R
Returning_Home
Guest
Since Mormonism has redefined the nature of mankind, the role of Jesus has therefore also changed. I’m not 100% on board with the original sin, but the Bible clearly states that we’re all sinners and fall short of the grace of god.As I said, the Catechism states that the Son of God assumed “our” nature. What is our nature? Sinful (according to you). Therefore the Catechism is teaching (according to your logic) that Jesus had a sinful nature when He was on earth. Please be consistent. “As man is” says nothing about the Father once being sinful, nor does Jesus assuming “our” nature mean that He had original sin (within the Catholic worldview).
The Mormon concept of perfection is silliness as it leads to the notion that we can be gods like God.
No one believes everything they read (or they shouldn’t). The fact is that we use books in universities to learn. History majors read books and more books. Their education is not devalued because they couldn’t go to the geographical location that they are studying.
This is an odd point, Mormons talking about believing in something that the works they attribute to their god, when nothing unique to Mormonism exists outside of it. No Mormon can go to Zarahemla, Bountiful, or Lehi-Nephi because not only has the site of the BOM events changed continents, those places never existed in the first place. In fact, you probably can’t even tell me where the Hill Cumorah is, can you?