F
FightingFat
Guest
I found this article which I feel helps to understand the problem of homosexuality in context of the current position society dictates we should all hold (i.e. that we should accept it as “normal”):
albertmohler.com/2010/12/15/so-why-is-incest-wrong/
It struck me that this could be very useful in terms of Catechesis and wanted to share it here. The position most people take (in my experience is to consider that homosexuality is “not hurting anyone” and thus “none of my business”).
I thought it was interesting because the court answer highlighted the importance of family. This case sort of contradicts the current trend to extricate sexual behaviour from the procreative act. It’s all private action that takes place consensually and without the risk of consanguinity! The case caused the courts to consider what exactly constituted the “uck” factor…Could it be our natural moral compass a la GS16?
I also felt is was very interesting in context of CDF teaching, which I read recently before attempting to explain the Church’s teaching on the matter to a young man who asked me about it:
vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19861001_homosexual-persons_en.html
I would recommend a reading of the whole thing, I found it very useful, but particularly, in n.7 it states:
albertmohler.com/2010/12/15/so-why-is-incest-wrong/
It struck me that this could be very useful in terms of Catechesis and wanted to share it here. The position most people take (in my experience is to consider that homosexuality is “not hurting anyone” and thus “none of my business”).
I thought it was interesting because the court answer highlighted the importance of family. This case sort of contradicts the current trend to extricate sexual behaviour from the procreative act. It’s all private action that takes place consensually and without the risk of consanguinity! The case caused the courts to consider what exactly constituted the “uck” factor…Could it be our natural moral compass a la GS16?
vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_cons_19651207_gaudium-et-spes_en.htmlIn the depths of his conscience, man detects a law which he does not impose upon himself, but which holds him to obedience. Always summoning him to love good and avoid evil, the voice of conscience when necessary speaks to his heart: do this, shun that. For man has in his heart a law written by God; to obey it is the very dignity of man; according to it he will be judged.(9) Conscience is the most secret core and sanctuary of a man. There he is alone with God, Whose voice echoes in his depths.(10) In a wonderful manner conscience reveals that law which is fulfilled by love of God and neighbor.(11) In fidelity to conscience, Christians are joined with the rest of men in the search for truth, and for the genuine solution to the numerous problems which arise in the life of individuals from social relationships. Hence the more right conscience holds sway, the more persons and groups turn aside from blind choice and strive to be guided by the objective norms of morality. Conscience frequently errs from invincible ignorance without losing its dignity. The same cannot be said for a man who cares but little for truth and goodness, or for a conscience which by degrees grows practically sightless as a result of habitual sin.
I also felt is was very interesting in context of CDF teaching, which I read recently before attempting to explain the Church’s teaching on the matter to a young man who asked me about it:
vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19861001_homosexual-persons_en.html
I would recommend a reading of the whole thing, I found it very useful, but particularly, in n.7 it states:
What do you think?As in every moral disorder, homosexual activity prevents one’s own fulfilment and happiness by acting contrary to the creative wisdom of God. The Church, in rejecting erroneous opinions regarding homosexuality, does not limit but rather defends personal freedom and dignity realistically and authentically understood.