L
LordHaveMercy
Guest
Don’t worry, I only speak for myselfOh give me a break, stop acting like you speak for god.
Don’t worry, I only speak for myselfOh give me a break, stop acting like you speak for god.
I’m not speaking out for God, just myselfYou do not speak for God on this issue. You have no idea of his intentions when he created these trangender individuals. I would advise agaisnt speaking out for God in this way.
Wow. This is an awesome reply! I’ve never thought of it this way. Thanks for this!As a Catholic, I don’t believe that the “Archbishop” of Canterbury is an actual archbishop since Anglican orders are not in the proper line of apostolic succession, making them null and void.
But out of respect for The Most Reverend Justin Welby and for the Anglican Communion more generally, I will always refer to him by his recognised ecclesial title. The same applies to “female bishops and priests” in Episcopalian churches.
I approach transgendered people in a similar way. No, I do not in principle believe that a person can biologically change gender. XX and XY chromosomes don’t lie. (Still - biological chromosomal or hormonal disorders/hermpaphoroditism does exist, about 1 in 20,000 men has no Y chromosome, instead having 2 Xs.The equivalent situation - females who have XY instead of XX chromosomes - can occur for a variety of reasons and overall is similar in frequency).
But out of respect for the individual and so as not to cause uneccessary hurt, public disgrace, embarrassment or disrespect, I will refer to them by the gendered term they see fit.
If asked about my actual opinion of transgenderism, I would unreservedly explain Catholic doctrine regarding sexual identity.
You assume that god is offended that these people consider themselves transgender. Do you have any canon law to back this up, any scripture or church teachings, any statements by the pope or clergy? Like a above poster said Pope Francis called a transgender man, a son of god.I just think God is so wise, and I’m so thankful for what he has created. I just couldn’t bring myself to offend Him by knowing that He created someone as one sex but choosing to call them a different sex. I know that God made a perfect decision when He lovingly stitched this man or woman together in their mother’s womb. but I would have to choose between offending them or offending God.
People are certainly allowed to change their names. Caitlyn Jenner can be Caitlyn if she wants, and it would be rude to call her Bruce.E.g. There is NO Caitlyn Jenner. He is Bruce Jenner with serious psychiatric issues.
I didn’t say God is offended that these people call themselves transgender. I said I believe I would offend God if I were to choose what sex to call someone instead of the sex God gave them.You assume that god is offended that these people consider themselves transgender. Do you have any canon law to back this up, any scripture or church teachings, any statements by the pope or clergy? Like a above poster said Pope Francis called a transgender man, a son of god.
Were talking about Gender not Sex. a transgender men is still female(Sex), but they identify as a women(gender)I didn’t say God is offended that these people call themselves transgender. I said I believe I would offend God if I were to choose what sex to call someone instead of the sex God gave them.
I’m not sure how it’s relevant, but Pope Francis has spoken out against gender theory, here is an example.
The pope is talking about teaching children they can change their gender. I am strongly agaisnt that but that is a different issue my friend.I didn’t say God is offended that these people call themselves transgender. I said I believe I would offend God if I were to choose what sex to call someone instead of the sex God gave them.
I’m not sure how it’s relevant, but Pope Francis has spoken out against gender theory, here is an example.
Right, I was very careful to use the word ‘sex’ because the sex that we belong to is primarily indicated by the bodies we are born with. When I use pronouns, I use the pronouns that correspond to a person’s sex. If I know that a person struggles to identify with his or her sex, I will generally avoid using pronouns if at all possible to not draw attention to the situation.Were talking about Gender not Sex. a transgender men is still female(Sex), but they identify as a women(gender)
Sex vs Gender, Your arguement just fell flat on itself.
Understood. I respect your position, I think I will have to agree to disagree though.Right, I was very careful to use the word ‘sex’ because the sex that we belong to is primarily indicated by the bodies we are born with. When I use pronouns, I use the pronouns that correspond to a person’s sex. If I know that a person struggles to identify with his or her sex, I will generally avoid using pronouns if at all possible to not draw attention to the situation.
Unless I personally know them, I’m going to call everyone “Sparky.” Should end the problem.People are certainly allowed to change their names. Caitlyn Jenner can be Caitlyn if she wants, and it would be rude to call her Bruce.
It is not about “my truth” and “your truth” but about truth.That works only if people believe “your truth” to be the only truth, and I can practically guarantee that someone who identifies as transgender does not.
And does a better job of alienating people than actually helping them come to the truth.
I don’t see any charity at all in your approach.
But what if you refer to someone with their previous name and they correct you with their preferred name. What do you do? Insist on calling them by their old name and tell them that they are deluded?It is not about “my truth” and “your truth” but about truth.
There is the call of the relativism that is so present in our culture. I understand they have likely embraced that call…but that does not mean I will sing along with them that song.
Truth is what IS.
And Truth in the mind is when what is in ones mind conforms to what extra mental reality - conforms to what really is. Conforms to the reality that exists outside ones mind.
And the person is not the gender they have suggested they are. They cannot change the reality of their being male or female.
We are to live according to the truth…and yes with charity (we do not throw oranges…but love them and kindly not go along with their misconceptions…and certainly not go along with the war on the reality of male and female that has begun in our culture).
There should be mutual respect.We do not tell people with severe eating disorders or sever depression to snap out of it, or disrespesct them by telling them their feelings are crazy. If you believe thats its a mental health issue you should still show courtesy and compassion to transgender indviduals and adress them as their preffered gender. We can talk about these issues more generally and how to fix them, but with the high rates of suicide in the transgender community (The same as jews during the holocaust) we need to be careful and sensitive on how we talk to them or else it cost a life.
John 3:16
Who said I would do either?But what if you refer to someone with their previous name and they correct you with their preferred name. What do you do? Insist on calling them by their old name and tell them that they are deluded?
It’s true but what does that accomplish?
Just talk with them lovingly.I doubt refusing to call someone by their preferred pro noun would encourage them to change their mind and would probably just put up barriers.
.
Your not lying to them by showing compassion. When someone has depression, you do not tell them its all in their head and to man up.Just talk with them lovingly.
No need for putting up barriers.
But certainly I am not to lie to them - that creates a barrier and goes against loving them.
see above posts.
That is your right and prerogative. I highly doubt you know any transgender individuals. If you cause a suicide through your determined agenda of telling the “truth” well I will let God judge you.There should be mutual respect.
“The Emperor’s New Clothes” (Danish: Kejserens nye Klæder) is a short tale written by Danish author Hans Christian Andersen about two weavers who promise an emperor a new suit of clothes that they say is invisible to those who are unfit for their positions, stupid, or incompetent. When the Emperor parades before his subjects in his new clothes, no one dares to say that they don’t see any suit of clothes on him for fear that they will be seen as “unfit for their positions, stupid, or incompetent”. Finally, a child cries out, “But he isn’t wearing anything at all!” - wikipedia
They should not insist I participate in and support their delusion by colluding with them in the denial of their sex.
It is demeaning, insulting and degrading to be forced to deny the truth. I will not be intimidated into doing so.
As others have said, I will call them by whatever name they choose with a smile. But I will use the pronouns (and actually try and avoid the issue by avoiding having to use pronouns) appropriate for their sex. Which was not assigned, it is an integral part of them and simply what they were born as.
“The Emperor’s New Clothes”?
We are living it, folks trying demean, belittle and even force others out of jobs for simply telling the truth, not going along with lies.