Are Protestants bothered by the gazillion denominations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnnyjones
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A Christianity that has no denomination in Protestant circles has even greater obstacles. You read a text, and use your own interpretation “skills” to decipher the meaning. It gets closer and closer to saying, "this is how I will make God ", even subconsciously.
 
A bundle of sticks bound together is stronger then a single rod. Look what is going on with the Bishops who did not slap down their lawyers arguing that a fetus is not a child to save a Catholic hospital in a law suit. Under the single rod theory since nobody stepped in to overrule the local guys the entire rod breaks in the public eye instead of just a single branch with the strength of the other branches keeping the whole strong.
 
=CMatt25;10279549]This actually sounds familiar to me. I see the Catholic Church becoming more and more the same way. I’ve seen on CAF Catholics who vote a certain way and don’t keep it mum are told they can’t be Catholics.
Not “CAN"T BE” But facually ARE NOT by there actions:)

Sacramental Cconfession; true remorse and a committment NOT to repeat the sin will get them back into God’s Graces.😃
 
=CMatt25;10283667]😛 But that can’t be right. The person who said it was voluntary is a Catholic and CMatt’s listed religion isn’t.
3 reasons:
  1. The issue we agree in a matter of “church practice” which is changable [mandated Fasting]
  2. “Church Practices” are controllable and changable by the Local Ordinary within his Diocease; and the USCCB [The Body of Bishops] can collectively mandate or dispense and or chage practices; that don’t touch on the sacred Liturgy; but never Doctrines or Dogmas
3… it is possible [but all too seldom seen] that non- Catholics do agree with a specific issue of Catholic teaching:)
 
“it is possible [but all too seldom seen] that non- Catholics do agree with a specific issue of Catholic teaching.”

True; and I am not referring to those that are remarkably similar to begin with; Anglican, Eastern, etc…

Apostolic Sucession, Transubstantiation to name just two.
And there are those, who, upon learning of the Catholic faith more diligently, agree with many more, but see how they could appreciate the differences and also the possibility of more closure between the two.
 
Then may I ask if it is completely voluntary why am I reading in front of me the 6 traditional precepts of the Catholic Church and #2 is to fast and abstain on the days appointed? In explaining what that means it goes on to speak of days of obligatory abstinence.
You are absolutely right. My apologies. For some reason I thought it changed after Vatican II, but it only changed to being required during Lent. I believe we are now required to go back to every Friday.

I haven’t paid that much attention to the particular precept as I started fasting, rather than “abstaining”, years ago when I witnessed my whole parish and half the town gorge themselves on fried fish, potatoes, hush puppies, cole slaw, cake and ice cream. It seemed to me that this was no sacrifice whatsoever, so I haven’t been to a fish fry in years. I think I’ll stick to fish on Fridays outside of Lent and continue fasting during Lent. Wouldn’t want to get too pious, you know.
 
Yes really. You obviously choose to overlook the part about me saying there is one ultimate truth. I just don’t believe we can know with 100% absolute certainty what it is, without faith that we do.
Nor do I. We believe with faith, the teachings of the Church, because we believe that Jesus Christ was who he said he was and therefore we believe he keeps his promises concerning his Church. So we believe, with the eyes of faith, that the Church was given the ultimate revelation of truth in the person of Jesus Christ, who is Truth himself. We believe that Jesus, who promised to remain with his Church until the end of time, and the Holy Spirit, who Jesus promised to send to guide the Church into all truth have prevented error from entering the doctrines and teachings of the Church. So we don’t have to wonder about the truth, it doesn’t change; it is not relative. It is found in the Church because Christ, who is Truth, is in the Church.
 
There’s a difference between knowing and *believing *we know.
Absolutely!
And I don’t believe irregardless of what someone believes that they will be saved. Obviously someone is right. Someone is wrong. Or perhaps no human has everything right.
No human can have everything right, but Christ does have everything right and he is the head of the Church. We need Christ’s Church for the very reason that we don’t have everything right. If we trust Jesus Christ then we must trust his Church to which he gave his own authority and commanded it to teach all nations. This is the reason that Christ’s original Church is so important. Those started by men, as you say, don’t have everything right which is the cause of so much division.
I certainly don’t presume I do. Nor even that I’m for certain going to make it to heaven. I pray I do.
And I pray that I meet you there.
I believe Christ died for my sins and is my Lord and Savior. I live in hope He finds the life I live warrants obtaining eternal life with Him someday. I’ll have to wait until in faith though I face Him upon my death or His 2nd Coming whichever occurs first. And leave myself to His infinite understanding and mercy before I know for sure if He unlocks the door to heaven for me with His key.

