S
Stanislaw
Guest
Hi i have a question. Is Angel of the Lord Jesus himself according to Catholic Church?
No. There is no teaching of the Church that states this as doctrine.Is Angel of the Lord Jesus himself according to Catholic Church?
No. Angels are not God.I think Yes, if you translate Angel as Messenger.
It’s because the message of the angel is the message he was sent by God to convey. You’re overthinking this…Notice how Moses when writing switches from Angel of the LORD to the LORD.
I thought of that, too. There’s another group out there, though, who claim that angel appearances are really Jesus, right?I think that that’s a Mormon belief
The Messiah is called the Angel of Good Counsel.No. Angels are not God.
Or the Angel is none other than the Second Person of the Holy Trinity.It’s because the message of the angel is the message he was sent by God to convey. You’re overthinking this…
I think the Jehovah’s Witnesses do.I thought of that, too. There’s another group out there, though, who claim that angel appearances are really Jesus, right?
Augustine said that the Angel of the Lord in the Burning Bush is correctly understood as Jesus.Gorgias:
I think the Jehovah’s Witnesses do.I thought of that, too. There’s another group out there, though, who claim that angel appearances are really Jesus, right?
Isn’t there also a school of thought that this was the Trinity? Hence the icon by Andrei Rublev?An often cited theophany [appearance] of Christ occurs in the visit of the “three men” to Abraham and Sarah in Genesis 18:1-16:
Many say it is a representation or “type” of the Trinity, but later the two angels go to Sodom to blind the people and rescue LotIsn’t there also a school of thought that this was the Trinity? Hence the icon by Andrei Rublev?
Sigh.. Isaiah 9:6? μεγάλης βουλῆς ἄγγελος …? “Messenger of great council”?The Messiah is called the Angel of Good Counsel.
OK. So we’ve got an ECS who sees this.Augustine saw this.
we cannot say that the Son of God is the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, and that the Father is not; nor will any one dare to deny that either the Holy Spirit, or the Trinity itself, whom we believe and understand to be the one God, is the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.
Was he declaring a doctrine, or merely an interpretation?Augustine said that the Angel of the Lord in the Burning Bush is correctly understood as Jesus.
Was he an Arian?
It becomes fun when folks assert “you’re wrong and you have to hold to my belief in this matter”, on something that’s not being asserted by the Church as such.Why does this bother people? There’s two possible interpretations and Catholics are free to hold either.
Which is exactly what Angel means.Sigh. . Isaiah 9:6? μεγάλης βουλῆς ἄγγελος …? “Messenger of great council”?
He’s affirmming the Trinity. He’s not saying the Son isn’t the Angel of the Lord.we cannot say that the Son of God is the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, and that the Father is not; nor will any one dare to deny that either the Holy Spirit, or the Trinity itself, whom we believe and understand to be the one God, is the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.
Which is something, you did.It becomes fun when folks assert “you’re wrong and you have to hold to my belief in this matter”, on something that’s not being asserted by the Church as such.