Quote:Originally Posted by
Keikiolu forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif *Firstly, let’s see what happens when your head is removed from your body. Very soon your decapitated body becomes something other than a decapitated body. If you choose to think of a head as NOT a part of the body, that’s fine, but it shows how your mind works quite well indeed.*like I said, you are being too literal. if we play by your literalist view, how then can an entire community be part of Jesus’ body? god then would be more than a trinity.
I do love the way you “restrict definitions of words” when it suits you, and “expand definitions of words” when it suits you, so as to justify your thnking.
Your active non-understanding of the “Body of Christ” is profound,… or a tactic to mock instead of understand.
Dogma: All the faithful are members of the body of Christ. How? It’s a mystery. Deal with that mystery as you wish.
Quote:Originally Posted by
Keikiolu forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif *Secondly, the Church does define the Head as part of the body, as well as those who have died in the faith, as well as the saints, which you most likely also don’t think of as the body of Christ.*That doesnt necessarily have anything to do with the symbolism of “Body of Christ”. Maybe if you can show me an official catholic document that specifically says “The Body of Christ is Jesus and the community of believers”.
(
various other possibilities)
**
1140 **It is the whole
community, the Body of Christ united with its Head, that celebrates. “Liturgical services are not private functions but are celebrations of the Church which is ‘the sacrament of unity,’ namely, the holy people united and organized under the authority of the bishops. Therefore, liturgical services pertain to the whole Body of the Church. They manifest it, and have effects upon it. But they touch individual members of the Church in different ways, depending on their orders, their role in the liturgical services, and their actual participation in them.” For this reason, “rites which are meant to be celebrated in common, with the faithful present and actively participating, should as far as possible be celebrated in that way rather than by an individual and quasi-privately.”
Quote:Originally Posted by
Keikiolu forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif *Is what I said clarified for you?

*yes, thanks.
Quote:Originally Posted by
Keikiolu forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif *And how am I being paranoid? Are you projecting again?

*when you said i dont have a point, you are being too defensive that you assume i’m trying to attack you when i was really just trying to understand what youve said.
What I heard from you didn’t come to a point. Therefore, I didn’t see your point. If you see my saying that as my thinking that you were attacking me, that’s fine, although untrue.
And you have become ridiculously too literal…as a result making heretical analysis on the ‘body of christ’.
You’ll have to show me specifically how I’m being heretical.
That should be interesting!
Being called “too literal” by someone suffering from such extreme scrupulosity is too funny. Thanks for sharing, though…!
Best to 'ya…!