The evidence anyone has is faith.
Sounds very Catholic. 🙂
 
Jan 18, 2011

Watch the testimony of a former Methodist pastor and a Baptist preacher, and how he had a ‘Rood Awakening’.

youtu.be/Y75LMMJRf2o

it is easy to deceive your self with scripture commentary
 
If you’re a Protestant and you say yes to the original question then doesn’t that make you a hypocrite?
 
I am a former Protestant (Catholic revert). I never really dwelled on the fact that there were so many denominations with all kinds of beliefs , sub beliefs and doctrines. I knew they were there but my adverse “feelings” toward the Catholic church caused me to bury it or justify it.

I’m curious. How do my devout Protestant friends feel about the multitude of denominations there are? Yes, your particular denomination has an authority but there is really no collective protestant authority unless you are going to just say the bible or Jesus. But the problem there is different translations so it is not unified in belief and understanding.

Do you as a Protestant think there are too many denominations and/or denominations that should not be? I’d like a Catholic perspective as well.
This always seemed trivial to me. Mainly because in every religion, in every denomination you have diversity. There are different worship styles within protestant churches. Different liturgy. Different languages, so different culture. There are different worship styles even within the Catholic Church. There are different ‘denominations’ even. Different rites within. There are definitely different opinions in the Catholic Church, just like the protestants. Look at the forums and you will read the different views. I can read something on here about purgatory and then go to work the next day and ask my catholic co-worker a question and the answer will be quite different. I think the issue is what unites the different protestant groups. Most likely it is sola fide, sola gracia. “Grace + Works” to a protestant is a catholic belief. If a protestant does believe they have to cooperate then really they are just a would be catholic going to a protestant church, I suppose. Which in today’s day, is very possible. I think ultimately, it is SIN. Sinful man is full of pride. I want to worship this way. You don’t worship this way so I don’t like it. I’ll go over to this congregation who believes what I do and worships the way I want. God did create diversity and we can be thankful for that, but man has a tendency to ruin what God made good. Too many denominations whether it is Catholic, EO, or Protestant. One day Christ will change that in a blink of an eye. I just look to the heavens and say ‘Maranatha’!
 
While staying in the USA in 1980’ies I certainly felt that the number of protestant denominations was bewildering, and some of the TV evangelists sounded - well, I must say comical. Apparently the historical heritage of the USA (in many ways commendable) as a refuge of every persecuted or discriminated sect of Europe has something to do with it.

In Europe the historical protestant churches; Lutherans, Anglicans and Reformed (Calvinists) represent much more monolithic systems of belief, the vast majority of protestant Christians sticking to their doctrins. Not that in particular the Lutherans and Calvinists have had it doctrinally very cosy, through most of the history (look at the Wikipedia the life history of Paul Gerhardt, a great 17th Century Lutheran divine, and a very sympathetic man).

Well, the consequence of Reformation was a split in Western Christianity. If something good came from it, it was the idea of religious freedom, that the state should not interfere with the religious convictions of the people. And this after Europe had bled and suffered enormously as the result of religious wars and mutual oppression. Now, thank God, people have their beliefs by choice, and not because they are imposed on them.

In Finland (then part of Sweden) the Reformation passed without great dissension. Not a single person was burned on the stake. A couple of Jesuits were executed, but mainly because they were plotting against the protestant king. Finland was a country where the churches were few and far between, and the Catholic Church had not done very much to evangelize the country folks, who remained as baptized pagans with very much of their old beliefs, old deities and sacrifices. I must admire the zeal of the first generations of Lutheran clergy, when they undertook the Christianization of their people. At the end of 17th century we knew our creed, the ten commandments, the Lord’s prayer, and, indeed, we could read, and we had the Bible translated to Finnish to read. What ever I think of the excesses of reformation elsewhere, I think that it was God’s great mercy to my country.
 
If you’re a Protestant and you say yes to the original question then doesn’t that make you a hypocrite?
Why would that make me a hypocrite? I recognize Christ’s call that al may be one. I recognize that the division between us (division is not, after all, one way) is the result of human sin. I pray regularly for reconciliation of ther Church Militant. I may well be a hypocrite, which makes me just like any other Christian, ISTM.

Jon
 
This always seemed trivial to me. Mainly because in every religion, in every denomination you have diversity. There are different worship styles within protestant churches. Different liturgy. Different languages, so different culture. There are different worship styles even within the Catholic Church. There are different ‘denominations’ even. Different rites within. There are definitely different opinions in the Catholic Church, just like the protestants. Look at the forums and you will read the different views. I can read something on here about purgatory and then go to work the next day and ask my catholic co-worker a question and the answer will be quite different. I think the issue is what unites the different protestant groups. Most likely it is sola fide, sola gracia. “Grace + Works” to a protestant is a catholic belief. If a protestant does believe they have to cooperate then really they are just a would be catholic going to a protestant church, I suppose. Which in today’s day, is very possible. I think ultimately, it is SIN. Sinful man is full of pride. I want to worship this way. You don’t worship this way so I don’t like it. I’ll go over to this congregation who believes what I do and worships the way I want. God did create diversity and we can be thankful for that, but man has a tendency to ruin what God made good. Too many denominations whether it is Catholic, EO, or Protestant. One day Christ will change that in a blink of an eye. I just look to the heavens and say ‘Maranatha’!
Truthfully though, what people say is not always accurate. And, as you said it is opinion. It does ultimately boil down to the issue of authority. i maean a Catholic can run around saying all kinds of things but confronted with the cathechism or ex catherdra from the pope, what can they really say? “I disagree” is about it.

