Are LDS Protestants or are they separate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mannyfit75
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
ljahns,

If you are really such a humble seeker trying to find out about Mormonism, why not try asking questions that don’t sound like snide put-downs? Go back and read your earlier post. Do you really think it sounded like you were just asking about something that didn’t quite make sense to you?
None of mormonism makes sense to me. You misinterpret incredulousness with snide-putdown. I don’t mean to be snide at all I simply cannot believe what i’m seeing and reading about mormonism and it’s incredible to me that anyone can. :confused:
 
None of mormonism makes sense to me. You misinterpret incredulousness with snide-putdown. I don’t mean to be snide at all I simply cannot believe what i’m seeing and reading about mormonism and it’s incredible to me that anyone can. :confused:
These people will tell you this stuff with a straight face! I watch for snickers, but you never see any. They really believe it. You can almost hear the gears clicking.:eek:
 
For starters he went to many before the vision. I am unsure how much if any he did afterworlds. He was a young boy in many respects he was still learning. I had a psychology book a few years back. A large part of one chapter was based on some out dated now very accepted to be wrong ideas ( the whole drilling a persons skull to let the evil spirits out bit). Even though there was some bad info in the book it did not mean there was not value in the book at all. It had a lot of good stuff. I imagine that JS still read the Bible and went to churches to keep learning and growing even knowing as he did that they where not 100% correct.
I’m sorry but according to his vision they were not just less than 100% correct they were an “abomination”. that’s a bit harsher than just not completely correct. if God had told you that something was an “abomination” would you want to go anywhere near it?
 
ljahns,

If you are really such a humble seeker trying to find out about Mormonism, why not try asking questions that don’t sound like snide put-downs? Go back and read your earlier post. Do you really think it sounded like you were just asking about something that didn’t quite make sense to you?
OOps, I never claimed to be humble.(i unfortunately seem to lack that quality)😊
 
I was not in any way stating that the mob was justified. Mob mentality is usually aggressive and unreasonable. What I am saying is that he committed a crime, fled to avoid being arrested and when induced to turn himself in told his followers that he was going “as the lamb to the slaughter”. There is more to this quote but I don’t remember what it is. The jist is that he is going meekly to be martyred for his faith. Even though his “martyrdom” came at the hands of the mob instead, he reacted in anything but a fashion that he was dying for his faith like he claimed. It is said that when he was shot from the second story window, he had a gun in his hand and was using it. Funny way for a martyr to go in my opinion. Or am I wrong and the LDS does not consider him a martyr for his faith?
In addition to himself his brother and 2 close friends where also with him. To defend ones friends and family from being slaughtered for the crime of being in the same room with him hardly takes away from his martyr status. I have not been able to find the info I wanted yet, but the reigning I-net authority on all subjects Wiki 😃 says the JS was aquited on the printing press destruction chargers.

acceptable reason in my opinion.
 
Was that then the purpose of the vision from God to JS? I was under the impression that God had sent them to Canada to sell the copywrite. So did God get it wrong or did JS get it wrong?

You did not answer this one
 
I’m sorry but according to his vision they were not just less than 100% correct they were an “abomination”. that’s a bit harsher than just not completely correct. if God had told you that something was an “abomination” would you want to go anywhere near it?
Depends on what I’m doing with the “abomination” Christ hung out with many people who sinned often.
 
Thank you majick275. It seems BDawg finds a typo and discounts the whole post, not to mention makes an innuendo that I lied.
But I didn’t discount the entire post. I said, “So I don’t know whether Brigham Young said that, but I suspect that neither do you.” In other words, I did not discount the possibility that he said something like that. I discounted the possibility that you had bothered to check your source, or that you really cared that much whether your source was accurate. And now you had to have Majick (who actually does read books about LDS history) track down the source for you. So, Prodigal, did you actually check your source, or did you just copy it off of some anti-LDS web page? Maybe I’m wrong. 🙂

In any case, I looked up the source Majick provided, and I don’t see how this can be construed as a “prophecy”. Young was simply giving his interpretation of certain passages of scripture, which, it turns out, was exactly the same interpretation as most of the Protestants he grew up with. It’s really stretching to turn this into an “unfulfilled prophecy.”
 
ljahns;3907244:
Was that then the purpose of the vision from God to JS? I was under the impression that God had sent them to Canada to sell the copywrite. So did God get it wrong or did JS get it wrong?

