D
DL82
Guest
Jehovah’s Witnesses are not allowed to receive blood transfusions, based on their interpretation of the Bible. Presumably they believe that blood transfusions are wrong for other people, as well as for themselves. (Or do they? I’d be interested if there are reasons why not)
At the same time, Jehovah’s Witnesses aren’t against science and medicine, and will consult doctors in the normal way. My question is:
a) Does the Jehovah’s Witness faith have any moral problem with one of its members training to be a doctor?
b) Would a Jehovah’s Witness doctor have to refuse, on grounds of conscience, to carry out blood transfusions?
c) If so, would that make it impossible, in practice, for a Jehovah’s Witness to train to be a doctor?
Catholic doctors must refuse to carry out abortions, and some Catholic doctors and pharmacists will refuse to prescribe contraceptives on grounds of conscience. Usually, when this happens, patients are entitled to seek a second opinion from elsewhere. Abortion and contraception are rarely urgent matters requiring instant action, so the patient’s health and rights are not compromised.
On the other hand, it would be difficult for a JW doctor working in an Emergency Room to refuse to give transfusions, as urgent decisions would need to be taken, which would not always allow time for one doctor to stop treating and another to be brought in to continue treatment. Medical students have to undertake placements in a range of specialisms, including in surgery where blood transfusions are essential. Would a JW student be exempt from these on grounds of conscience? Would they be competent as a doctor without this range of experiences?
If the Jehovah’s Witness church’s doctrines make it immoral or impractical for them to work in the medical professions, is it immoral for them to seek to benefit from the expertise of those professions?
At the same time, Jehovah’s Witnesses aren’t against science and medicine, and will consult doctors in the normal way. My question is:
a) Does the Jehovah’s Witness faith have any moral problem with one of its members training to be a doctor?
b) Would a Jehovah’s Witness doctor have to refuse, on grounds of conscience, to carry out blood transfusions?
c) If so, would that make it impossible, in practice, for a Jehovah’s Witness to train to be a doctor?
Catholic doctors must refuse to carry out abortions, and some Catholic doctors and pharmacists will refuse to prescribe contraceptives on grounds of conscience. Usually, when this happens, patients are entitled to seek a second opinion from elsewhere. Abortion and contraception are rarely urgent matters requiring instant action, so the patient’s health and rights are not compromised.
On the other hand, it would be difficult for a JW doctor working in an Emergency Room to refuse to give transfusions, as urgent decisions would need to be taken, which would not always allow time for one doctor to stop treating and another to be brought in to continue treatment. Medical students have to undertake placements in a range of specialisms, including in surgery where blood transfusions are essential. Would a JW student be exempt from these on grounds of conscience? Would they be competent as a doctor without this range of experiences?
If the Jehovah’s Witness church’s doctrines make it immoral or impractical for them to work in the medical professions, is it immoral for them to seek to benefit from the expertise of those professions?