Apollo Mission: a Giant Leap Discrediting Greenhouse Gas Theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter Soutane
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Soutane

Guest
Apollo Mission: a Giant Leap Discrediting Greenhouse Gas Theory
By John O’Sullivan Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Researchers have uncovered proof that the Apollo Moon landings required a whole new set of hitherto unreported equations to get Neil Armstrong’s carbon boot prints safely onto the Sea of Tranquillity; the ones still relied on today by global warmists to ‘fix’ Earth’s ‘average’ temperature were thus known to be junk by NASA 40 years ago!

The paper, ‘A Greenhouse Effect on the Moon’ is a cogently-argued scientific refutation of the basic equations used by global warming theorists. Apparently, climate scientists may have falsely assumed Earth’s “average” temperature all along.

The study refutes the numeric bedrock of the greenhouse gas theory (GHG) by applying old NASA data. It seems NASA dumped the equations relied upon by supporters of the GHG theory, to get Neil Armstrong’s carbon boot prints safely planted on the Moon’s Sea of Tranquillity.

The paper is co-authored by Martin Hertzberg, PhD, Consultant in Science and Technology, Alan Siddons, a former radiochemist and Hans Schreuder, a retired analytical chemist. The climate researchers had the bright idea of delving back into NASA’s archives to test the so-called Stefan-Boltzmann equations in fine detail. The three men stumbled on the embarrassing flaws during an online debate on the science behind global warming.

Published online on May 24, 2010, the study argues that the fatal flaw has always lain in Stefan-Boltzmann’s equations. The long-trusted formula has been used by climatologists without question-until now. The researchers reveal that guessed at numbers used in equations are the “first assumption that climate science makes when predicting the Earth’s temperature.”
canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/23632
 
Apollo Mission: a Giant Leap Discrediting Greenhouse Gas Theory
By John O’Sullivan Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Researchers have uncovered proof that the Apollo Moon landings required a whole new set of hitherto unreported equations to get Neil Armstrong’s carbon boot prints safely onto the Sea of Tranquillity; the ones still relied on today by global warmists to ‘fix’ Earth’s ‘average’ temperature were thus known to be junk by NASA 40 years ago!

The paper, ‘A Greenhouse Effect on the Moon’ is a cogently-argued scientific refutation of the basic equations used by global warming theorists. Apparently, climate scientists may have falsely assumed Earth’s “average” temperature all along.

The study refutes the numeric bedrock of the greenhouse gas theory (GHG) by applying old NASA data. It seems NASA dumped the equations relied upon by supporters of the GHG theory, to get Neil Armstrong’s carbon boot prints safely planted on the Moon’s Sea of Tranquillity.

The paper is co-authored by Martin Hertzberg, PhD, Consultant in Science and Technology, Alan Siddons, a former radiochemist and Hans Schreuder, a retired analytical chemist. The climate researchers had the bright idea of delving back into NASA’s archives to test the so-called Stefan-Boltzmann equations in fine detail. The three men stumbled on the embarrassing flaws during an online debate on the science behind global warming.

Published online on May 24, 2010, the study argues that the fatal flaw has always lain in Stefan-Boltzmann’s equations. The long-trusted formula has been used by climatologists without question-until now. The researchers reveal that guessed at numbers used in equations are the “first assumption that climate science makes when predicting the Earth’s temperature.”
canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/23632
Interesting. It is also not surprising that the global warming alarmists have been using irrelevent and errant assumptions and equations to support their movement/religion. Yes it has become a religion where heretics who dispute the claims therein are shunned and intimidated. The Great Global Warming Swindle is a good video to watch (albeit at times presenting slightly exaggerated data and graphs) for anyone who wants to know what many alarmists don’t want the world to know.

Contrary to the fascist controlled media, the “theory” of man-made global warming is based on science mixed with half truths, pseudo science and unsupported assumptions.

More than 20,000 independant scientists have signed a petition with evidence arguing that there is no evidence that the global warming phenomenon is caused by carbon emmissions due to the burning of fossil fuels by humankind. The media ignores this and instead promotes as “fact” the movement against human caused global warming. An idea given credence to by less than 2000 “scientists” of the now infamous (Climategate) IPCC.
 
Exactly-a Religion that is part of the larger Religion of secularism.A religion that seeks to control thought,redistribute YOUR resources,and stifle any kind of dissent not through debate but through intimidation,loss of job security and ad hominum scorn.Oh and let’s not forget Manufactured Consent.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top