I did some checking and found this:I don’t know. But single women are not presumably living in an intrinsically disordered situation. I think that the agencies would prefer placement with a family having a mother and a father.
Now, due to the Pope’s statement, whatever its meaning, we will be faced with secular agencies using the Pope to argue against the Church.
I understand the Church’s teaching about homosexual sex. But as I understand it the Church also teaches that sex involving the use of what the Church calls ‘artificial’ contraception is also ‘intrinsicly disordered’. If this is correct, should adoption also be denied to couples who use such contraception?But single women are not presumably living in an intrinsically disordered situation.
The article said this:No, a same sex couple would not be appropriate.
It doesn’t mention gender. It says ‘single parent’. That includes men or women.The Catholic adoption agency referred to by the prior poster has one paragraph allowing for consideration of single mothers. It says nothing about single fathers or single men.
I think the interview was in 2019 and H.H. Pope Francis was referring to the right of gay people to be accepted into their own families.… due to the Pope’s statement, whatever its meaning,…
So you think that two women would be a worse situation than one.Yes, it does say single parent. But the ideal adoptive family will have a mother and a father. The agency you cited did not rule out single parents, although that may be not be the norm.
But I reiterate, the Pope’s statement will likely lead to more State discrimination against Catholic adoption agencies.
So let’s cut out all this business about ‘it should be a man and a woman’. That argument doesn’t fly. It’s only based on sexual preference.Catholic adoption agencies, will not, I pray, ever cave in to homosexual adoption. They would thereby cease to be Catholic.
So the reporters must take responsibility and the readers also have responsibility:I hope you are right. But the comments have already caused consternation among many concerned Catholics.
2477 Respect for the reputation of persons forbids every attitude and word likely to cause them unjust injury.278 He becomes guilty:
- of rash judgment who, even tacitly, assumes as true, without sufficient foundation, the moral fault of a neighbor;
I asked if they ‘should’ not whether you do at your adoption agency.I don’t operate an adoption agency. You would have to ask the particular agency in question.