Anglican visiting for the first time

  • Thread starter Thread starter Potter
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes. It is the liturgical norm. Whether or not you happen to like it is irrelevant.

Your reasoning “Jesus did not turn anyone away” is likewise irrelevant to the topic. Neither does the Church turn anyone away. Everyone is welcome to receive Holy Communion, provided that the person is properly disposed.

The Church decides the actions and gestures at the Mass. The time for Communion is not the time for blessings. It really is that simple.
The day that the actions of Jesus become irrelevant and are superceded by liturgical norms (which incidentally are not normative throughout the rest of the worldwide church) is the day that religion becomes more about man made law than Christlike actions
 
The day that the actions of Jesus become irrelevant and are superceded by liturgical norms (which incidentally are not normative throughout the rest of the worldwide church) is the day that religion becomes more about man made law than Christlike actions
You are twisting what I said.

Your justification for disregarding the Church’s norms are likewise twisting the meaning of the Gospels that you quote.

The time for receiving Holy Communion is not the time for individual blessings. If you think that you know better than the Church on this, all I can say is that you could not be more wrong.
 
You are twisting what I said.

Your justification for disregarding the Church’s norms are likewise twisting the meaning of the Gospels that you quote.

The time for receiving Holy Communion is not the time for individual blessings. If you think that you know better than the Church on this, all I can say is that you could not be more wrong.
Well the Catholic Church in the UK has no problem with blessing people at all. The gospel tells us Jesus remonstrated with the disciples who turned children away from him. Is this a US issue. We are supposed to become closer to Jesus not to be sperated from him. The people are the church with God at it’s head. Rules are often changed, not enacted, ignored or different in different countries. There has to be a degree of common sense. I do not believe that any of the Church’s rules were ever put in place to distance God from anyone who seeks what ever form of communion or contact with him. If they do well then it’s time we revisited them. A little like we revisited many rubrics of the Mass for example. Nothing is immutable in a living church
 
The Catholic Church in Canada gives blessings at time of communion as well. I was under the impression that if you weren’t pure of heart (haven’t done confession), hadn’t done your first communion or weren’t a baptized Catholic, that you were still allowed to go up for a blessing. I’ll be asking my priest next time I talk to him- seriously curious now
 
Well the Catholic Church in the UK has no problem with blessing people at all. The gospel tells us Jesus remonstrated with the disciples who turned children away from him. Is this a US issue. We are supposed to become closer to Jesus not to be sperated from him. The people are the church with God at it’s head. Rules are often changed, not enacted, ignored or different in different countries. There has to be a degree of common sense. I do not believe that any of the Church’s rules were ever put in place to distance God from anyone who seeks what ever form of communion or contact with him. If they do well then it’s time we revisited them. A little like we revisited many rubrics of the Mass for example. Nothing is immutable in a living church
You’re twisting the situation.

There is a time and a place for everything. The time for the distribution of Holy Communion is not the time for individual blessings.

No one is turning anyone away from Christ. Your comparison is, quite frankly, ridiculous.

It’s not your decision to make. It’s the Church’s decision.
 
Likewise, you’re twisting the situation.

There is a time and a place for everything. The time for the distribution of Holy Communion is not the time for individual blessings.

No one is turning anyone away from Christ. Your comparison is, quite frankly, ridiculous.

I’ll say to you what I said to the earlier poster: it’s not your decision to make. It’s the Church’s decision.
However as you can see the Church in different parts of the world does different things so it is not written in tablets of stone as you suggest if some Bishops’ Conferences allow it or even encourage it. You may find some of my thoughts ‘frankly ridiculous’ however I believe I make some fair points about Jesus’ actions and ongoing changes and developments within the church. For example the role of the Parish Priest in Pre-Norman England was usually passed from father to son. Some things change (for better or worse) the fact that some of us resist change is just human nature. Blessing people is a good thing in my opinion. If it’s forbidden are all the wise bishops worldwide in error. Maybe we should suspend them all. Blessing people in church. What a scandal!!!
 
