Are most Jews really Jews?

  • Thread starter Thread starter angelusm
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I dont think so.
My orthodox jewish neighbor does not view a reform jewish convert as a true jew.
Reading CA forums one gets a similar impression about Catholics and Cafeteria Catholics.
So it is my understanding that sect views what a jew is differently
Non-Orthodox are merely naughty Jews.
 
Oh but was it formed by the UN??:nope:
Mussolini.
I want a special place mandated by the UN just for Catholics:D
And what about muslims,
Pakistan. See how well that’s worked?
Called India. They’ve had to ban conversions, because Hindus converting.
buddhists etc.??
India was a Buddhist empire (Asoka, whose pillar is a symbol of India). It went back to Hinduism.

On whether Jews are competent to decide who is a Jew, the battles in Jerusalem on the issue cast doubt.

Many Jews, if your mother wasn’t Jewish, will not accept you as a Jew, no matter who observant you are (the Talmud says they have to pray “O God of their fathers,” not “our”). I know many Orthodox Jews (by observance, belief) who had to convert to Conservative Judaism over this.

On the reverse, if your mother was Jewish, no matter how much you are baptized and go to communion, they consider you Jewish.🤷
 
As far as I’m concerned, vast majority of “Jews” are not Jews, they are Khazars, ancestors of a Turkic tribe that accepted judaism as their religion and became “Ashkenazi Jews”. As a result, can they call themselves the chosen nation? Do they have the moral right to rule Palestine if most of them have no semitic origin?
Who cares what jews are. They have the moral right to rule palestine because they conquered it fair and square. Many a nation are results of conquest. Like the turkish nation…stolen from the greeks. USA- stolen from native americans.
 
Who cares what jews are. They have the moral right to rule palestine because they conquered it fair and square. Many a nation are results of conquest. Like the turkish nation…stolen from the greeks. USA- stolen from native americans.
Conquered, is that what we call what the UN did?
 
Conquered, is that what we call what the UN did?
Its debatable on whether or not the UN had a right to partition a land belonging to a people who occupied it for more than a thousand years. Regardless, after the 1948 war the arabs lost a lot of its UN partitioned land to the jews. Their conquest backfired and they got conquered instead. Fair & square. Eh?
 
Not that long ago, there were an awful lot of Catholic countries - the whole idea seems to have gone completely out of fashion with the people who live in them though - except Poland and Ireland, though even the Irish seem a bit wobbly.
The same UN that gave Israel to the Jews also made “land grabs” during war illegal. They’ve also made puting up settlements on Palestinian land illegal. In fact Israel has flouted more UN resolutions than Iraq, Iran, and North Korea combined.
*
"During the period between 1967 and 2000, Iraq was the subject of 69 Security Council resolutions. By comparison, Israel, our closest “ally” in the Middle East, has been the subject of 138 resolutions. Not surprisingly, most of those resolutions call upon Israel to comply with basic principles of international law embodied by the UN Charter. Many of them condemn actions taken by Israel and call upon Israel on more than one occasion to comply with previous resolutions that Israel ignored and continues to ignore to this day. "*

“(The Council) Determines that the policy and practices of Israel in establishing settlements in the Palestinian and Arab territories occupied since 1967 have no legal validity and constitute a serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive and lasting peace in the Middle East; Calls once more upon Israel, as the occupying power, to abide scrupulously by the 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention, to rescind it’s previous measures and to desist from taking any action which would result in changing the legal status and geographical nature and materially affecting the demographic composition of the Arab territories occupied since 1967, including Jerusalem, and in particular, not to transfer parts of its own civilian population into the occupied Arab territories.”

mediamonitors.net/michaelsladah&suleimaniajlouni1.html
 
fine. I did a little studying:

Despite recent contrary genetic evidence[10] , and a lack of any real mainstream scholarly support, this belief is still popular among groups such as the Christian Identity Movement, Black Hebrews, British Israelitists and others who claim that they are the descendants of Israel instead of the Jews and seek to downplay the connection between the Jewish people and their Israelite ancestors.

You said it right there - “despite recent contrary genetic evidence”. Thread solved 🙂
 
The same UN that gave Israel to the Jews also made “land grabs” during war illegal. They’ve also made puting up settlements on Palestinian land illegal. In fact Israel has flouted more UN resolutions than Iraq, Iran, and North Korea combined.
I’m sure that that’s terribly, terribly interesting and I’m sure you’re very, very cross about it but what’s that got to do with what I’ve written?

You want to argue about Israel, find an Israeli, I’m a European.
 
As far as I’m concerned, vast majority of “Jews” are not Jews, they are Khazars, ancestors of a Turkic tribe that accepted judaism as their religion and became “Ashkenazi Jews”.
So in your opinion, was Jesus born of Jews or Khazars?
 
I’m sure that that’s terribly, terribly interesting and I’m sure you’re very, very cross about it but what’s that got to do with what I’ve written?

You want to argue about Israel, find an Israeli, I’m a European.
Ooooh sorry to hear that…

Relax I quoted the wrong person obviously…
 
I’m sure that that’s terribly, terribly interesting and I’m sure you’re very, very cross about it but what’s that got to do with what I’ve written?
Bunny sorry Kaninchen, he more than likely quoted the wrong post.
You want to argue about Israel, find an Israeli, I’m a European.
But isn’t Israel all about/ all for people of Israeli descent? Or am I mistaken only Israelies in Israel are concerned about Israel?
 
Bunny sorry Kaninchen, he more than likely quoted the wrong post.

But isn’t Israel all about/ all for people of Israeli descent? Or am I mistaken only Israelies in Israel are concerned about Israel?
If I/we wanted to be Israeli, we’d move to Israel - Aliyah has never been a temptation. Quite why people think that, because somebody is Jewish, they can’t wait to discuss the subject, I can’t imagine.

Just so you know . . .

Do I think that Israel should have a right to exist? - Yes

Do I agree with Israeli policy? - Sometimes

What do I think of the settlements (ie ‘Greater Israel’)? - Get out the bulldozers

OK?

That’s my lot on the subject of Israel.
 
If I/we wanted to be Israeli, we’d move to Israel - Aliyah has never been a temptation. Quite why people think that, because somebody is Jewish, they can’t wait to discuss the subject, I can’t imagine.

Just so you know . . .

Do I think that Israel should have a right to exist? - Yes

Do I agree with Israeli policy? - Sometimes

What do I think of the settlements (ie ‘Greater Israel’)? - Get out the bulldozers

OK?
Ok Bunny, sorry for touching a sore spot!
😊
 
Ok Bunny, sorry for touching a sore spot!
😊
In another discussion, I told you that I don’t do Israel. It’s not a ‘sore spot’, just tiring to be expected to go through the rituals of ‘pro-Israeli’/‘anti-Israeli’ argument.
 
In another discussion, I told you that I don’t do Israel. It’s not a ‘sore spot’, just tiring to be expected to go through the rituals of ‘pro-Israeli’/‘anti-Israeli’ argument.
My bad … so sorry I did not remember 🤷
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top