Are pro-choicers worse than Holocaust deniers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ribozyme
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Just like many Nazis “truly believed” that Jews were sub-humans.

Except that they commit or support murder.

But that’s a far cry from commiting or supporting murder.
Sorry. Perhaps you misunderstood me. I was trying to point out that there are differences in people’s opinions about many things. You know what they say about opinions… like a certain part of the anatomy, everyone has one and most of them stink.

People can believe a certain way for many reasons, or no reason at all. Still, they have that belief. This is regardless of whether or not that belief is moral or not, philosophically sound or not, reasonable or not, logically consistent or not.

For example, there are varied opinions about the role of the Supreme Court of the United States. There are some who argue that the Court should only interpret the written word of the constitution. There are others who may argue that the Court should promote the Founders intent… as they see it.

These views can be argued back and forth… and undoubtably (sp?), some views are better supported, logical, and reasoned than others.

However, regardless of one’s view on what the Supreme Court should be or do, it is something entirely different than stating that the United States didn’t really have a Supreme Court until 1856. That’s just ignorance of history… or deliberate disengenuity.
 
Sorry. Perhaps you misunderstood me. I was trying to point out that there are differences in people’s opinions about many things. You know what they say about opinions… like a certain part of the anatomy, everyone has one and most of them stink.
And if someone is particularly interested in someone else’s and he isn’t a proctologist - - watch out!😛
People can believe a certain way for many reasons, or no reason at all. Still, they have that belief. This is regardless of whether or not that belief is moral or not, philosophically sound or not, reasonable or not, logically consistent or not.
Serial killers often truly believe they have a right to kill. But murder isn’t the sort of thing where we shrug and say, “Well, I wouldn’t do it, but if you think it’s okay . . .”

Many Germans, for example, probably really believed Jews were sub-humans (“untermenschen.”) But that didn’t make the Holocaust any less evil.
For example, there are varied opinions about the role of the Supreme Court of the United States. There are some who argue that the Court should only interpret the written word of the constitution. There are others who may argue that the Court should promote the Founders intent… as they see it.
Is there anyone who argues the Court should legalize murder?
These views can be argued back and forth… and undoubtably (sp?), some views are better supported, logical, and reasoned than others.

However, regardless of one’s view on what the Supreme Court should be or do, it is something entirely different than stating that the United States didn’t really have a Supreme Court until 1856. That’s just ignorance of history… or deliberate disengenuity.
Who said that!:confused:
 
While very ignorant, holocaust deniers do not cause the deaths of innocent people. Abortion is infinitely more evil than holocaust denial.

That said, most average pro-choicers are not evil, but just very ignorant (like holocaust deniers). If shown the proper information they will see the light. The truly evil ones are the “doctors” who perform the abortions, the leading figures of pro-choice organizations, and the women who get the abortions.
 
While very ignorant, holocaust deniers do not cause the deaths of innocent people. Abortion is infinitely more evil than holocaust denial.
Absolutely
That said, most average pro-choicers are not evil, but just very ignorant (like holocaust deniers). If shown the proper information they will see the light. The truly evil ones are the “doctors” who perform the abortions, the leading figures of pro-choice organizations, and the women who get the abortions.
Yes – but like the Germans who saw the cattle cars full of starving people rattle through their towns every day, and “never realized” what was happening, those who deliberately wear blindfolds have some moral responsibility.
 
Absolutely

Yes – but like the Germans who saw the cattle cars full of starving people rattle through their towns every day, and “never realized” what was happening, those who deliberately wear blindfolds have some moral responsibility.
This reminds me vaguely…correct me if I’m wrong…but wasn’t there a story going around about a group of people who would gather a small town together for an evening of singing and dancing…the intent of this “night out” was to mask the noise of the suffering people in the trains as they passed by the town.

Has anyone heard of this?
 
This reminds me vaguely…correct me if I’m wrong…but wasn’t there a story going around about a group of people who would gather a small town together for an evening of singing and dancing…the intent of this “night out” was to mask the noise of the suffering people in the trains as they passed by the town.

Has anyone heard of this?
I have not – but I know there were towns where they could not only see the smoke of the crematoria, they could smell it when the wind was right.
 
That said, most average pro-choicers are not evil, but just very ignorant (like holocaust deniers). If shown the proper information they will see the light.
Which is why there is a compelling need to bring the actual nature of this evil crime to light through visual means so that it this veil of ignorance is removed.
 
Which is why there is a compelling need to bring the actual nature of this evil crime to light through visual means so that it this veil of ignorance is removed.
Which will be greeted by cries of “Inappropriate!” (The worst crime you can commit is to be “Inappropriate!” you know.)😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top