You did not answer this one
sorry,

I think their where several reasons
  1. Restore the knowledge that God is alive and well and willing to be involved in the lives of his children.
  2. Teach the true nature of God in part that he looks like us or rahter us like him.
  3. To further the molding a a young man into a prophet.
I would say that neither got it wrong. God sent Moses to get get the Children of Israel out of bondage. It did not work the first try that does not mean that God or Moses was in error. Us mortals have a hard time understanding everything God wants us to do. Sometimes he provides some guidance to get us moving in the right direction and than provides more information to get us where we truly need to be even if it is different than what we started out doing. Abraham’s being told to sacrifice Issac is a classic example of this.
 
ljahns,

If you are really such a humble seeker trying to find out about Mormonism, why not try asking questions that don’t sound like snide put-downs? Go back and read your earlier post. Do you really think it sounded like you were just asking about something that didn’t quite make sense to you?
You know, I’ll be the first to admit this thread has gotten more than out of control, but surely you realize it’s a two way street.

I started in this discussion to share our beliefs without expectation of “converting” anyone, or being converted. I was looking forward to a straightforward “debate” on the subject. It was after I saw condescending, snide and other ad hominem type wording used that I fell into the “free-for-all” attitude.

Seriously, you are on a Catholic forum and I’ve seen our Church blatantly called a cult, apostate and lots of innuendos against my person, my faith and my Church, all used to inflame emotions rather than discuss points. I’ve seen it stated that there could be no compromise as it would compromise the mormon faith. This is not so. We know we disagree and can certainly do so without the use of disrespectful attacks.

It appears that if we ask “hard” questions or present points that, as you said, “stump” you, attacks or snide comments were used.

I’m all for returning to a “normal” discussion, or debate which is probably a better word, but I’ll leave that up to you. Expect hard questioning of your positions. Expect evidence that helps form our beliefs.

We are not uneducated, particularly about our faith, people who are easily led.

We are Catholics and Christ, through out Church, teaches us to Love one another. He goes beyond that by telling us to, Love your enemy. I for one do not consider us enemies, so surely we can love one another even though we disagree.

May the peace of the Lord be with you,
Prodigal Son1
 
Depends on what I’m doing with the “abomination” Christ hung out with many people who sinned often.
I still find it hard to believe that if God told him at age 14 that all churches were abominations in His Eyes that he would attend them. Especially at such a young age. imagine yourself in the same situation at the same age. i’d be terrified.
 
sorry,

I think their where several reasons
  1. Restore the knowledge that God is alive and well and willing to be involved in the lives of his children.
  2. Teach the true nature of God in part that he looks like us or rahter us like him.
  3. To further the molding a a young man into a prophet.
I would say that neither got it wrong. God sent Moses to get get the Children of Israel out of bondage. It did not work the first try that does not mean that God or Moses was in error. Us mortals have a hard time understanding everything God wants us to do. Sometimes he provides some guidance to get us moving in the right direction and than provides more information to get us where we truly need to be even if it is different than what we started out doing. Abraham’s being told to sacrifice Issac is a classic example of this.
There is no need for restoration. What the LDS teaches is contrary to what Jesus taught. Jesus also promised Peter that the gates of hell shall not prevail against the Church. The LDS like all other who claim to be the Church of Christ contradict Jesus Christ’s words. He also promise that he will be with us until the end of time. God is immutable or unchanging. What he teaches in faith and morals remains unchanged. This is only preserved in the Catholic Church, because the CC has the keys of the kingdom.

Jesus even warn us, “Even if an angel comes down from heaven and teaches something new, he is not from the Father.” (paraphrasing).
 
But I didn’t discount the entire post. I said, “So I don’t know whether Brigham Young said that, but I suspect that neither do you.” In other words, I did not discount the possibility that he said something like that. I discounted the possibility that you had bothered to check your source, or that you really cared that much whether your source was accurate. And now you had to have Majick (who actually does read books about LDS history) track down the source for you. So, Prodigal, did you actually check your source, or did you just copy it off of some anti-LDS web page? Maybe I’m wrong. 🙂

In any case, I looked up the source Majick provided, and I don’t see how this can be construed as a “prophecy”. Young was simply giving his interpretation of certain passages of scripture, which, it turns out, was exactly the same interpretation as most of the Protestants he grew up with. It’s really stretching to turn this into an “unfulfilled prophecy.”
I guess you missed my post where I stated I got it from a book, that I have right here with me now, and typed the information in. It was a typo.

As for your answer about Young giving his interpretation of scripture, a couple of verses came to my mind.
2Pe 1:20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
2Pe 1:21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.
Even though I think mormons think of Young as a holy man, I’m willing not to push you on this point, as I said earlier, I’m, however, anxious to see your response concerning Joseph Smith’s prophesies, as well as the “real” apostasy point I had questions about.