However as you can see the Church in different parts of the world does different things so it is not written in tablets of stone as you suggest if some Bishops’ Conferences allow it or even encourage it. You may find some of my thoughts ‘frankly ridiculous’ however I believe I make some fair points about Jesus’ actions and ongoing changes and developments within the church. For example the role of the Parish Priest in Pre-Norman England was usually passed from father to son. Some things change (for better or worse) the fact that some of us resist change is just human nature. Blessing people is a good thing in my opinion. If it’s forbidden are all the wise bishops worldwide in error. Maybe we should suspend them all. Blessing people in church. What a scandal!!!
Every time you post you’re merely twisting and manipulating things to suit yourself.

It’s not your decision to make. The Church decides how the Mass is celebrated.
 
Every time you post you’re merely twisting and manipulating things to suit yourself.

It’s not your decision to make. The Church decides how the Mass is celebrated.
The celebration of the Mass varies extremely widely and always has done. I would like to think that another word for ‘twisting and manipulating’ as you so oddly put it is debate. Even the Curia has a devil’s advocate. I understand that our Church is not a democracy but when you make comments such as ‘the Church decides’ we clearly have different visions of what the church is. I personally was very pleased that the Pope invited church members to make their views known in the recent questionaire.
 
The celebration of the Mass varies extremely widely and always has done. I would like to think that another word for ‘twisting and manipulating’ as you so oddly put it is debate. Even the Curia has a devil’s advocate. I understand that our Church is not a democracy but when you make comments such as ‘the Church decides’ we clearly have different visions of what the church is. I personally was very pleased that the Pope invited church members to make their views known in the recent questionaire.
Again, nothing but twisting and manipulating. You aren’t debating anything. You’re just throwing things out there that have nothing to do with making personal changes to the Mass.

The time for Communion is not the time for individual blessings. Nothing you’ve posted changes that.
 
The Catholic Church in Canada gives blessings at time of communion as well. I was under the impression that if you weren’t pure of heart (haven’t done confession), hadn’t done your first communion or weren’t a baptized Catholic, that you were still allowed to go up for a blessing. I’ll be asking my priest next time I talk to him- seriously curious now
Haven’t you realised that FrDavid96 in this thread is a priest. He has already said that going up for a blessing is NOT the liturgical norm.
The fact that it takes place in some locations does not make it right.

Remember it is a Communion line and not a Communion and Blessing line. At the end of the Mass EVERYONE gets a blessing so its not even logical to want to go up for a blessing during the Mass at the wrong time.
 
Haven’t you realised that FrDavid96 in this thread is a priest. He has already said that going up for a blessing is NOT the liturgical nom.
The fact that it takes place in some locations does not make it right.

Remember it is a Communion line and not a Communion and Blessing line. At the end of the Mass EVERYONE gets a blessing so its not even logical to want to go up for a blessing during the Mass at the wrong time.
We can debate with priests too you know. The Bishops in the UK have decided it’s to be encouraged and they are priests too. Liturgical norms vary all over the world.
 
We can debate with priests too you know. **The Bishops in the UK have decided it’s to be encouraged **and they are priests too. Liturgical norms vary all over the world.
You can debate with anyone about anything but you cannot say something is not the liturgical norm when it is even though you do not like it.

Show me the documents that support your claim that UK Bishops are encouraging this and also what do you mean by Bishops in the UK. When it comes to the Church Scotland, England and Wales do not come under one Bishops Conference.
England and Wales are under one Bishops Conference and Scotland a separate Bishops Conference.
 
Thank you all for the responses. 🙂 I think I’ll play it safe and remain in the pew during the celebration of the Eucharist.
The priests in our city (in Oregon) often make an announcement for people at Mass, if they are so inclined, to come forward for a blessing at Communion time. I think its common in the U.S., as in Great Britain and Canada. Depends on the diocese, probably. Kind of trend over the past eight years or so.

Thistle and Fr.Dave are commenting on this topic that it is incorrect form, and I wouldn’t disagree with them, but recall the old saying, “…when in Rome, do as the Romans…” (or some such). If the priest at the Thanksgiving Mass invites people forward, go for it. Some day, the bishops will get it all clarified.:highprayer:

I attended High Anglican services with an Anglican friend one time and enjoyed it.
 
