R
ratio1
Guest
So does the church think it is a brand new religion?I didn’t think the Catholic church believed
in replacement theology.
So does the church think it is a brand new religion?I didn’t think the Catholic church believed
in replacement theology.
Correct, but a saint is a saint is a saint. One born of God is one born of God. One who is born again is the same in either testament. That the gates of heaven were not opened yet, that the pivotal moment of Calvary had not happened yet, does not change salvation by grace and faith for an OT saint. That we may be more empowered by gifts of the Holy Spirit, or have His indwelling does not make us “greater”.though we may do greater works.Israelites went to Hades or Abraham’s Bosom before Jesus. Jesus did not liberate the ones in Hades.
Then is holiness apart or no respecter of an institution or office (patriarch) ?Holiness is from God, not a lineal Patriarch or Matriarch.
Neither does “replacement theology”.Take this as an example, the Church does not believe a Jewish Rabbi can consecrate bread and wine into the person of Jesus Christ.
Agree. Just that some might say OT were not saints, not regenerated in spirit, even second class citizensA saint can be endowed with greater Holiness and privilege than other Saints. So, I wouldn’t say, “a saint is a saint is a saint”, because I take it to mean that all saints are equal.
What is the “it” you are talking about?7_Sorrows:![]()
So does the church think it is a brand new religion?I didn’t think the Catholic church believed
in replacement theology.
That is why I thought the Catholic Church does not teach replacement theology.You need to learn the we do not discount the Old Testament. In the Old Testament God is preparing everyone for the Incarnation of the Word. We never discount the rich relationship of God and his chosen people in the Old Testament
Catholicism.What is the “it” you are talking about?