anyone know about church of christ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter poindexter
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Here is what I want to know. Where does the so called “church of Christ” stand on two issues and their relatives…

Homosexuality and Masturbation

Abortion and Contraception

Where does the “church of Christ” stand on these issues?
I was raised in a very small “fellowship” in the church of Christ that considered itself the only one going to heaven of all the churches of Christ. They were definitely against abortion and homosexuality; as to the other two, views would certainly vary. But the CoC denies being a denomination and as such tries its best to NOT have any sort of organization above the local congregation. So really views vary by congregation. What happens of course is they have an informal structure above the congregation, the “fellowship.” A church whose views are unacceptable to the “fellowship” or “brotherhood” (nothing but a loose collection of congregations) will get excommunicated (or disfellowshiped as they call it). So certainly a congregatation can arise in which they teach that homosexuality is ok…but the much stricter fellowships will toss them out.
 
Solar,

I want you to be accurate. Catholic Christian, Orthodox Christian, Protestant Christian is entirely accurate. Anything other than that is perjorative. You want accuracy then be accurate. You are not a Christian. You are a Protestant Christian descendant from the Campbellites professing to be Christian by designation, now that is accurate.
Its NOT accurate. Just as the Eastern Orthodox and the Romans Catholics can’t really be lumped under one term, so also Protestants and Restoration movement guys can’t.

So we have more versions of Christianity than you list here. You’ve got Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant, and Restoration.

The distinction between Protestant and Restoration is the following (at least):

Protestant believes in justification by faith alone - Restoration does not.

Protestant beleives in original sin - Restoration does not.

So, as the Protestants are Protestors against Rome, the Restoration movement guys (like churches of Christ) are Protestors against the Prots. They are Prots that protest against Protestantism because Protestantism did not remove all the Catholic traditions but left a few (i.e. the Prots kept Augustinianism, the churches of Christ reject it for a more Pelagian view).
 
As individuals, they can say some hurtful things about Catholics, but there is truth in what you say about their approaching certain Catholic beliefs.

My personal opinion (and experience) having come from a Campbellite church is that if they did push their thinking a little further, they can return to the Catholic Church. For example, they insist on weekly communion, they define communion as the central act of church worship, and although they will say it is symbolic (no real presence), they exhibit a reverence for it that belies that belief. In actual rite, they use words straight out of scripture with no additional commentary (This is my Body…), which I think opens the door for a belief in the real presence on the part of an individual believer. They have a deep interest in the “Early Church”, and don’t mind reading or referring to ECFs in sermons - they just don’t credit them as being Catholic - but if you point out to them that today’s CC also accepts something Augustine wrote, they have to concede the point as being one of general Christian agreement. Although their organizational structure is congregational (each individual congregation is wholly financially independent, local Church), they believe in one universal Church, derived from the apostles (They don’t recite the creed, but would likely agree to nearly all of it).

They totally don’t get Mary, however, and are put off by iconography and religious art in general - kind of spartan in style.
Excellent review. Simpy excellent.
 
How about Romans 16:16- “All the churches of Christ send their greeting”
BM,

How about looking at the Greek and seeing that it is not as you have been indoctrinated.

interlinearbible.org/romans/16-16.htm

“churches all of Christ”

The gospel has been spread all over the world bearing fruit and the Church is one, those Churches belong to Christ. The Church is the body of Christ and those Churches belong to Him…since they are His bride…and if you look and see what Paul is saying…

“churches all of Christ”…close but no cigar because now that you invoke the letter to the Romans you have see that Paul is also saying that the Church is the mystery by which the gentiles are being made fellow heirs of Christ. You then have to invoke Ephesians, also written by Paul and see that the Church is the mystery hidden for all ages through which the manifold wisdom of God is known…so that you must understand that the Church, as the Bride…and Christ as the head…cannot change…that bride was hidden, now revealed and the head kept it together, unless you believe that Christ cannot manage His bride…

You then must consider that the manifold wisdom of God declares Moral teachings such as contraception and masturbation are sin…something that the so called “church of christ” does not…negating any suggestion that the manifold wisdom of God comes through what you have been taught to be the “church of Christ”…

One Lord, One Faith, One Head, One Body, One Bride…not many…and if you want to believe that the Church/bride/ went astray…then you need to renogotiate your understanding of the all powerful Christ…or is He since the Bride as you have been taught went astray until the Campellites were born…

Sorry…won’t work…😃
 
Coptic - I am going to attempt to address all of your comments/questions in this post except the comment about the name of the church that will be separate.

Something to remember is that since each church is autonomous and their are multiple different churches that use the name “church of Christ” you might find my beliefs different from what others might say or what you might have heard in the past or will hear in the future.
Solar,
Then the history of Jehovah Witness, Mormons and Oneness Pentocostals has nothing to do with getting into heaven…then the question for you
how do you believe you get into heaven?
I don’t really understand your question, but let me answer it as best I can.