Protestants as you know would say they are one body in Christ, but the views are all over the place with a definitive answer lying only in the particular denomination of the governing body (and in many cases themselves- non denominational).
 
Truthfully though, what people say is not always accurate. And, as you said it is opinion. It does ultimately boil down to the issue of authority. i maean a Catholic can run around saying all kinds of things but confronted with the cathechism or ex catherdra from the pope, what can they really say? “I disagree” is about it.

Protestants as you know would say they are one body in Christ, but the views are all over the place with a definitive answer lying only in the particular denomination of the governing body (and in many cases themselves- non denominational).
Well, I’d say you are part of that one body, too. But frankly, I don’t see any effective difference between my responsibility to hold to the Lutheran confessions and my synod than your responsibility to the Magisterium.

Jon
 
There are different worship styles even within the Catholic Church.
Yes. The Catholic Church is truly the “universal” Church. It covers the entire world and so envelopes many nations and cultures. There are different styles and even some variation in liturgy between the different rites. But it is the same Mass and there is no difference there. Only the rubrics change, not the substance of the liturgy. This is very unlike the diiferences between Protestant denominations.
There are different ‘denominations’ even.
No. There are not different denominations within Catholicism. To “denominate” literally means to “remove one’s name”. You remove your name when you reject the doctrines and teachings of the Catholic Church, which is not a denomination. It is the Church from which the rest removed their names (denominated).
Different rites within.
Yes. All of them quite beautiful.
There are definitely different opinions in the Catholic Church, just like the protestants.
Individual opinions have no affect whatsoever upon the doctrines and teachings of the Catholic Church, very unlike Protestants. Catholics are obligated to believe all that the Church teaches and holds to be true. Or they are free to go start another Protestant “church”.
Look at the forums and you will read the different views. I can read something on here about purgatory and then go to work the next day and ask my catholic co-worker a question and the answer will be quite different.
No one has control over the answers one may receive from an individual Catholic. That is why the Church publishes things like the Catechism of the Catholic Church. There should be no mystery whatsoever in what the Church believes and teaches and it is available for any and all to read if they are really interested.
God did create diversity and we can be thankful for that, but man has a tendency to ruin what God made good.
Yes, God created diversity but he did not create chaos.
I just look to the heavens and say ‘Maranatha’!
Some days so do I. 🙂 But don’t you think that it is important now, in this life, to find the truth? Christ started a Church and promised to remain with that Church until the end of time. That we know very plainly from Scripture. That means that this Church must be alive and well today. The fact that Christ started a Church makes it all important that we find that Church and remove ourselves from the world of individual conflicting opinions. Paul said that the Church is the pillar and foundation of truth. We can have it, right here, right now.
 
Yes. The Catholic Church is truly the “universal” Church. It covers the entire world and so envelopes many nations and cultures. There are different styles and even some variation in liturgy between the different rites. But it is the same Mass and there is no difference there. Only the rubrics change, not the substance of the liturgy. This is very unlike the diiferences between Protestant denominations.

This is true, but every protestant denomination (unless they are apostate or a cult, etc…) is going to ultimately hold Christ as their head. Which is why a protestant considers and believes they are part of the One Body of Christ, aside fron the chaotic protestant “churches” which are not part of the body.
No. There are not different denominations within Catholicism. To “denominate” literally means to “remove one’s name”. You remove your name when you reject the doctrines and teachings of the Catholic Church, which is not a denomination. It is the Church from which the rest removed their names (denominated).
 
SteveVH;10298079:
Yes. The Catholic Church is truly the “universal” Church. It covers the entire world and so envelopes many nations and cultures. There are different styles and even some variation in liturgy between the different rites. But it is the same Mass and there is no difference there. Only the rubrics change, not the substance of the liturgy. This is very unlike the diiferences between Protestant denominations.