You can debate with anyone about anything but you cannot say something is not the liturgical norm when it is even though you do not like it.

Show me the documents that support your claim that UK Bishops are encouraging this and also what do you mean by Bishops in the UK. When it comes to the Church Scotland, England and Wales do not come under one Bishops Conference.
England and Wales are under one Bishops Conference and Scotland a separate Bishops Conference.
liturgyoffice.org.uk/Resources/GIRM/Documents/CTM.pdf Paragraph 212 Yes England and Wales is seperate
 
The priests in our city (in Oregon) often make an announcement for people at Mass, if they are so inclined, to come forward for a blessing at Communion time. I think its common in the U.S., as in Great Britain and Canada. Depends on the diocese, probably. Kind of trend over the past eight years or so.

Thistle and Fr.Dave are commenting on this topic that it is incorrect form, and I wouldn’t disagree with them, but recall the old saying, “…when in Rome, do as the Romans…” (or some such). If the priest at the Thanksgiving Mass invites people forward, go for it. Some day, the bishops will get it all clarified.:highprayer:

I attended High Anglican services with an Anglican friend one time and enjoyed it.
I just think it’s incredibly sad that this member has to ‘play it safe’ and not step forward for a blessing.
 
I’m just curious - if offering a Eucharistic blessing is truly outside the liturgical norms, but is clearly widely practiced, why hasn’t it been stopped? I would think, given its prevalence, the church hierarchy must know what is going on.

I have attended Mass in a number of different dioceses in Canada, and in all of that I remember, I remember being told about the blessing either privately or in an announcement (usually during funerals) and invited to come forward and receive one if I was not receiving Communion.

There just seems to be a contradiction to say that it is not permissible when it has clearly been widely tolerated.
 
liturgyoffice.org.uk/Resources/GIRM/Documents/CTM.pdf Paragraph 212 Yes England and Wales is seperate
The document is a pastoral guide. It has no authority, except where it actually quotes the liturgical norms.

What you see there is a conflict between the norms of the church and something printed in a guide (we saw that often in the U.S. as well, but not so much lately).

In order to be a legitimate change to the Mass, said change must be first suggested by the bishop’s conference, then approved by the Holy See. That did not happen.

We had the same thing in the U.S. before the new translation of the Mass. Documents which carried no actual authority permitted substituting a hymn for the Lamb of God or Gloria, and discouraging statues in churches. Those documents had no authority, yet they were distributed and people thought that the documents approved changes to the Mass. They did not, but they gave the impression that they did.

It’s the same here. Unless a change to the Mass has the approval of the Holy See, then it’s not a legitimate change.
 
I’m just curious - if offering a Eucharistic blessing is truly outside the liturgical norms, but is clearly widely practiced, why hasn’t it been stopped? I would think, given its prevalence, the church hierarchy must know what is going on.

I have attended Mass in a number of different dioceses in Canada, and in all of that I remember, I remember being told about the blessing either privately or in an announcement (usually during funerals) and invited to come forward and receive one if I was not receiving Communion.

There just seems to be a contradiction to say that it is not permissible when it has clearly been widely tolerated.
It’s just like any other law. There is a difference between what the law says and what people actually do. The fact that it’s being done does not make it legitimate.

The Congregation for Divine Worship actually is looking into the issue, but these things take time.
 
The document is a pastoral guide. It has no authority, except where it actually quotes the liturgical norms.

What you see there is a conflict between the norms of the church and something printed in a guide (we saw that often in the U.S. as well, but not so much lately).

In order to be a legitimate change to the Mass, said change must be first suggested by the bishop’s conference, then approved by the Holy See. That did not happen.

We had the same thing in the U.S. before the new translation of the Mass. Documents which carried no actual authority permitted substituting a hymn for the Lamb of God or Gloria, and discouraging statues in churches. Those documents had no authority, yet they were distributed and people thought that the documents approved changes to the Mass. They did not, but they gave the impression that they did.

It’s the same here. Unless a change to the Mass has the approval of the Holy See, then it’s not a legitimate change.
If our Bishops choose this approach who are we to take a contrary position. I’m very content with a pastoral approach
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top