What I think get you into Heaven. First and foremost you have to believe in God and that Jesus Christ is His one true Son and Jesus came to Earth to die for our sins and that He rose again and ascended into Heaven. I believe that you need be baptised (full immersion) based on that belief and a confession that you believe it and you ask for your sins to be forgiven.
Thats the first thing. But you aren’t done after that.
I believe that you have to follow the teachings of Jesus and the Apostles, which is over course recorded in the Bible. You have to repentant of your sins and ask God to forgive you of them. I know that it is by God’s grace we are allowed into Heaven and we show our thankfulness of that Grace and our Faith by our Works.
I hope that answers you question.
Solar,
I want you to be accurate. Catholic Christian, Orthodox Christian, Protestant Christian is entirely accurate. Anything other than that is perjorative. You want accuracy then be accurate. You are not a Christian. You are a Protestant Christian descendant from the Campbellites professing to be Christian by designation, now that is accurate.
Actually the most accurate description might be fundamental Christian or Restoration Christian. I wouldn’t describe CoC as Protestant since Protestant Churches were Protesting against certain beliefs by the Catholic Church back in the middle ages. Where as the Restoration Movement was started primarly by people that were attempting to Restore the Christian Church away from all man-made things that had entered in. And most, if not all, the leaders of the Movement were from “Protestant Churches” and not Catholic Churches.
But in general when I sit in Mass and I hear the priest talk about Catholic in other locations, he says “Catholics” the same goes for “Lutherns” or any other denomination. The only time I ever heard him mention a church of Christ, he used the term “member of the church of Christ in Lafayette” Which is very similar to what my particular church does.
Solar,
Beliefs are beliefs and not necessarily true. Mormons believe they restored the church. How do you see that one.
True, As far as the Mormans go, I refer to Galations 1:6-12 (NASB)
“6I am amazed that you are so quickly deserting Him who called you by the grace of Christ, for a different gospel; 7which is really not another; only there are some who are disturbing you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. 8But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed! 9As we have said before, so I say again now, if any man is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you received, he is to be accursed!
10For am I now seeking the favor of men, or of God? Or am I striving to please men? If I were still trying to please men, I would not be a bond-servant of Christ.
11
For I would have you know, brethren, that the gospel which was preached by me is not according to man. 12*For I neither received it from man, nor was I taught it, but I received it through a revelation of Jesus Christ.”
Solar, In order to be accurate you yourself said you must look outside the Bible and that would include Josephus and Eusebius. Your conclusion that the Catholic Church formed in 400 AD is based on learning from somewhere since you were not there. Explain the Oriental Orthodox, Eastern Orthodox and the Chaldean Christians of today formerly the Nestorians and now part of the OHCAC.🤷
I agree, looking at multiple sources does give you a big picture of the history, but again I refer to what is said in Galations 1:6-12. If what someone says doesn’t agree with Biblical teaching then it is accursed. As far as the other churches go, I don’t know where they came from, I would assume it has to do with Gnostic gospels or other misinterpretations or disagreements with the Catholic church. I haven’t really looked at their history much because Catholic history is far more interesting and relevant.
Here is what I want to know. Where does the so called “church of Christ” stand on two issues and their relatives…Homosexuality and Masturbation; Abortion and Contraception: Where does the “church of Christ” stand on these issues?
Homosexuality - generally understood to be temptation toward sinning like every other sin. God gives the ability to ignore and turn away from the temptation. The sin is being a homosexual, but giving into the sin of committing homosexuality.
Masturbation - Same thing, sexual sin. Masturbation is a result of lust and a sin just like adultery and homosexuality. Can be controlled and turned away from.
Abortion - Baby Killing, simple.
Contraception - Slightly more complicated because it isn’t really talked about much outside of families. Most people I know dont have a problem with physical barriers (condoms, etc) or drugs (the Pill). But would have a problem with the emergency contraception pill. I personally didn’t have a problem with the the pill until I took the NFP class and learned how it worked. Now if I was in a situation of using something other then NFP, we would not be using the Pill but I still believe physical barrier protection is acceptable.
 
BM, How about looking at the Greek and seeing that it is not as you have been indoctrinated.
interlinearbible.org/romans/16-16.htm
“churches all of Christ”
The gospel has been spread all over the world bearing fruit and the Church is one, those Churches belong to Christ. The Church is the body of Christ and those Churches belong to Him…since they are His bride…and if you look and see what Paul is saying…
“churches all of Christ”…close but no cigar because now that you invoke the letter to the Romans you have see that Paul is also saying that the Church is the mystery by which the gentiles are being made fellow heirs of Christ. You then have to invoke Ephesians, also written by Paul and see that the Church is the mystery hidden for all ages through which the manifold wisdom of God is known…so that you must understand that the Church, as the Bride…and Christ as the head…cannot change…that bride was hidden, now revealed and the head kept it together, unless you believe that Christ cannot manage His bride…
You then must consider that the manifold wisdom of God declares Moral teachings such as contraception and masturbation are sin…something that the so called “church of christ” does not…negating any suggestion that the manifold wisdom of God comes through what you have been taught to be the “church of Christ”…
One Lord, One Faith, One Head, One Body, One Bride…not many…and if you want to believe that the Church/bride/ went astray…then you need to renogotiate your understanding of the all powerful Christ…or is He since the Bride as you have been taught went astray until the Campellites were born…
Sorry…won’t work…😃
I haven’t seen that website, but assuming it is accurate, that looks to be a good resource. Let me address you comment about “church of Christ not being used.