This is true, but every protestant denomination (unless they are apostate or a cult, etc…) is going to ultimately hold Christ as their head. Which is why a protestant considers and believes they are part of the One Body of Christ, aside fron the chaotic protestant “churches” which are not part of the body.
Excuse my wording. I understand the meaning of ‘denomination’ and that their are differences in how peoplpe understand the word. I probaby should not have used it in this context, but I meant to imply was that their are differences in the culture, and even worship styles, etc. (I dont know how you feel about the different types of Catholic churches. The different names and those who oppose the pope or his teachings. It can be confusing sometimes)

Your first sentence is true b/c the pope/magisterium is seen as the head, correct? Christ is the head of His church and a protestant church is required to use the Word of God as the guide book and the inquiry of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit as their tool to carry out the gospel. They are called to be faithful to that word. Once again this is where sinful, finite minds come into play.

This is understood by me. It’s just unfortunate my co-workers don’t care enough to understand their religion.

I agree. But once again, sinful, finite, man ruins the good. What the non-denom church does down the street will have to be accounted for when Christ comes to take His own. Churches that say they are part of the Body and really are not will be judged. I am on this earth to glorify Him until that day comes and to do it faithfully according to what God says. I find His own words to be very helpful in that. I attend a church that is faithful to the word of God. I am not on this thread to defend all “protestant” churches because frankly there are plenty of “protestant” churches that are not part of the body of Christ. I cannot save anyone, so I first and foremost I am responsible for my own beliefs.

I do all days. 🙂 That does not mean that I am sitting on my backside, looking to the heavens and waiting. I am called to spread the gospel, to spread His love and charity, to tell others that Christ is the ONLY way, the truth and the life and you don’t get to be with Him unless you believe that. He is our Redeemer, Savior and Friend. God is not a God of chaos. Those who are part of the body of true believers recognize that.

I agree.

Now, I suppose to answer the question ‘does it bother me’. I would say yes, of course. Sin bothers me. I started with it is ‘trivial’ to me because the question is trivial to me personally. Maybe not others. Whether you are Catholic, EO, Pentecostal, Baptist, or any other religion, there is sin. Man falls prey to it. Every man. Thanks for your time SteveVH. :)I don’t understand what you mean. Man falls prey to sin, yes of course. All denominations are sin? But you don’t belong to any according to your “religion”.

To help you. The question means, if you are Protestant, you belong to a body of people that are also Protestants but believe differently than your own denomination. If there were multiple Catholic beliefs , one might ask if that is a conflict. A question such as this could not be trivial.
 
today’s roman catholic church is not the same as the 1st century church Jesus and the apostiles layed the ground work… one example is the inclusion of Man-Made cerymonies
and rituals

and some how the deception is that God will bless these ceremony’s

and all of the sister churches who follow this are just as confused –

Christianity as we know it today is a break-off from Catholicism with a good deal of false and pagan teaching.

Most of which was put in place through the mandate of Constantine.

This is what Constantine would demand,with the cooperation of the Church with its bishop’s, elders & teachers.

All of which were appointed by him. Any one, especially the Jews. In order to become
what is called a Christian, he must adhere to Constantine’s Creed -
  • 325 CE—Constantine’s Creed
“I renounce all customs, rites, legalisms,

unleavened breads and sacrifices of lambs of the Hebrews,

and all the other feasts of the Hebrews, sacrifices, prayers, aspirations, purifications, sanctifications, and propitiations, and fasts and new moons,

and Sabbaths, and superstitions, and hymns and chants, and observances and synagogues.

absolutely everything Jewish, every Law, rite and custom

and if afterwards I shall wish to deny and return to Jewish superstition, or shall be found eating with Jews, or feasting with them, or secretly conversing and condemning the

Christian religion instead of openly confuting them and condemning their vain faith, then let the trembling of Cain and the leprosy of Gehazi cleave to me, as well as the legal punishments to which I acknowledge myself liable.

And may I be an anathema in the world to come, and may my soul be set down

with Satan and the devils.”

(Stefano Assemani, Acta Sanctorium Martyrum Orientalium at Occidentalium, Vol. 1, Rome
1748, page 105)

Furthermore, any follower of the “Jewish Messiah” (Yahushua HaMashiach)

**who wished to join this “holy community” was compelled to adopt a different set of rules and customs. **

Subsequently special creeds were drafted, to which the Christian would have to swear such as:

“I accept all customs, rites, legalism, and feasts of the Romans, sacrifices.

Prayers, purifications with water, sanctifications by Pontificus Maxmus (high priests of Rome), propitiations, and feasts, and the New Sabbath “So! dei” (day of the Sun, ), all new chants and observances, and all the
foods and drinks of the Romans.

In other words, I absolutely accept everything Roman,catholic every new law, rite and custom, of Rome, and the New Roman Religion.”

Additionally, in approximately 365 AD, the Council of Laodicea wrote, in one of their canons:

Christians must not judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day.

Rather,
honoring the Lord’s Day. But if any shall be found to be Judaizers,

let them be anathema (against) from Christ”.

Note: Protestants are included as they still observe the holidays and Sabbath of Rome,

as in** “are you going to church this coming Lord’s day”.**
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top