4
4Horsemen
Guest
It seems reasonable to me to conclude there was no “pre-existing stuff from which to make us.” I read that Plato believed our souls existed prior to union with the body. But the inner experience of life is basically through our senses. We are living beings because of the substantial form of the unity of soul (substance) with body (accident). St. Thomas Aquinas notes that in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, the Philosopheer teaches the difference between the definition of substance and accident, that a substance is the essence while an accident is outside the essence. (As usual, I have a hard time expressing what I think I’m trying to say4horsemen:
I think humans are a part of the Creation Event, which means that we are each created. If we are, then there was no pre-existing stuff from which to make us. Science will have a problem if we say that God is using what is already here. Of course, science will have a problem if we say that God creates new matter, given the Laws of thermodynamics. The soul is not merely the form, it is the unification of fundamental matter and form.
Science will have a problem defining how God created the soul which is the principle of animation even for a plant. Science tries to explain the idea of abiogenesis in purely materialistic terms. Also, if God were creating new matter, what effect would entropy have since it always increases as you mentioned concerning the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. The prevailing narrative of how the universe began, according to scientific thought, is that it proceeded from chaos. However, order precedes chaos. The intrinsic order of one atom precedes a combination of atoms. Science asks the question, “What are the chances that life could have evolved from chaos,” which is the wrong question. Order existed from the beginning. God created the laws of science, and we are drawn by our reason to seek our destiny.
Maybe from the beginning, God set things up fundamentally that living creatures should be incorporated with form according to the essence of His created beings. In other words, I mean that the laws were in place from the outset, so “form” automatically, so to speak, comes into being at the same moment the creature came into existence. So I don’t know if God keeps creating a new form for each person, animal and plant, or if He had the principle in place so that a particular form is associated with a particular creature due to the way the ‘quarks’ fall!We are all made of the same stuff, so we are all fundamentally, but not completely, different. If this stuff did not pre-exist each creation-event, where was it? Certainly, Forms were instantly created. I cannot conceive of a stable of Forms. And, Fundamental Matter, ‘quarks?’ I don’t know. What do you think?
Of course we know that God can do anything. But when He operates outside of His own laws of reason and logic, He is performing a miracle. So, as stated, it is difficult to understand that He would be creating new material, at least, in our own universe. However, science keep fine-tuning its theories and making new hypotheses. I don’t have the expertise to answer. I just try to read on the subject as much as time permits (vvery llittlePerhaps matter existed. But, certainly, Form could not. We are the creations of God, just as the macro-universe. The universe was created without the pre-presence of anything existent. Now, if God is still rolling out the universe, then he could be creating matter as part of the roll-out. Any thoughts?
Maybe I’m not expressing correctly what I mean. It’s just like we have a conception of the house we intend to build or any other artifact we intend to create. We “build” it mentally first. We think through a plan. Naturally, we can’t say that God has to think things through when He knows all at every moment, or in His Eternal Now. If I’m understanding your point. . . ?That’s right. The soul is the fusion. It is Form and Primary Matter combined. Yet, it is still hard for me to conceive that God knows in advance of Creation, sequentially. It has to be at the beginning moment of creation. And, we don’t know “when” that is. But, I may be wrong.
I see I’ve taken the thread off-track, so to answer the question whether or not some people are “born damned,” in light of the above, I can only conclude that because free will is essential to our substance, we can only damn ourselves.
Many blessings,
4