A
anon1234567
Guest
I live in the UK so we still have meatless fridays. Is scampi (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scampi) okay too?
This is not correct.The reason for abstaining from meat on Fridays is to deprive yourself of something good so if you adore prawns (as I do), you’re not really fulfilling the requirements.
In the UK, it is abstention from meat-- the bishops reinstated this recently and do not allow a different penance as substitute as is the case in some other countries.The Church does still recommend abstaining from meat on Fridays but even if you don’t, she requires you to substitute another type of penance. We’re not being reminded of that anymore.
Prawns, scampi, etc, are not meat. They are seafood.I live in the UK so we still have meatless fridays. Is scampi (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scampi) okay too?
The substitution of another type of penance when eating meat on Friday is still being taught in both RCIA and CCD. It is also in the Catechism.The reason for abstaining from meat on Fridays is to deprive yourself of something good so if you adore prawns (as I do), you’re not really fulfilling the requirements. The Church doesn’t require you to eat fish as a replacement though. You can have any kind of meatless substitute as it is about abstaining from meat. The Church does still recommend abstaining from meat on Fridays but even if you don’t, she requires you to substitute another type of penance. We’re not being reminded of that anymore.
As it shoud be in the US, where you are.The substitution of another type of penance when eating meat on Friday is still being taught in both RCIA and CCD. It is also in the Catechism.
Just as a piece of information here though that the OP had mentioned but that some might not be aware of, it is now binding in England and Wales that meatless Fridays are to be observed without substitute.The Church does still recommend abstaining from meat on Fridays but even if you don’t, she requires you to substitute another type of penance.
You’d be surprised by the number of Catholics (where I live) that think that eating fish on Fridays is the rule… rather than abstaining from meat. It’s just one of those subtle shifts, (probably promoted by the seafood industry).The substitution of another type of penance when eating meat on Friday is still being taught in both RCIA and CCD. It is also in the Catechism.
I understand that to be a reason but the first and literal reason is to quiet the fleshly desires. St Thomas Aquinas wrote…This is not correct.
The requirement is to abstain from meat. Prawns are not meat. We abstain from meat because Christ gave up his flesh for the life of the world.
You don’t have meatless Fridays in the UK. It is strongly recommended to abstain from meat but it is not obligatory. Any form of penance will suffice.I live in the UK so we still have meatless fridays. Is scampi (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scampi) okay too?
Welcome to the club. I love fried calamari but this Friday I did not enjoy them as I normally would because I really liked the idea of something that I should not eat (e.g. italian cold cuts sandwich).As someone in the US who abstains from meat on Friday, I can say that while it might seem that eating prawns/shrimp isn’t truly in the spirit of things, it’s not quite correct. Every Friday I get cravings for burgers, spaghetti and meatballs, etc. While I love seafood, on Fridays I love meat more.
Really? Has this statement, of the bishops’ conference of England and Wales, been reversed? “the Bishops’ Conference wishes to remind all Catholics in England and Wales of the obligation of Friday Penance. The Bishops have decided to re-establish the practice that this should be fulfilled by abstaining from meat. Those who cannot or choose not to eat meat as part of their normal diet should abstain from some other food of which they regularly partake. This is to come into effect from Friday 16 September 2011 when we will mark the anniversary of the visit of Pope Benedict XVI to the United Kingdom.”You don’t have meatless Fridays in the UK. It is strongly recommended to abstain from meat but it is not obligatory. Any form of penance will suffice.
Hmm… is this a relevant quote, though? In the context you’ve cited, Thomas is answering a different sort of question: for those who fast, and who take only one meal a day during their fast, should they abstain from meat in that little meal? That’s a different sort of question than the one we’re considering, isn’t it, since we’re only asking about abstinence, not fasting, per se…I understand that to be a reason but the first and literal reason is to quiet the fleshly desires. St Thomas Aquinas wrote…
“Fasting was instituted by the Church in order to bridle the concupiscences of the flesh, which regard pleasures of touch in connection with food and sex. Wherefore the Church forbade those who fast to partake of those foods which both afford most pleasure to the palate, and besides are a very great incentive to lust. Such are the flesh of animals that take their rest on the earth, and of those that breath the air and their products, such as milk and eggs.” (ST II-II, q. 147, a.8)