A
Autumn-Smoke
Guest
Absolutely. I’m learning more and more about my God from current online Judaic teachers and from Jewish commentaries.Does he still use the Jews for revelation?
Absolutely. I’m learning more and more about my God from current online Judaic teachers and from Jewish commentaries.Does he still use the Jews for revelation?
The age of prophecy is long over, and Catholicism considers revelation closed with the resurrection of Christ.Does he still use the Jews for revelation? If so, its not to the extent he once did.
Private revelation?I’m more referring to modern revelation. New information since the death and resurrection.
The Jews were not chosen to be better than others but they were chosen to accept more difficult responsibilities and tougher punishment if they failed to obey God. And to also set examples of evil conduct and bad behavior to the world. For example they denied Jesus was their Messiah. This is confirmed in the Bible texts.FreeMe:![]()
Many books have been written on this subject. It would be impossible to boil it down to a blog post. Why does God allow evil at all? Especially to innocent persons? I suggest you read The Problem of Evil.The Jews regard themselves as the Chosen People, why their God does not protect Jerusalem that has been destroyed twice by Babel and Rome.
I’m not trying to argue with you, but where does the Bible say that? Not arguing, I just want to know. Thank you.The Church teaches (because this is what the scripture teaches) that the Jewish people will eventually be brought back into the fold and will come to believe in the same Messiah that the Church now believes in.
For they did not believe the Lawgiver: “They had no faith in his promises” (Ps 106:24) or the prophets: “They are a rebellious house” (Ez 2:6) or the Son of God: “If I tell the truth, why do you not believe me?” (Jn 8:46).
- Someone could belittle the Jews’ prerogative by citing their ingratitude, through which they would seem to have set aside the value of God’s message. Hence he says, what if some were unfaithful? Does this show that the Jew has no advantage, especially in the light of 2 Pt (2:21): “It would have been better for them never to have known the way of righteousness than after knowing it to turn back from the holy commandments delivered to them.”
In another way, it can be understood as referring to the faith with which God is faithful in keeping His promises: “He who promised is faithful” (Heb 10:23). This faithfulness would be nullified, if it happened that the Jews had no advantage, just because some have not believed.
- Then when he says Does their faithlessness (v3b) he excludes this objection by showing the unsuitable conclusion it engenders. For if the Jews’ prerogative were taken away on account of the unbelief of some, it would follow that man’s unbelief would nullify God’s faithfulness – which is an unacceptable conclusion.
For someone might claim that even though the Jews were formerly beloved on account of their forefathers, nevertheless the hostility they exert against the gospel prevents them from being saved in the future. But the Apostle asserts that this is false, saying: The gifts and call o God are irrevocable, i.e., without repentance. As if to say: That God gives something to certain ones or call certain ones is without repentance, because God does not change His mind: "The Lord has sworn and will not change his mind” (Ps 110:4)
- Then when he says, For the gifts, he excludes an objection.