@Charlie Zeaiter
I see this post you linked me to is part of another reasonably long thread, I haven’t read any other posts in that thread, just your one that you’ve linked to.
Let me get this straight, you’re taking prophecies from the bible, showing that the fulfillment of those prophecies in the bible, and taking that as proof FOR the events in the bible? It would be more compelling if the people who wrote the NT weren’t actually aware of any of the ‘prophecies’ of the OT when they wrote it wouldn’t it? It would even be nice if the writers were contemporary to when Jesus is supposed to have lived. But they did, and they weren’t.
One of the ‘prophecies’ you’ve mentioned, I do find quite amusing, the wise men following the star. “Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem, Saying, Where is he that is born king of the Jews? for we have seen his star in the east,…” (Matt. 2:1-2). Since the wise men were east of Jesus, how could an eastern star or a star east of them lead them west?
As for many other prophecies, they just aren’t specific enough to warrant as anything better than an educated guess. General wording, as you yourself pointed out, is not good enough to be considered a prophecy. They also shouldn’t be things that people can act out themselves in order to fulfil the prophecy, that’s just weak. Throw out enough prophecies and some of them are bound to be correct, just by random chance, I stopped trying to count the incorrect prophecies of the end of the world a long time ago, suffice to say there have been hundreds, probably thousands just in the last 2 thousand years alone. I find it very suspicious when prophecies are only deciphered AFTER the fact of the event they were supposed to foretell. Much like anything Nostradamus ever did.