I
IGotQuestions
Guest
Two questions:
- Are Mormans Christian?
- Do they consider themselves Christian?
Yes, of course they call themselves Christians. Look at their name. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.Two questions:
- Are Mormans Christian?
- Do they consider themselves Christian?
Two questions:
- Are Mormans Christian?
- Do they consider themselves Christian?
There is much material on Mormonism on this Catholic Answers website.
- Yes, they consider their Church to be the only true Church, restored to Earth by Joseph Smith after the original Christian Church went apostate after the Apostles’ deaths.
- The Catholic Church does not consider Mormon baptisms to be valid Christian baptisms.
There is Christian behavior or morals which many LDS do well but then there is Christian theology which the LDS do not have. I may be wrong but I believe the OP is asking about theology.Their doctrines are considered a Christian heresy. But as to what is in the individual Mormon’s heart? Only God can judge them. I have seen Mormons who display agape love better than most “real” Christians. I don’t like getting into debates over whether an individual is a Christian or not. I’ve done that before, and I feel bad about it. I was judging, and who am I to judge? We are all sinners, trying to get through this life.
Why is it “moot?”Yes, of course they call themselves Christians. Look at their name. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
What other people who are not LDS say about them is moot.
Anyone who believes something other than the Doctrine and Dogma of the Church Christ established, the Catholic Church, believes heresy. All protestants believe heresy.Their doctrines are considered a Christian heresy.
Anyone who believes something other than the Doctrine and Dogma of the Church Christ established, the Catholic Church, believes heresy. All protestants believe heresy.
It’s a moot point because speaking on behalf of another person or tradition is offering an opinion/interpretation. Self definition, IMHO, trumps interpretation of the ‘other.’ The most we can say as non-LDS is that they don’t fall into the categories that we have determined.Why is it “moot?”
Would it be “moot” to hear, say, what Jesus or the Apostles would say about whether Mormons are Christian?
What does it mean to be “Christian,” according to you?
Merely making a claim to be “Christian” reduces every other voice to silence? Doesn’t that simply empty the word “Christian” of all possible meaning?
You do understand that in LDS theology, every god (including Jesus and the Father) were once human who essentially made themselves into gods? You do understand that any Mormon believer can become a god and populate planets somewhere in the universe?
You do understand that the basic Trinitarian doctrines (three Persons in one God) of Christianity from its very beginning are denied by the Mormon church?
I suppose it is also “their place” to appropriate the names and beliefs of established bodies and make claims about the correctness of those beliefs?It’s a moot point because speaking on behalf of another person or tradition is offering an opinion/interpretation. Self definition, IMHO, trumps interpretation of the ‘other.’ The most we can say as non-LDS is that they don’t fall into the categories that we have determined.
And yes, I do know LDS theology, and I know well that it isn’t mainstream Christian theology. However, they have declared that they are a Christian body, and we know that over time, they have grown in their doctrine and discipline. Non-Mormons can disagree and that is fine, but in the end, it’s their place to define who they are.
Non-Mormons can disagree and that is fine, but in the end, it’s their place to define who they are.
The irony here is that the word “Christian” wasn’t used by the early followers of Christ but by Romans and possibly Jews to identify the followers of “the Way.” It wasn’t used by followers of Christ in “their place to define who” they were, it was used “the other” about them.It’s a moot point because speaking on behalf of another person or tradition is offering an opinion/interpretation. Self definition, IMHO, trumps interpretation of the ‘other.’ The most we can say as non-LDS is that they don’t fall into the categories that we have determined.
Catholic heresy at any rate…Anyone who believes something other than the Doctrine and Dogma of the Church Christ established, the Catholic Church, believes heresy. All protestants believe heresy.
It’s done all the time. Every branch of Christianity that developed, for instance, in the Great Awakenings, did so. It isn’t theft; it is how our tradition creates branches.I suppose it is also “their place” to appropriate the names and beliefs of established bodies and make claims about the correctness of those beliefs?
How is this different from identity theft?
You have no problem taking a name that others have long (1800 years) called and identified themselves by and appropriating it by claiming the name and identity, with equal or greater merit, belongs to you?
You would have no problem with me taking your name, identifying as you and doing all kinds of things in your name?