May the peace of the Lord be with you,
Prodigal Son1
 
In 1832, Smith predicted that before the generation that was then alive passed away, a mormon temple (the city “New Jerusalem”) would be built in Western Missouri (Doctrines and Covenants, 84). Over 160 years later, with everyone in that generation long dead, there was still no mormon temple there.
Hmmm. Actually, the prophecy says this:
“For verily this generation shall not all pass away until an house shall be built unto the Lord, and a cloud shall rest upon it, which cloud shall be even the glory of the Lord, which shall fill the house.” (D&C 84:4)
When Jesus prophesied about His Second Coming, he said,
“Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.” (Matt. 24:34)
It seems to me that you guys have a much worse problem than us on this score. We believe that John and some others were “translated,” meaning they were made immortal, so they could stay on Earth until the Second Coming. So really, some of the same generation that was around when Jesus was around are still here. Except that you don’t believe that, so I guess you’ll have to come up with some other way to get out of the problem you’ve brought up.😃
 
ljahns;3907532:
sorry,

I think their where several reasons
  1. Restore the knowledge that God is alive and well and willing to be involved in the lives of his children.
  2. Teach the true nature of God in part that he looks like us or rahter us like him.
  3. To further the molding a a young man into a prophet.
I would say that neither got it wrong. God sent Moses to get get the Children of Israel out of bondage. It did not work the first try that does not mean that God or Moses was in error. Us mortals have a hard time understanding everything God wants us to do. Sometimes he provides some guidance to get us moving in the right direction and than provides more information to get us where we truly need to be even if it is different than what we started out doing. Abraham’s being told to sacrifice Issac is a classic example of this.
Interesting and believable in that context.

Just out of curiosity are you a paid member of the LDS?
 
Hmmm. Actually, the prophecy says this:
“For verily this generation shall not all pass away until an house shall be built unto the Lord, and a cloud shall rest upon it, which cloud shall be even the glory of the Lord, which shall fill the house.” (D&C 84:4)
When Jesus prophesied about His Second Coming, he said,
“Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.” (Matt. 24:34)
It seems to me that you guys have a much worse problem than us on this score. We believe that John and some others were “translated,” meaning they were made immortal, so they could stay on Earth until the Second Coming. So really, some of the same generation that was around when Jesus was around are still here. Except that you don’t believe that, so I guess you’ll have to come up with some other way to get out of the problem you’ve brought up.😃
No problems here. Jesus’ prophesies were two fold in that chapter. I believe Jesus was foretelling the destruction of Jerusalem which happened before that generation passed. That happened in 70AD.

As for the second coming, go down 10 verses to 44.
Mat 24:44 Wherefore be you also ready, because at what hour you know not the Son of man will come.
Not sure if you know this or not, but Catholics do not believe the Bible to err anywhere. I am surprised to hear mormons accept that kind of thing though.

Now, I’ve explained my position. Where’s that temple Joseph spoke about? And, is Joseph Smith still alive? I’m pretty sure the second coming hasn’t happened yet. 😉

May the peace of the Lord be with you,
Prodigal Son1
 
I still find it hard to believe that if God told him at age 14 that all churches were abominations in His Eyes that he would attend them. Especially at such a young age. imagine yourself in the same situation at the same age. i’d be terrified.
I believe the term was their creeds where an abomination the individuals in the various churches had faith in Christ so there could still be a lot of good in them.

Nothing that cool happened to me when I was 14 so I can’t really say how I would have reacted.

I’m unsure how much he did or did not attend afterwards I don’t recall a specific reference to his continuing or stopping.

Still even knowing that I don’t agree with many peoples beliefs I talk to them I love to read all the church’s sign boards when I’m going around town.
 
Ok, so I was wrong about the web page. What was the book?
Beginning Apologetics 2: How to Answer Jehovah’s Witnesses and Mormons. By Fr. Frank Chacon and Jim Burnham. This is the primary book I’m using. I also have apologetic study cards and books by Scott Hahn, Patrick Madrid, etc. etc.

May the peace of the Lord be with you,
Prodigal Son1
 
Beginning Apologetics 2: How to Answer Jehovah’s Witnesses and Mormons. By Fr. Frank Chacon and Jim Burnham. This is the primary book I’m using. I also have apologetic study cards and books by Scott Hahn, Patrick Madrid, etc. etc.

May the peace of the Lord be with you,
Prodigal Son1
LDS doctrine on the nature of God is as incompatible with Natural Theology as is Atheism. The peep-stones, golden plates, sticking faces into hats, apostasy yarns are trivial matters when the LDS view of God is incoherent and self refuting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top