Are there any male virgin-martyrs who died in defense of chastity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AnonymousSinner
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
In his encyclical, Pope Pius XII was trying to talk about the different types of perfect chastity and loosely used the term virginity or consecrated virginity. This encyclical is an example of how writing can be less strict when virginity is not actually required for any vocation on its own, but once the Rite of Consecration of Virgins for women living in the world was promulgated, language does need to be tightened up. But also note that he often switches from celibacy to virginity depending on whom he is talking about. E.g. for priests, he speaks of mainly of the discipline celibacy because it is not assumed they are virgins.

In the paragraph you quoted, the English is not very clear (the Latin of course is the normative language). The Latin makes it very clear that the virgin has virginity and there is consecrated widowhood. Funny that. That is why I said it must be read in a different way than you were reading it, because the Latin is much clearer. Maior est, quam ut dinumerari possit multitudo eorum qui, ab Ecclesiae initiis ad nostra usque tempora, suam castitatem Deo obtulerunt, alii quidem illibatam suam virginitatem conservando, alii vero, coniuge defuncto, perpetuam viduitatem eidem consecrando, alii denique, suorum peccatorum paenitentes, vitam omnino castam eligendo; omnes autem eodem concordi proposito praestantes, nempe in perpetuum a carnis delectationibus propter Deum abstinendi. Quod igitur Sancti Patres de virginitatis gloria et merito praedicarunt, his omnibus invitatio, firmamentum ac robur sit, ut immobiliter in sacrificio oblato perseverent, neu quidquam vel minimum, super Dei altare positi holocausti partem tollant sibique vindicent.
 
The dogma of the Council of Trent speaks of the superiority of celibacy over marriage. Whereas before, marriage was compared to virginity.
As I said, before the Council of Trent, the only chastity that was considered perfect was virginity. But the Council of Trent has enlarged, and said that it is sacred celibacy in general. And it is that Pope Pius XII explains in his encyclical.

And finally Pope Pius XII took care to say that he does not speak of those who are committed to the sacred orders, because perfect chastity can be practiced by anyone, you just have to want it. Perfect chastity is not a charism, but an act of the will that everyone can decide to pose whether it is secular or religious.
 
In reality, the Church in her current pastoral care, hide the excellence of sacred celibacy, may be because it will spoil his campaign of overvaluation of marriage.
There are many people who suffer from celibacy. Jesus promised that he will give spiritual goods a hundredfold more, to those who will give up wife and child for his love. The Council of Trent says it is happier to remain single for God, than to marry.
Instead of the Church encouraging all those who suffer their celibacy to make their celibacy sacred, it is silent! it does not show them the great spiritual greatness of sacred celibacy, and the great spiritual happiness we will have in sacred celibacy, it no longer tells them that Jesus promised a hundredfold happiness to those who give up women and children for his love, while he promised no special happiness to those who get married!
 
Last edited:
That is factually incorrect. The Church has always considered perfect chastity to include but not be limited to virginity.
 
I speak of theologians in general, look, for example, how St. Thomas Aquinas spoke of Chastity, He spoke of virginity as perfect chastity, then of common chastity.
And many theologians take up this categorization of chastity, namely virginity and common chastity.
But Sacras virginitas, and the Council of Trent, speak of Sacred Celibacy, and common chastity.
 
Onthisrock84 said:
How do we know anyone is a virgin? I often wonder that. Like some saints will say virgin , how do we know?
Click to expand...
that’s an interesting question. Indeed, there is no visible external sign that proves that one stayed virgin. Yet he may have some visible external signs that prove one has lived in sacred celibacy.
 
At this point I will bow out of the conversation. I don’t believe any reputable scholar would adopt your viewpoint as it is not the tradition of the Church nor are you making necessary distinctions and definitions.
 
But I have mentioned Saint Thomas Aquinas! prove to me that he does not speak of chastity as I present it (Perhaps he has spoken of perfect chastity in another work, but in the theological sum, unless some details have escaped me, he divides chastity into virginity, and into common chastity).
I speak with references. Show me at least why my references are false.
I could quote other theologians, but they are “common” theologians who do just the synthesis of renowned theologians
 
Last edited:
Indeed, St. Thomas does speak of what we now call “perfect chastity” in another part of the Summa. But perhaps what may have thrown you off is the terminology he employed. It is under the section on continence. Thus it is a mistake to just read what he wrote on virginity and assume that he does not cover chastity. Or mistakenly hold that he thought that chastity is identical to virginity. Of course, one ought to be familiar with scholastic philosophy/theology to understand his treatment of continence which I happen to be, and this article here can help point to why a straight reading of Aquinas may lead to strange conclusions when the vocabulary and definitions are not understood. https://thomasfortoday.blogspot.com/2010/10/st-thomas-aquinas-on-continence.html
Sacra virginitas, the Summa, and other documents ought to be read with care and with an understanding of the different senses used in the terminology employed. Someone just reading them off the street or who did not understand the scholastic methodology would not have this understanding since it is specialized.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top