L
Louie1983
Guest
Contarini, the argument has been addressed many times but you reject it because it does not suit your own personal beliefs. I refuted every argument you had but you used your “assuming” argument just to get you out of trouble but one day you will have to face the music regardless. I have provided many scripture quotes and teachings of early church fathers who believed and supported the church’s teachings about men only ordination but once again you hide behind you fallable “christological” argument that women can become priests. The core problem here is that you don’t trust the church fathers, the pope and the traditions taught, and (like every anglican and protestant) you have a poblem wit authority whih is why you refuse to follow the pope. This argument will go back and forth and i can continue to refute your arguments successfully but you will continue to be blind to the truth, hence i will use the most powerful tool (outside the mass) that catholics have and i will pray to our lady through her rosary that you will come to the fullness of the truth.Of course. But I wish you would be less focused on the “rhetoric” and more on the substance of the argument. I apologize if I have used unnecessarily insulting rhetoric. I wasn’t trying to be insulting at all. But I really want to know what you guys think the connection is between ordination and salvation, and how you think that connection allows Gal. 3:21 to be irrelevant to the question of women’s ordination.
The core argument I’m making is that precisely because Gal. 3:21 is about salvation (translated into the terms of developed Catholic Christology, it says that there is one human nature which Christ assumed for our salvation, making all believers members of Christ’s body irrespective of these various distinctions), it has implications for the question: “who can be ordained?” And I would like to see that argument addressed.
Edwin