B
Byz_Guy
Guest
I was reading a lecture given by Archbishop Vsevolod (Ukrainian Orthodox) in 1997 called “What About the Roman Primacy?” and came across this point which I thought was well made as something that needed to be addressed in the ecumenical dialogue:
scribd.com/doc/95109386/Roman-Primacy-Vsevolod
- The resolution of the discrepancy between the assurances
given to the Orthodox in ecumenical dialogue, and the practical
situation of the Eastern Catholics within the Roman Communion.
I have discussed this several times and at length; there is no
need to belabor the point here. Actions speak louder than words. There
are numerous contradictions between the beautiful, high-sounding assurances
given to the Orthodox in our ecumenical contacts with the
Catholic Church, and the practical reality experienced by the Eastern
Catholics. There is a powerful myth to the effect that Eastern Orthodox
and Eastern Catholics never speak to each other. That is nonsense. To
take a cogent example, the Eastern Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch
and the Greek-Catholic Patriarchate of Antioch both have their central
offices in Damascus and it is no more than a five-minute walk from
one to the other. The two Patriarchs meet quite often, and so do the
hierarchs, clergy, monastics and faithful. Comparing notes as to the
discrepancies in what Rome says and does with regard to these communities
is a frequent pastime, and these discrepancies encourage an
unfortunate cynicism.
At any rate, I thought the article good and worth the time reading:In Rome itself, the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian
Unity, and the Congregation for the Eastern [Catholic] Churches are
located on the same block, literally around the corner from each other.
Some officials of the Roman Curia serve on both dicasteries. Why, then,
do we find these inconsistencies?
scribd.com/doc/95109386/Roman-Primacy-Vsevolod
