Approved condom use

  • Thread starter Thread starter angelerulastiel
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

angelerulastiel

Guest
When I was in high school our religion teacher told us once that the Catholic Bishops had said it was okay for married couple to use artificial birth control A) if a pregnancy poses a health risk to the woman, B) if not using condoms would damage the relationship, C) if the couple really couldn’t (were unable to) use NFP. Since then I’ve learn enough I’m pretty sure he was wrong, but does anyone know where these ideas may have come from? Was there anything that might have been misinterpreted like that? I am kinda confused how he got this information.
 
Rumors. That is all. Next time somebody gives you a statement like that. Ask them to back it up with something.
 
When I was in high school our religion teacher told us once that the Catholic Bishops had said it was okay for married couple to use artificial birth control A) if a pregnancy poses a health risk to the woman, B) if not using condoms would damage the relationship, C) if the couple really couldn’t (were unable to) use NFP. Since then I’ve learn enough I’m pretty sure he was wrong, but does anyone know where these ideas may have come from? Was there anything that might have been misinterpreted like that? I am kinda confused how he got this information.
That is totally wrong.
Use of condoms is forbidden. They cannot be used to prevent pregnancy and they cannot be used to prevent disease.
 
When I was in high school our religion teacher told us once that the Catholic Bishops had said it was okay for married couple to use artificial birth control A) if a pregnancy poses a health risk to the woman, B) if not using condoms would damage the relationship, C) if the couple really couldn’t (were unable to) use NFP. Since then I’ve learn enough I’m pretty sure he was wrong, but does anyone know where these ideas may have come from? Was there anything that might have been misinterpreted like that? I am kinda confused how he got this information.
I did hear that the use of contraception was highly debated and a LOT of bishops wanted the use of condoms to be approved by the church in the 60’s.
 
I believe that the Bishops presented recommendations to the then Pope recommending approval of barrier methods of contraception but that this was one step too far and the Pope rejected the recommendations, as was his right as Vicar of Christ.

I don’t think it was ever expressed infallibly though (such things are specific to the Deposit of Faith, such as the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary, rather than temporal laws) so it could change in the future - which is not to say that it will change, of course!
 
When I was in high school our religion teacher told us once that the Catholic Bishops had said it was okay for married couple to use artificial birth control A) if a pregnancy poses a health risk to the woman, B) if not using condoms would damage the relationship, C) if the couple really couldn’t (were unable to) use NFP. Since then I’ve learn enough I’m pretty sure he was wrong, but does anyone know where these ideas may have come from? Was there anything that might have been misinterpreted like that? I am kinda confused how he got this information.
It could be that some Catholic Bishops have said as much, but certainly not as a group and more certainly such would be contrary to Catholic Moral Theology.
 
When I was in high school our religion teacher told us once that the Catholic Bishops had said it was okay for married couple to use artificial birth control A) if a pregnancy poses a health risk to the woman, B) if not using condoms would damage the relationship, C) if the couple really couldn’t (were unable to) use NFP. Since then I’ve learn enough I’m pretty sure he was wrong, but does anyone know where these ideas may have come from? Was there anything that might have been misinterpreted like that? I am kinda confused how he got this information.
Nope. Not the Teaching of the Church…and not the truth…the person must have been very misinformed …
 
Note that this view was firmly rejected by Humanae Vitae.

It is interesting to note that today, July 25 is the 42nd anniversary of that encyclical. Note Psalm 95:7-10
Code:
For he is our God, and we are the people of his pasture, and the sheep of his hand.  O that today you would hearken to his voice!  8	Harden not your hearts,  as at Meribah, as on the day at Massah in the wilderness,  9	when your fathers tested me, and put me to the proof,  though they had seen my work.  10	For forty years I loathed that generation and said,  "They are a people who err in heart,  and they do not regard my ways."  11	Therefore I swore in my anger that  they should not enter my rest.
The last forty years have been a downhill slide, and things aren’t looking any better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top