M
MonteRCMS
Guest
It is possible that God is teasing you.
You know right along with the platypus and the braided rings of Saturn.
You know right along with the platypus and the braided rings of Saturn.
Your pre-Vatican II education is showing, I fear.The constant, ongoing repetition here to ignore anything literal and call it symbolic is addressed in Part 23, above. So forget about it. Don’t keep bringing it up. Nothing’s going to change – aside from the constant repetition here that literal is bad and symbolic is good.
You clearly haven’t read Humani Vitae or Fides et RatioYou might be allowed to believe in evolution (though it is silly), but you cannot believe in human evolution.
It is. Some people believe it. Others don’t. It is not compulsory.It is a matter of faith that Adam and Eve are the first humans, that all humans descend from them, that there was no death before Adam’s sin, that they lived in a physical paradise, and that Adam was directly formed from dust and Eve was directly formed from the rib of Adam.
If they were facts, they would, but I don’t think they are facts.Personally, I think all these facts preclude any kind of evolution.
No, of course it’s not. Whatever gave you that idea?The problem comes in when people believe in things like Neanderthals and proto-humans. That is absolutely forbidden.
As far as I am aware, the Church still requires us to believe Scripture is truthful.If they were facts, they would, but I don’t think they are facts.
The constant teaching and Tradition of the Church.No, of course it’s not. Whatever gave you that idea?
Again, you are ignoring the clear and consistent teaching of Eve coming from Adam. How do you reconcile it? Just do some hand waving?But my point is that Catholics can accept evolution and be faithful – to both church teaching and Scripture.
Which would be also known as methodological naturalism.“While the Church permits belief in either special creation or developmental creation on certain questions, it in no circumstances permits belief in atheistic evolution.”
What specific Vatican II document showed this?Your pre-Vatican II education is showing, I fear.
Clear and consistent? Pre-Vatican II, I dare say.Again, you are ignoring the clear and consistent teaching of Eve coming from Adam.