Are Pope Francis and the US bishops split? Don't believe the critics. [CNA]

  • Thread starter Thread starter CNA_News
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

CNA_News

Guest
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/i...sservatore_Romano_CNA_6_24_15.jpgPhiladelphia, Pa., Sep 3, 2015 / 04:02 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Ahead of the papal visit to the U.S., some critics have painted a narrative pitting Pope Francis against the “conservative” American bishops – but the Archbishop of Philadelphia doesn’t believe them.

Claims that that Church ignores the poor while obsessing over things like abortion and human sexuality are nothing new to members of the Catholic hierarchy, not even to the Pope himself, Archbishop Charles Chaput of Philadelphia said in a recent column.

“When Francis was an archbishop in Buenos Aires, Argentine political leaders reviled him publicly as ‘the leader of the opposition,’” Archbishop Chaput said. “When he defended Church teaching on issues like sexuality and marriage, they accused him of conducting ‘an inquisition.’”

The archbishop said critics claim the United States’ Catholic bishops, especially the “conservative” ones, spend too much time tackling issues such as religious freedom and the sanctity of human life while ignoring the poor and needy.

But nothing could be further from the truth, the archbishop continued. While the Church will continue to call for the respect of human life and religious freedom, dioceses across the U.S. spend substantially more in terms of dollars and manpower on caring for the poor and needy.

“If there’s anything ‘lopsided’ about the real witness of the Catholic Church in Philadelphia, it’s weighted heavily in favor of the poor. It always has been. And that’s the reality in nearly every diocese in the United States,” he said. “But it’s not a fact that fits comfortably into a storyline of ‘compassionate Pope Francis vs. conservative American bishops.’”

Each year, the Archdiocese of Philadelphia alone spends $4.2 million of privately donated funds caring for the homeless, battered women, people with disabilities and immigrants. On top of that another $100 million in public funding go towards similar efforts.

By comparison, fewer than 200 of the 1,600 full time employees for archdiocesan social ministries work in parenting, family and pregnancy services. The archdiocese spends less than $200,000 on “sanctity of life, family and laity” issues.

The archbishop said he hopes Pope Francis will see “how the American Church really conducts her mission” and learn “that American Catholics in general, and Philadelphia Catholics in a very special way, love and support him wholeheartedly.”

“I hope he sees that there’s tremendous good in our country, and a lot of it began here in Philadelphia, where our nation was born,” he said.

feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/catholicnewsagency/dailynews?d=yIl2AUoC8zA
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/catholicnewsagency/dailynews/~4/PEThs0nj5ts

Full article…
 
My pastor and bishop are two of the most orthodox men you will ever meet, very pro-life, extremely liturgically correct; my bishop is supportive of the EF and true sacred music. But they both speak warmly of the Holy Father, they quote him extensively, they wholeheartedly support his mission, and are completely obedient without losing any of the conservatism for which they are so well-loved.
 
I’ve noticed that the people I know who claim the church does nothing to the poor aren’t poor and don’t go to church. So they just don’t see it happening.

Also, the US media loves conflict, so they’ll always create some to make a story.
 

Also, the US media loves conflict, so they’ll always create some to make a story.
Rules for Journalists:
  1. Exploit controversy.
  2. If there is no controversy, create it, then see Rule #1.
The problem as I see it is that critics look upon the Church as a governing institution in lieu of a teaching institution. Christ’s last command to his apostles was, “go forth and teach,” not “go forth and govern.”
 
Rules for Journalists:
  1. Exploit controversy.
  2. If there is no controversy, create it, then see Rule #1.
The problem as I see it is that critics look upon the Church as a governing institution in lieu of a teaching institution. Christ’s last command to his apostles was, “go forth and teach,” not “go forth and govern.”
Right, because controversy is exciting, and excitement draws consumers, and consumers draw advertising revenue. I’ve always said that Howard Stern would read Bible verses if he could make $millions by doing it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top