P
Polak
Guest
I am not making a statement here, rather asking a question, so don’t shoot the OP.
It does however seem this theory comes up quite often every once in a while, that the younger generation are having to ‘take hits’ for the poor.
In the UK it was Brexit, that the older generation voted for something the majority of the younger generation did not want, and would have to live with.
Now we have this pandemic and some could might again be thinking, that this is generally something that affects the elderly, so the shutting down of the economy is essentially being done to protect them for the most part, but doing so will ruin the lives of many younger people, cause a recession and even potentially cause another ‘great depression’ style of life for years to come.
Would you say that is a justifiable argument, or a very unfair way of looking at it?
It does however seem this theory comes up quite often every once in a while, that the younger generation are having to ‘take hits’ for the poor.
In the UK it was Brexit, that the older generation voted for something the majority of the younger generation did not want, and would have to live with.
Now we have this pandemic and some could might again be thinking, that this is generally something that affects the elderly, so the shutting down of the economy is essentially being done to protect them for the most part, but doing so will ruin the lives of many younger people, cause a recession and even potentially cause another ‘great depression’ style of life for years to come.
Would you say that is a justifiable argument, or a very unfair way of looking at it?
Last edited: