Are there any venial sins against 6th/9th Commandments?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DL82
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

DL82

Guest
I have heard it said before that there are no venial sins when it comes to the 6th and 9th commandments, adultery and coveting your neighbour’s wife, but that all sins against these commandments are mortal.

This Examination of Conscience catholicparents.org/oxcart/Examination%20of%20Conscience.pdf lists some venial sins against them.

This is particularly important, because 4 sins listed as venial under the 9th commandment are active problems that I struggle with.

Is this examination erroneous in some way?

Can something be subjectively grave matter even if objectively it’s not, i.e. if something is ‘a big thing’ in someone’s life, or they believe it to be mortal sin but do it anyway, does it have the same effect as if it really was a mortal sin?
 
I have heard it said before that there are no venial sins when it comes to the 6th and 9th commandments, adultery and coveting your neighbour’s wife, but that all sins against these commandments are mortal.

This Examination of Conscience catholicparents.org/oxcart/Examination%20of%20Conscience.pdf lists some venial sins against them.

This is particularly important, because 4 sins listed as venial under the 9th commandment are active problems that I struggle with.

Is this examination erroneous in some way?

Can something be subjectively grave matter even if objectively it’s not, i.e. if something is ‘a big thing’ in someone’s life, or they believe it to be mortal sin but do it anyway, does it have the same effect as if it really was a mortal sin?
Your question really involves the clarification of what constitutes a mortal sin. Objectively grave matter is one of the three criterion for an act to become mortally sinful. So, all intrinsically grave actions definitely have the potential for one being in mortal sin but if the person does not have the knowledge that the act is grave in nature AND/OR does not fully consent to the act (sometimes force of habit may reduce culpability) then the sin remains venial.

So, to answer your question, you must have the full understanding of the Church’s teaching on two separate issues regarding sin. 1) What actions constitute grave, intrinsically disordered rebellion against God and 2) How do we understand our assent of the will while committing these actions…teachccd
 
Can something be subjectively grave matter even if objectively it’s not, i.e. if something is ‘a big thing’ in someone’s life, or they believe it to be mortal sin but do it anyway, does it have the same effect as if it really was a mortal sin?
No. I can believe all day that tapping my foot is a mortal sin but it cannot be since that is not a disordered action against God. BUT if while I am tapping my foot I am thinking, “God I hope that this annoys you so much because I really wish to separate myself from you”, then you move into another area whereby the foot tapping makes no difference. This sin is your attitude towards God and would manifest itself in other ways eventually.

There is no cut and dry answer to this question and that is why it is best to find a spiritual director or see your confessor regularly. He (or she if a spiritual director) can understand your struggles to the extent that they are and guide you to holiness. I hope that this helps…teachccd
 
I’ve never heard that all sins against the 6th and 9th commandments are mortal. The venial sins under the 6th and 9th commandments on that list don’t seem to be grave matter. I would consider them all to be venial. But if you are in doubt, you can always ask your priest in the confessional if those sins or mortal or venial. That’s what I do anyway.

As far as something being a mortal sin if you think it is a mortal sin…I’ve read that this is true. I think it was in the Baltimore Catechism, but I don’t remember. But anyway, I read that even if something is not usually a mortal sin, it can be a mortal sin for you if you think it is mortal. This is because you think you know it is mortal and yet you still fully consent to doing it anyway. You are fully willing to commit a mortal sin which you know would separate you from God. I guess that would mean the thought behind the action was the mortal sin rather than the action itself though. I don’t know. 🤷
 
As far as something being a mortal sin if you think it is a mortal sin…I’ve read that this is true. I think it was in the Baltimore Catechism, but I don’t remember. But anyway, I read that even if something is not usually a mortal sin, it can be a mortal sin for you if you think it is mortal. This is because you think you know it is mortal and yet you still fully consent to doing it anyway. You are fully willing to commit a mortal sin which you know would separate you from God. I guess that would mean the thought behind the action was the mortal sin rather than the action itself though. I don’t know. 🤷
Both this answer and TeachCCD’s answers seem to imply that in order to commit a mortal sin, you must WANT to alienate God. That seems a rather strong formulation.

The three conditions for mortal sin are:
a) Grave matter
b) Knowledge that the matter is a sin - not knowledge that it is a mortal sin.
c) Consent of the will - this means consenting to the grave sin (a), not consenting to anger God. It just means not being asleep or under duress in some way. You don’t have to WANT the action to be sinful, you just need to know it is sinful and choose to do it anyway.

So, in that situation, if I have committed these acts, believing them to be mortal sins, can I breathe a sigh of relief knowing now that they are only venial, or are they the same as mortal sins because I committed them in the (presumed) knowledge that they were.

