D
Dempsey1919
Guest
The move to establish the Anglican stance on doctrine is great. At least, we’ll all know where we stand, and it will allow for more accurate ecumenism between the Churches.
Were did you read this?.Have the details of what the statement will say been made public yet?
Did that and it was the best move I ever made!I have great respect for many Anglicans I have met through the years, but I often wonder what is preventing them from becoming Roman Catholic?
I am aware of the many different factions within the Anglican Communion, and I would never expect an Evangelical Anglican to become Catholic, but Anglo-catholics are so similar to us that reunion seems to be the only logical conclusion.
Afterall, Anglo-Catholics believe in many of our doctrines and identify themselves as “catholic” rather than Protestant. I also know that the Anglo-Catholics are not happy with the way things are going in the Anglican Communion.
What prevents you from becoming Roman Catholic?
I pray that you will become Catholic one day.
Let’s use this thread to discuss our differences and see if we can work towards an agreement. Hopefully, this thread will be the catalyst that causes many of our Anglican friends to become Catholic in communion with the Pope.
If you haven’t done so already, you might want to air some of those issues here or, better, speak with a Priest. Sometimes people (including many Catholics) think the Church teaches things that it really doesn’t. For example, when the Church “approves” a Marian apparition, it’s not saying it’s real or that you have to believe it; it’s only saying that whatever is supposed to have transpired did not contradict Church teachings. Additionally, some teachings are not what would be considered “core” dogma and many Catholics may disagree with them. For example, the Church teaches that animals don’t go to heaven; but, if you believe our dogs and cats DO go to heaven (and I hope they do), that sort of thing does not rise the level of a core teaching and is not an issue (and you have lots of company). Maybe that’s a bad example, but it’s the first one that came to mind. In any case, if you speak with a Priest, you may find that some of your issues aren’t issues after all.This Anglican hasn’t moved to Rome because she doesn’t feel she could honestly say that she accepts all that the Catholic church teaches to be true, which she would be required to say: She probably shares views common amongst Roman catholics but the necessary statement probably requires her to be more catholic than most catholics.
No where…someone else said the Anglicans were releasing a statement on homosexuality that all members of the communion with have to sign…or something to that effect.Were did you read this?.
Extremely unlikely. Anglicanism doesn’t work that way.No where…someone else said the Anglicans were releasing a statement on homosexuality that all members of the communion with have to sign…or something to that effect.
I hope that the following link works iian.ibeam.com/events/pmny001/template/eFrame.jsp?eventid=27387&tokenPassed=no&userid=2008-08-07-23.12.43.256654&sessionstart=2008-08-07-23.44.35.387630No where…someone else said the Anglicans were releasing a statement on homosexuality that all members of the communion with have to sign…or something to that effect.
AngloCatholic,This Sunday (the 10th of August) we plan on attending the service at the local RC church for the first time.
The Catholic doctrine on salvation is really very all-inclusive. Virtually all of Christ’s teachings come from “love your neighbor as yourself” and as long as you do your best to live that way, you’re ok. Buddhists, Muslims, Hindus, pagans, etc., who live their lives in that manner, are implicitly members of the Body of Christ and are therefore “saved.” Of course it’s easier to live that way if you’re Catholic and go to Mass and pay attention (at least for me), but the Church in no way teaches that non-Catholics or non-Christians are going to spend eternity gnashing their teeth in hell with the devil and his pals. That would make no sense at all and in itself would be incongruent with what Jesus taught.Thank you for your post Matt.
One example that I’ve been thinkinging about this week is the teaching found amongst the early Fathers and in Lumen Gentium that suggest that salvation can be obtained only through the Catholic church or through baptism of desire or blood (martyrdom).
I can see plenty of evidence of corporation into Christ in members of other Christian traditions, and I don’t think they would all consider themselves ignorant of catholic teaching (and therefore would be considered guilty of mortal sin). There is plenty of evidence of the holy Spirit at work outside the catholic church.
May be I’ve not understood correctly - its just this weeks thinking point.
Basically, there appears to be a significant element of emotionalism here. Wanting to ‘feel good’ as opposed to wanting to do right. Contrasting the invalidity of sacraments with a desire for being in an agreeably gregarious group may be placing the emphasis on the wrong element (or track to keep with the rail road analogy…Catholicism seems very impersonal by comparison. To convert to Catholicism, an Anglican who is disposed to agree with Catholic doctrine has to put abstract belief over concrete ties of affection and the experiential means of grace. (By this I mean that while your sacraments may be valid and ours invalid, in terms of what we can experience it is easier for me at least to feel spiritually nourished in most Anglican liturgies than in most Catholic liturgies I’ve been to.)
Matt 16:18 is actually Christ’s claim on how He would found His Chruch. At one time Henry VIII was very much on the side of the Pope - and was awarded the Defender of the Faith (DF) designation (which the Queen still uses). Henry’s complaint about about papal authority ( ‘papal claim’) seems firmly attached to him not getting the divorce he so dearly wanted. No great philosophical or theological issue here - Henry was smitten and would have his way no matter what.Many Anglicans don’t find any merit in the papal claims, and more broadly most of us have problems with what seems to be the unduly (by the standards not only of contemporary society but also of Scripture and Tradition) authoritarian structure of your Communion.
