T
Trader
Guest
I missed this the first time. I am not picking on you, but this is a very important misconception. It makes absolutely no difference whether or not you know of a possible impediment at the time of the wedding. You cannot agree to or negotiate away valid consent. If one of the parties did not or could not consent to a marriage that would be permanent, faithful, and open to new life, and you prove it, the decree of nullity will be granted.If you were able to obtain an annulment, it would be based on both yours and his state at the time of the wedding. The fact that it was an ugly, or even violent marriage later is not grounds for an annulment. You likely could have gotten one since he was on drugs at the time- but not certainly since you knew it. Your youth would have aided your cause- but the later developments would not- unless they illuminated some fact.
The marriage tribunal does not judge the morality of the parties, only the facts. If both parties agree to an open marriage, or one party conceals an intent to be unfaithful, the two situations produce an equally invalid marriage.