S
sidetrack
Guest
I was wondering that if a person’s blind could they be allowed to take their guide dog inside with them?.Thank you for your time.
Yes.I was wondering that if a person’s blind could they be allowed to take their guide dog inside with them?.Thank you for your time.
You’re wrong on that here in the United States, as freedom of religion is part of our law, and if a religious organization has a religious problem with dogs, they could ban them from the building if they like.I think any church that did not, Catholic or otherwise, would find themselves with a discrimination suit on their hands if they didn’t allow assistance dogs. According to the law in the UK, a person registered blind can take their dog pretty much ANYWHERE (including a place of worship).
See Post #9.You’re wrong on that here in the United States
Yes there allowed. However its customarily expected that the person bringing their Guide Dog inform the Parish Office/Rectory so that they can inform Ushers and the Church Custodian so there’s no conflict or embarrassments. I’ve seen this happen before and the Ushers refused the person entrance because nobody in the Parish Church administration was informed.I was wondering that if a person’s blind could they be allowed to take their guide dog inside with them?.Thank you for your time.
Yikes!I’ve seen this happen before and the Ushers refused the person entrance because nobody in the Parish Church administration was informed.
That’s awful and surprising, Surely it’s obvious when a dog is a service dog of some kind, because they wear a coloured harness or even a jacket? Why does the office need to be informed?Yes there allowed. However its customarily expected that the person bringing their Guide Dog inform the Parish Office/Rectory so that they can inform Ushers and the Church Custodian so there’s no conflict or embarrassments. I’ve seen this happen before and the Ushers refused the person entrance because nobody in the Parish Church administration was informed.
I know of one priest who needed to know so he could take his benedryl - he is that allergic to dogs. He always had to take it prior to priest meetings, too, as several other priests were dog owners, and that put him in close proximity to them long enough to trigger his allergy. He had a note in the bulletin that dog owners needed to let him know prior to scheduling a meeting with him, too.That’s awful and surprising, Surely it’s obvious when a dog is a service dog of some kind, because they wear a coloured harness or even a jacket? Why does the office need to be informed?
What you so easily claim as obvious is not always the situation at hand.That’s awful and surprising, Surely it’s obvious when a dog is a service dog of some kind, because they wear a coloured harness or even a jacket? Why does the office need to be informed?