In the scheme of things, I guess this comes from our Founder. I guess Anyone Who would say the following would not be considered as a liberal by many folks today. For example:Many Anglicans also have problems with what seems to them to be the unnecessarily and harshly conservative stance of Catholicism on a number of moral and social questions.
While I am not sure how moral or philosophical ‘squishiness’ is an asset. At the very least, it is of no help when confronted with a moral dilemma and you must make a choice. Saying that some enlightened and well intentioned souls will ‘squish’ left, while others of a similar but different disposition will ‘squish’ right, does not give the clear call that the ‘sheep’ expect from the ‘Shepherd’. How can we hear His Voice and hedge our choice? In Matthew 25 we have several parables about people making wise and foolish choices: the 10 virgins who brough lamps, but only 5 also brough oil, the servants who invested or burried the talents their Master had given to them and of course the Last Judgment, when those who gave to the poor, and cared for God’s suffering children were rewarded; and those who didn’t weren’t. There is no mention of rewarding those who ‘squished’ away from making the hard decision but correct.And even those of us who are disposed to agree with the Catholic Church on many of the most significant of such questions (abortion, for instance) find the “squishiness” of Anglicanism hard to renounce.
Personally, I think this is the only viable alternative considering how you have so constructed this challenge. While, in my opinion, there is no future in ‘squishing’ - the real problem is that it is not static. We ‘squish’ at our peril on a very slipper slope - and those who dance to different song are never satisified with the previous set of compromises - only new and more punishing compromises will do now. With no one standing for a principle, everything simply falls down.And if the price of taking a clear stand on abortion is submitting to a bit of legalism with regard to less important matters, I suppose it’s a price that I ought to be willing to pay. But it’s not easy.
Hmm, I have had the same thought about Roman Catholics becoming Anglican. I can’t understand why anyone would not want to leave Roman Catholicism for Anglicanism. I left Roman Catholicism after being born into it and practicing it devloutly for over three decades and became Anglican. The choice was very clear to me.I have great respect for many Anglicans I have met through the years, but I often wonder what is preventing them from becoming Roman Catholic?
I am aware of the many different factions within the Anglican Communion, and I would never expect an Evangelical Anglican to become Catholic, but Anglo-catholics are so similar to us that reunion seems to be the only logical conclusion.
Afterall, Anglo-Catholics believe in many of our doctrines and identify themselves as “catholic” rather than Protestant. I also know that the Anglo-Catholics are not happy with the way things are going in the Anglican Communion.
What prevents you from becoming Roman Catholic?
I pray that you will become Catholic one day.
Let’s use this thread to discuss our differences and see if we can work towards an agreement. Hopefully, this thread will be the catalyst that causes many of our Anglican friends to become Catholic in communion with the Pope.
Would you mind sharing your conversion story? I’d be very interested in reading your reasons for converting and leaving your birth faith.Hmm, I have had the same thought about Roman Catholics becoming Anglican. I can’t understand why anyone would not want to leave Roman Catholicism for Anglicanism. I left Roman Catholicism after being born into it and practicing it devloutly for over three decades and became Anglican. The choice was very clear to me.
Sure. I was born and raised in the Catholic church. My parents were and still are devout Catholics. Most of my relatives are as well. I was once a devout Catholic myself. I attended mass regularly, usually at least twice per week and I went to confession at least once per month. I observed the holy days of obligation and fast and abstinence occurances when necessary. As the years rolled on, I did more to deeped my Catholic faith. I attended Eucharistic Adoration when I could and said the Rosary regularly. I did all of these things but eventually I had to face the fact that I felt spiritually dead inside. I didn’t know Jesus and didn’t feel the Spirit in me not even a hint. I went on this way for a couple more years. I spoke with my parish priest about these things and spoke with others as well to no avail. I was dead inside just going through the motions. I talked with a neighbor of mine one day who introduced my to his priest who was Anglican. They invited me to join them one Wednesday afternoon for a healing Eucharist service which I did. I had never attended an Anglican service before that. It was surprisingly very similar to the mass which I knew so well. But over the next several weeks I attended the Anglican services but something was vasty different; I could feel the Spirit in the dwelling and in the people and eventually in me and my family. I recognized the touch of the Spirit from many years prior and knew it right away! I and my family found the Spirit in the Anglican church. Years have since past and still I and my family are very involved in our church. Dry times come but they go as well. I have a wholesome prayer life and I attend with parishioners who share their relationships with Jesus with everyone. It is truly wonderful and I believe in my heart of hearts that God led me there as well as my family. I read the Scriptures alone and with others in the church. They have new relevance and meaning in my life now. I feel and know God in them. My wife received her Confirmation from our bishop and my son will also be confirmed by him as well. We are home in our Anglican parish. My parents weren’t happy for us in the beginning but have grown to be because they see how it has changed my wife and I and our son. They attend on occasion with us. They love our priest and his homilies. I believe that if it weren’t for my mom and her deep family (Italian) roots in the Catholic church, my dad would join my family at our Anglican parish.Would you mind sharing your conversion story? I’d be very interested in reading your reasons for converting and leaving your birth faith.