Here’s my response, which I plan on discussing with our pastor on Monday:
The top-level quotes were taken from the following document, which I found on Fr. Gregory Bramlage’s website (
missionariesofthenewevangelization.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Generational-Healing-Mass.pdf)
“Great traumas may be healed through generational healing prayer without your knowing their exact cause. However, if you find that your family’s problems are not completely resolved after one Holy Communion or healing prayer session, continue to intercede for them. In some cases, it may be necessary for prayer for the Healing of Generations to be repeated several times for family bloodlines.”
- This implies that there is no value in suffering (redemptive or otherwise) or taking up your cross daily. The intent of this healing prayer is to continue until all of your family’s problems are resolved. I know we are to pray without ceasing, but there is no promise that our prayers will relieve us of all of our ills.
CCC 1505: Moved by so much suffering Christ not only allows himself to be touched by the sick, but he makes their miseries his own: “He took our infirmities and bore our diseases.” But he did not heal all the sick. His healings were signs of the coming of the Kingdom of God. They announced a more radical healing: the victory over sin and death through his Passover. On the cross Christ took upon himself the whole weight of evil and took away the “sin of the world,” of which illness is only a consequence. By his passion and death on the cross Christ has given a new meaning to suffering: it can henceforth configure us to him and unite us with his redemptive Passion.
CCC 1521: Union with the passion of Christ. By the grace of this sacrament (anointing of the sick) the sick person receives the strength and the gift of uniting himself more closely to Christ’s Passion: in a certain way he is consecrated to bear fruit by configuration to the Savior’s redemptive Passion. Suffering, a consequence of original sin, acquires a new meaning; it becomes a participation in the saving work of Jesus.
If it becomes a “participation in the saving work of Jesus,” then it doesn’t make sense that the only good that can be done with suffering is to end it.
- Certainly, we can pray that suffering would be minimized or eliminated. But the fact that this document encourages us to keep coming back for family tree healing prayers until they’re completely gone indicates that they’re ONLY supposed to be completely gone, that there is nothing good we can do with them other than to eliminate them. This document doesn’t elucidate the value of redemptive suffering at all.
- According to the Catechism (1520 - 1523), the effects of the sacrament for the sick are as follows:
CCC 1520 says that it confers “a particular gift of the Holy Spirit” - for strength, peace and courage to overcome the challenges associated with the ailment. It also says that this gift is an assistance from the Lord in the power of the Spirit for spiritual healing (including forgiveness of sins), and if it is His will, physical healing
CCC 1521 speaks of “union with the passion of Christ.” It goes on to say “in a certain way he is consecrated to bear fruit by configuration to the Savior’s redemptive Passion.” That is to say, redemptive suffering
CCC 1522 - “an ecclesial grace.” It “contributes to the good of the People of God” and “to the good of all men for whom the Church suffers and offers herself through Christ to God the Father”
CCC 1523 speaks of “a preparation for the final journey.” That indicates that life has a finality that may not end in the relief of suffering.
- In summary, this document indicates (or at least allows for the interpretation) that suffering is meant only to end, has no positive purpose, and that continual prayer (following this form of prayer specifically) is a guarantee that it will end. This seems contradictory to these passages of the CCC.