Another arguement for the First Cuase

[MindOverMatter2]

I don’t recall you ever saying it. As I said, theists would say it. That is, you’re committed to it.

I have never been committed to any straw-man that you have invented.

 

[Perplexity]

I think ‘straw-man’ is a misnomer. It’s not like I’ve objected to an argument you’re not making. Of course your argument doesn’t state your belief that God’s potential to create was actualized; but, so what? When we discern the premises of an argument we have to take into account all sorts of information not mentioned in those premises.