It was a priest I saw for my first confession, an Opus Dei priest who is very well versed in Church doctrine, who said that all sins against the 6th and 9th commandment were grave matter, so I should confess them all. Admittedly, in context, in my first confession I was confessing much graver sins than these, so maybe he just meant all of the sins of the type I was confessing against the 6th and 9th commandments were grave matter. I’m confused.
 
Full Consent can be influenced negatively by anxiety, social pressures, ingrained habit, etc…this can diminish this aspect of mortal sin.

I think too many here have the ‘you choose to do it anyway’ = full consent attitude. I think this is incorrect if you look at the Church’s teaching on mortal sin. I may give very reluctant consent out of weakness or out of control hormones, but this is not the same thing as full consent. Full consent would be me embracing a grave sin in full and declaring it not grave and making no effort to resist such sins despite studying Church teaching on the subject…A struggling sinner is given some leeway in the full consent department on the presumption of the good will of the sinner to stop sinful behavior.
 
Both this answer and TeachCCD’s answers seem to imply that in order to commit a mortal sin, you must WANT to alienate God. That seems a rather strong formulation.

The three conditions for mortal sin are:
a) Grave matter
b) Knowledge that the matter is a sin - not knowledge that it is a mortal sin.
c) Consent of the will - this means consenting to the grave sin (a), not consenting to anger God. It just means not being asleep or under duress in some way. You don’t have to WANT the action to be sinful, you just need to know it is sinful and choose to do it anyway.

So, in that situation, if I have committed these acts, believing them to be mortal sins, can I breathe a sigh of relief knowing now that they are only venial, or are they the same as mortal sins because I committed them in the (presumed) knowledge that they were.

It was a priest I saw for my first confession, an Opus Dei priest who is very well versed in Church doctrine, who said that all sins against the 6th and 9th commandment were grave matter, so I should confess them all. Admittedly, in context, in my first confession I was confessing much graver sins than these, so maybe he just meant all of the sins of the type I was confessing against the 6th and 9th commandments were grave matter. I’m confused.
I don’t really think you have to WANT to alienate God…not very many people want that I would guess. I was just saying that if you think it is a mortal sin and you fully consent to it, it is a mortal sin. At least according to what I’ve read. I was thinking that maybe it wasn’t always the action itself that makes something a mortal sin. Like maybe if you thought something like…looking at your reflection was a mortal sin. The action itself isn’t a mortal sin, but it’s thinking it is that makes it one if you fully consent to doing it.

This is what my copy of the Baltimore Catechism says about this (in case you want to see what I’m referring to for yourself and make your own conclusion):

What three things are necessary to make a sin mortal?
To make a sin mortal these three things are necessary: first, the thought, desire, word, action, or omission must be seriously wrong or considered seriously wrong; second, the sinner must be mindful of the serious wrong; third, the sinner must fully consent to it.
(a) Things seriously evil are known to be such from Sacred Scripture, Tradition, the teachings of the Church, or from the nature of the acts themselves.
(b) The sinner is mindful of the serious wrong if at the time he commits the sin or places a cause from which he foresees the sin will follow, he either is clearly aware or at least thinks that the action is grievously sinful.
(c) A sinner fully consents to the wrong when he freely chooses to do evil, although he is entirely free not to do it. A person who deliberately consents to do something grievously sinful is guilty of mortal sin although he never actually does it, because his will has chosen evil in preference to good.

Some of the stuff in this Catechism could be pretty old since it says it’s the “official revised edition 1949”, but it was printed in 2001. So I’m not sure if this is what the Church still teaches on the subject…but I’m just sharing the information I have cause maybe it can help.
 
The three conditions for mortal sin are:
a) Grave matter
b) Knowledge that the matter is a sin - not knowledge that it is a mortal sin.
c) Consent of the will - this means consenting to the grave sin (a), not consenting to anger God. It just means not being asleep or under duress in some way. You don’t have to WANT the action to be sinful, you just need to know it is sinful and choose to do it anyway.
Can you back up your added conclusions with official Church documents?? The text highlighted is ambiguous…teachccd 🤷
 
I don’t really think you have to WANT to alienate God…not very many people want that I would guess. I was just saying that if you think it is a mortal sin and you fully consent to it, it is a mortal sin. At least according to what I’ve read. I was thinking that maybe it wasn’t always the action itself that makes something a mortal sin. Like maybe if you thought something like…looking at your reflection was a mortal sin. The action itself isn’t a mortal sin, but it’s thinking it is that makes it one if you fully consent to doing it.