BM accurately pointed to Romans 16:16
16 Greet one another with a holy kiss. All the churches of Christ greet you.

You post this as a literal word for word translation.
*16 greet one another with a kiss holy greet you the churches all - of Christ. *

Your argument is appears based on the fact that it says “churches all of Christ” instead of churches of Christ”
This may sound odd coming from a fundamentalist to a Catholic, but you are being to literal. You seem to have forgotten that grammar between english and greek is not the same. The grammar of greek appears to be closer to spanish then standard grammar setup of english.

Example.
“…kiss holy…”: in this phrase you have a verb (kiss) and an adverb (kiss)
In english adverbs and adjectives come before the verb or noun. So this phrase would be “holy kiss” in english, which it is (see above NASB). The same applies for the “churches all of Christ” phrase.
In this phrase “churches” is a noun with 2 adjectives, “all” and “of Christ”. In english this could be translated in 2 ways.
“all [of the] churches of Christ” or “all of Christ’s churches”
“all” is the primary adjective for the noun “churches” it indication the quantity of “churches”
“of Christ” is a possessive adjective for the noun “churches”. It indicates the owner of the churches.
So based on a grammar update of Greek to English the term “church of Christ” is a legit term that can be used for a church.

That being said though, there are multiple example of names of churches in the NT. Some are simply referred to as “the church in (location)” for example “the church in Ephesus” Rev 2:1
Some are church of God in Jesus Christ
Or church of God
or Church of Christ

And since you brought it up, where exactly do you find “catholic church” or Holy Mother Church” or “universal church” or Holy Roman Catholic church” or “parish” or cathedral” or “mass”
If you want to nitpick things like the name on the side of the building or terminology, I can do the same thing, but it is pointless. Thats why I stayed out of the whole shun vs. excommunicate vs disfellowship argument/discussion from earlier. It was an argument of semantics in which most terms mean the exact same thing.
 
I haven’t seen that website, but assuming it is accurate, that looks to be a good resource. Let me address you comment about “church of Christ not being used.

BM accurately pointed to Romans 16:16
16 Greet one another with a holy kiss. All the churches of Christ greet you.

You post this as a literal word for word translation.
*16 greet one another with a kiss holy greet you the churches all - of Christ. *

Your argument is appears based on the fact that it says “churches all of Christ” instead of churches of Christ”
This may sound odd coming from a fundamentalist to a Catholic, but you are being to literal. You seem to have forgotten that grammar between english and greek is not the same. The grammar of greek appears to be closer to spanish then standard grammar setup of english.

Example.
“…kiss holy…”: in this phrase you have a verb (kiss) and an adverb (kiss)
In english adverbs and adjectives come before the verb or noun. So this phrase would be “holy kiss” in english, which it is (see above NASB). The same applies for the “churches all of Christ” phrase.
In this phrase “churches” is a noun with 2 adjectives, “all” and “of Christ”. In english this could be translated in 2 ways.
“all [of the] churches of Christ” or “all of Christ’s churches”
“all” is the primary adjective for the noun “churches” it indication the quantity of “churches”
“of Christ” is a possessive adjective for the noun “churches”. It indicates the owner of the churches.
So based on a grammar update of Greek to English the term “church of Christ” is a legit term that can be used for a church.

That being said though, there are multiple example of names of churches in the NT. Some are simply referred to as “the church in (location)” for example “the church in Ephesus” Rev 2:1
Some are church of God in Jesus Christ
Or church of God
or Church of Christ

And since you brought it up, where exactly do you find “catholic church” or Holy Mother Church” or “universal church” or Holy Roman Catholic church” or “parish” or cathedral” or “mass”
If you want to nitpick things like the name on the side of the building or terminology, I can do the same thing, but it is pointless. Thats why I stayed out of the whole shun vs. excommunicate vs disfellowship argument/discussion from earlier. It was an argument of semantics in which most terms mean the exact same thing.
Solar,

Iglesia de Cristo, would be Spanish.

I never, nor does any Catholic claim to be Bible alone. Universal Church is Catholic Church. The gospel has been spread all over the world and is bearing fruit. That is the Universal truth.

Enjoy yourself today:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top