G
Gorgias
Guest
Certainly, although I disagree that it was “out of context”. You were responding to someone who asserted that priests live out a “vow of poverty.” You attempted to correct them by saying that priests don’t take vows. To my mind, that seemed to be easily misinterpreted to mean that while religious take vows, priests do no such thing. So, I added to your statement in order to point out that priests make promises (i.e., celibacy, obedience, prayer) as opposed to religious, who take vows.Please can you explain how taking a sentence out of context is conducive to fruitful discussion.
I wasn’t quoting you, I was quoting the Bible.As I do not have any recollection of saying this I wonder if you would be kind enough to refer me back to the post where I said this.
Of course, you seem to be asserting that, since the priesthood is a vocation, not a job, priests’ compensation shouldn’t reflect the value of their service. Hence my response.
No, I got your point. For some reason, you chose to compare priests (i.e., low wages) with doctors (i.e., high wages) in terms of their time commitments. How that’s relevant in this discussion, I’m at a loss to explain, especially since you’re attempting to argue that priests shouldn’t have stipends. Now, if you were pointing out another role that has both high time commitments and low salaries, then you’d be making an interesting point. As it is, your comparison seems to fall flat…You obviously missed the point. The point I made was that priests are not unique in the time commitment they make.