Angels' hierarchy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andres88
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Andres88

Guest
I don’t know where to pose this question, but anyway:

Today is the Feast of the Guardian Angels. I came across the question: does the Catholic Church officially recognizes a specific hierarchy regarding the angels? As far as I’m aware of, Archangels are “higher” than normal Angels, but there are also Cherubs and Seraphs (and if I’m not mistaken, the latter were “higher” than the former).

Please illuminate me on this.
 
Traditional teaching, though not binding Magisterial teaching as far as I know, says there are nine levels or “choirs” of angels. The exact naming of these choirs varies by tradition. One version is, from highest to lowest: Seraphim, Cherubim, Thrones, Dominions, Virtues, Powers, Principalities, Archangels, and Angels.

Most of the names of individual choirs could probably be used to describe some or all of the others. For example, all of them obviously are angles, though only the lowest rank are given this as their choir’s name. “Archangel” could refer to any elite angel, regardless of whether they belong to the choir named “Archangels”. “Cherubim” is taken from the Old Testament and may or may not have originally referred to what we call angels at all, but tradition has assigned the name to the second highest choir. “Seraphim” is also of Hebrew Biblical origin and means something like “burning ones.” We say that they burn with love for God, but the word was also used by the Hebrews to refer to poisonous snakes (snakes whose bites “burn”), and through this we have the connection to Satan, who is often said to have been a Seraph prior to his rebellion against God. Other names, like Principalities and Powers, are taken from New Testament texts, often referring to demons which exegetes (or eisegetes, perhaps) have interpreted as angels who fell from these middle choirs.

Most of this does not have a great deal of bearing on an ordinary human being’s faith life. If the higher choirs have much influence on human affairs we know very little about it. Guardian angels on the other hand, who I’ve heard described as belonging to the lowest choir though I don’t know what the ultimate source is for that idea is, are clearly important due to their individual relationship with us. They protect and guide us throughout our lives, so it is good to remember and thank them from time to time.
 
I always thought there were nine types of angels in the hierarchy.

catholic.org/saints/angels/angelchoir.php

Its why I was disappointed the show the Game of Thrones wasn’t about the angelic hierarchy.
That list is a bit unusual in that it places Archangels above Principalities, but as I said there are a lot of minor variations in the listing of the nine choirs. In fact, as I recall there is even an alternate tradition that says there are only seven choirs. It is also rather silly in assigning numbers of wings and so forth to them. Angels don’t have physical bodies and therefore don’t have wings. They can be represented to a human being in a visible way like that, but that is not really their nature. Also some of the descriptions of heavenly cherubim may really be the Seraphim under a different but also accurate name (like how all of them are also accurately referred to as Archangels) without their actually belonging to that lower choir.

Oh, and I just noticed, the description of the Principalities only describes demonic ones. This, I am fairly confident, is a serious error. If the whole choir tradition is valid at all then surely there are good Principalities left too, just as the list itself recognizes that there are good Powers, Dominions, and Thrones.
 
Fr. Barron in episode 10 of the Catholicism video series speculates that God may have created a diversity of angels in the heavens similar to, or even much greater than, the diversity of species here on earth (which scientists believe to be millions).

One could take the analogy a bit further. If these angels have different and complementary natures, they might constitute something like an ecosystem here on earth, in which creatures are interdependent, not strictly hierarchical, and by which the total can be much greater (more powerful, more glorious) than the sum of its parts.
 
Oh, and I just noticed, the description of the Principalities only describes demonic ones. This, I am fairly confident, is a serious error. If the whole choir tradition is valid at all then surely there are good Principalities left too, just as the list itself recognizes that there are good Powers, Dominions, and Thrones.
Yeah, angels of all choirs (not all the angels of a choir) have fallen. If there were no good angels left in one of the choirs, then praying the chaplet of Saint Michael (in which you ask each of the nine choirs for intercession) would be a seriously dangerous prayer! I don’t think Pope Pius IX would have approved a chaplet that prayed to demons and asked for their intrcession!

Of course, very little of angelology is concrete information. Much of what we have today is has been derived out of a rather limited pool of information. I believe Thomas Aquinas was the biggest contributor to angelology, due to compiling most of the information and ideas about angels at the time and advancing the understanding of their nature with his own ideas.

There’s a book by Peter Kreeft called “Angels (and Demons): What do we really know about them?”, that is a really good source for anyone who is curious to learn more about angels. It’s a small book, but it has a lot of good information in it. It’s scholarly, yet easy to read, which is why I highly recommend it to people when the subject arises.
 
I second the Angels and Demons book by Peter Kreeft. Excellent catechesis on the angels.
 
Fr. Barron in episode 10 of the Catholicism video series speculates that God may have created a diversity of angels in the heavens similar to, or even much greater than, the diversity of species here on earth (which scientists believe to be millions).

One could take the analogy a bit further. If these angels have different and complementary natures, they might constitute something like an ecosystem here on earth, in which creatures are interdependent, not strictly hierarchical, and by which the total can be much greater (more powerful, more glorious) than the sum of its parts.
Yeah, Fr. Barron is pulling from Thomas Aquinas here. (Love his video series, btw. After watching it at my parish, I bought a copy for myself. Highly recommend it!)

Aquinas points out that angels are not physical, so the only way for them to be separate beings from each other is for them to have different spiritual makeups, or attributes. Because of this, each angel is effectively its own species of creature. Some angels are very simple, who’s attributes are mainly just to praise God. Some are more complex, like being able to deliver messages, interact with our world, etc. The more simple the angel, the more focused it is on God, which increases it’s closeness with God. The simplest of angels of angels form the highest choir. Angels that are more complex and have the most attributes focus on a lot more than just God, so they are not as close to God as angels that are mo simple to them are. The most complex angels form the lowest choir.

Guardian angels come from the choir of angels, which is the lowest choir, because these angels are the most complex due to their many attributes that allow them to function in the capacity that they do.

That’s a rough summary of Aquinas’s work on the subject, but hopefully it makes enough sense to get the idea across. It’s a pretty intriguing subject, really.
 
There is this whole new age angelology going on right now. Good angels have been feminized in this new age angelology which is contrary to the Biblical accounts of angels of God who are extraordinarily masculine, they have masculine names and confer the power of God because they are directly in His presence and are sent as His messengers. Look at the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah those angels were anything but pretty little women who float on clouds and play harps like they are a second cousin to a fairy.
 
I was wondering if there are any officially approved angel shrines. That is to say shrines which at which angels have appeared which are officially approved for pilgrimage etc.

A visit to the shrine of St Robert
Well, it may be a little known fact but as I recall at least one angel appeared to the children at Fatima in addition to the appearances of Mary. I assume that part of the visions was also approved, though I don’t know if any emphasis is placed on it at the shrine there.
 
I was wondering if there are any officially approved angel shrines. That is to say shrines which at which angels have appeared which are officially approved for pilgrimage etc.

A visit to the shrine of St Robert
There is a shrine dedicated to St. Michael the Archangel called the "Basilica of St. Michael on Mont St. Angelo (formly called Mont. Gargano). Padre Pio often suggest to people especially those with spiritual troubles to visit to the Basilica of St. Michael on Mont St. Angelo because it was not far from San Giovanni Rotondo. Often times, he would hand them a prayer to St. Michael - encouraging them to have a devotion to him. We should all take heed to Padre Pio’s advise and call upon St Michael for help because these times are called by some: The Great Apostasy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top