M
Mickey
Guest
Me too. :crying:Im a wimp–even with Christ holding my hand![]()
Me too. :crying:Im a wimp–even with Christ holding my hand![]()
Yes and Im sure you already know that I do not believe that is the correct intrepretation of that verse.Well yes…When Jesus told Simon he is Peter and upon this rock he will build his Church. He gives Peter (Simon) the keys and the authority as to what ever he binds or loose here on earth will be so in Heaven…
:console: Its nice to know your not aloneMe too. :crying:
Ah yes. It always come back to interpretation.Yes and Im sure you already know that I do not believe that is the correct intrepretation of that verse.
Yeah you know that is probably where the difference is more then the authority issue.Ah yes. It always come back to interpretation.![]()
Then you see the problem of trying to use the bible as an ultimate authority. Words on paper cannot explain themselves, or teach. Only persons can teach and preach.Yes and Im sure you already know that I do not believe that is the correct intrepretation of that verse.![]()
![]()
![]()
I have a question about the very last statement. Why are we saved through Christ–through the CC? Why is it not just through Christ as the bible says? The true body of believers(The Church)are the ones that will be in heaven. So it doesnt make sense to me that we are saved through the church. What makes sense to me is that when we become saved through Christ we become part of the church and hence end up in heaven.Then you see the problem of trying to use the bible as an ultimate authority. Words on paper cannot explain themselves, or teach. Only persons can teach and preach.But the church is not what saves us.
You are right, it is not the Church (as an institution) which saves us. It is Christ who saves us. But the Church is the body of Christ here on earth, and the holy spirit is its soul.But the church is not what saves us.
Thank you Jim I understand where you are coming from.You are right, it is not the Church (as an institution) which saves us. It is Christ who saves us. But the Church is the body of Christ here on earth, and the holy spirit is its soul.
So, in baptism, we are incorporated into that one body of Christ here on earth. His life flows through us as members of his body. And the more closely we are united to Him in this way, the more easily we become sanctified through receiving His grace.
Now I realize that protestants do not view salvation in quite this way. In their view it is more becoming spiritually united with Christ.
But Catholicism is an incarnational Church. Christ used physical things to convey grace and power while he was with us–water, touch, spoken words, even mud (when healing the blind man.) To us, the sacraments are a continuation of that–using physical things to convey unseen grace, as a continuation of the work of Christ.
It’s just easier being in the boat.
Again, and sorry for being redundant, but I think it bears elaboration… for me, it ALL comes down to authority. Did Jesus, or did he not, establish an AUTHORITATIVE, VISIBLE, church on Earth?Yeah you know that is probably where the difference is more then the authority issue.![]()
Isn’t this the same Church that assembled the Biblical materials and canonized them? Doesn’t the authority of the Scriptures flow out of the authority given to the Church by Jesus?
I know this is off thread, but who put the Bible together? Read Iraneous. The Bible did not put itself together.
Not a problem, Christine. You said it better than I did in any case. You just put the quote at the end rather than the beginning.Having read my post, I realize I looks like I’m questioning your post about the authority of the CC. I meant to back you up![]()
Dr. Art Sippo writes “[No salvation outside the Church] was reiterated at Vatican II in Lumen Gentium Paragraph 14. Now formal membership is the ordinary means of salvation, but the Church has always accepted that there can be extenuating circumstances and that one may be related to the Catholic Church less formally [this will include many Christians of other denominations]. Technically, all validly **baptized **persons are members of the Catholic Church.”Hi All,
I was wondering what your thoughts or CC teachings are on this question.
You know how the CC teaches and you guys proclaim that we(non-catholics) can be saved even though we are not catholic, well my question is:
What exactly does the CC say we(as non-catholics)have to do/believe/feel etc in order to be saved with never stepping into a CC?
This thought popped into my head while I was driving and I thought --Everyone says how NCC can be saved outside the CC but no one has said how(to my knowledge anyway).
Thanks for any insight or answer to my question:thumbsup:
Does not invincible ignorance also address being unable to join even when rejecting what is claimed to be true by the CC?Great.
Invincible ignorance and incredulouse ignorance are not to be confused.Does not invincible ignorance also address being unable to join even when rejecting what is claimed to be true by the CC?
google.com/search?hl=en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=invincible+ignorance&spell=1
Inaccessibility is a valid exception, for example, coming to realize the Catholic church is the true church, but because one is trapped in an islamic or other culture where the Church isn’t present.Does not invincible ignorance also address being unable to join even when rejecting what is claimed to be true by the CC?
google.com/search?hl=en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=invincible+ignorance&spell=1