you wrote: “There are five specific rights which a Muslim has on other Muslims which the rest of mankind does not have”, and then listed those very same things. So I have to ask again, because I am apparently not getting it: what does a Muslim having “rights on other Muslims which the rest of mankind does not have” mean?
There’s nothing wrong with returning greetings to non-Muslims. What I meant was that a Muslim has the right that a greeting be returned, and a non-Muslim doesn’t necessarily have that right. Not having the right doesn’t mean that someone can’t return it–those are two extremes. A person may, or may not. And it’s better if they do, since the Qur’an says if a person is greeted then to respond with a greeting equal or better–and it doesn’t specificy whether the original greeter is Muslim or not. 🙂

So by all means, greet away.
 
There’s nothing wrong with returning greetings to non-Muslims. What I meant was that a Muslim has the right that a greeting be returned, and a non-Muslim doesn’t necessarily have that right. Not having the right doesn’t mean that someone can’t return it–those are two extremes. A person may, or may not. And it’s better if they do, since the Qur’an says if a person is greeted then to respond with a greeting equal or better–and it doesn’t specificy whether the original greeter is Muslim or not. 🙂

So by all means, greet away.
This is pathetic. And I guess to an arrogant muslim - this is normal.
 
There’s nothing wrong with returning greetings to non-Muslims. What I meant was that a Muslim has the right that a greeting be returned, and a non-Muslim doesn’t necessarily have that right. Not having the right doesn’t mean that someone can’t return it–those are two extremes. A person may, or may not. And it’s better if they do, since the Qur’an says if a person is greeted then to respond with a greeting equal or better–and it doesn’t specificy whether the original greeter is Muslim or not. 🙂

So by all means, greet away.
And why doesn’t a non-muslim necessarily have that right? What edict gives only muslims that right?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top