This is what my copy of the Baltimore Catechism says about this (in case you want to see what I’m referring to for yourself and make your own conclusion):

What three things are necessary to make a sin mortal?
To make a sin mortal these three things are necessary: first, the thought, desire, word, action, or omission must be seriously wrong or considered seriously wrong; second, the sinner must be mindful of the serious wrong; third, the sinner must fully consent to it.
(a) Things seriously evil are known to be such from Sacred Scripture, Tradition, the teachings of the Church, or from the nature of the acts themselves.
(b) The sinner is mindful of the serious wrong if at the time he commits the sin or places a cause from which he foresees the sin will follow, he either is clearly aware or at least thinks that the action is grievously sinful.
(c) A sinner fully consents to the wrong when he freely chooses to do evil, although he is entirely free not to do it. A person who deliberately consents to do something grievously sinful is guilty of mortal sin although he never actually does it, because his will has chosen evil in preference to good.

Some of the stuff in this Catechism could be pretty old since it says it’s the “official revised edition 1949”, but it was printed in 2001. So I’m not sure if this is what the Church still teaches on the subject…but I’m just sharing the information I have cause maybe it can help.
Your information is correct. However it still leaves me with the question: If one knows that he is committing a grave sin and fully consents to the action then isn’t he “wanting” to alienate himself from God? The full consent is the part whereby the choice is made to replace God with an infinitely lesser pleasure that is gravely offensive to God. And you are correct that not many people would “want” to alienate themselves from God, but when they sin mortally this is EXACTLY what they chose to do…teachccd 🙂
 
So, let’s say I’m guilty of lack of custody of the eyes, or of seeking out images that, though not pornographic, are likely to encourage the wrong thoughts. If I know that I’ll probably find these images on TV, and I turn on the TV, and I know that what I’m doing is a sin, does the consent and the awareness and the lack of awareness that it’s not mortal sin (until I saw the list in the 1st post, I thought all such sins were mortal) mean that I’ve committed a mortal sin?

What about if I’m walking down the street, I know if I look at the women I pass I will probably objectify or lust after them (though I’m slowly getting better at not doing this), should I look down at the paving stones instead of up at people, even though by doing so I make myself look strange and miss seeing the rest of God’s creation?

Before anyone asks, no, I’m not scrupulous, I just want to be free from all attachment to sin, even venial sin. The Church says that it’s possible by God’s grace, and I won’t rest until that’s a reality in my life, because only then can I really begin to do good.
 
I am really scrupulous, though. This bothers me because some examinations say that certain actions are grave for the sixth/ninth commandments, while others are venial.
There are different sites that specifically say LIST OF MORTAL AND VENIAL SINS.

But there is an examination of conscience in the back of the Daily Roman Missal that says that begins with:

Ask yourself if you HAD FULL KNOWLEDGE AND FULL CONSENT TO THE FOLLOWING:

The thing that I am worried about is listening to music with curse words or sexual content. I am a musician and I enjoy listening toa vareity of rock music: Pink Floyd, Beatles, Weezer, Green Day, Band of Horses, etc.

Now Jim Akin wrote specifically about listening to bad music. From what I heard from any source but the back of the Daily Roman Missal by Jim Socias, that telling bad jokes, listening to bad music, etc are occasions of sin; and an occasion of sin would be something that would put yourself in danger of committing sin depending on your own weakness.

I am scrupulous about listening to certain tracks by Green Day, especially “Longview”…It doesn’t cause me to committ a mortal sin, but can this fall in the category of grave matter?

I am guessing by this thread you are using Father Altier’s examination of conscience.

It seems to come down to which examination of conscience best fits the teachings of the church.
 
Buddy,stop worrying about baseless scruples,or other peoples opinions or Jansenism-----FORM YOUR CONSCIENCE.You have the right to act according to conscience & freedom,not being coerced or bullied by no one,even the pope. Yes conscience must be well formed,the education of conscience is a life long task.Jesus said that you love God & love your neighbour,thats the basis of morality.St Paul teaches that love wishes to do no harm to neighbour.Even the catechism says when we die we will be judged by our ability to love.God is not this highly legalistic,strike you down God because you struggle or fail at times.He is there for you.Before Vatican II anything to do with sexuality was serious because the people making the rules were celibate & had a fear of sexuality or a unhealthy attitude towards it.Since Vatican II that talk has died
 
Buddy,stop worrying about baseless scruples,or other peoples opinions or Jansenism-----FORM YOUR CONSCIENCE.You have the right to act according to conscience & freedom,not being coerced or bullied by no one,even the pope. Yes conscience must be well formed,the education of conscience is a life long task.Jesus said that you love God & love your neighbour,thats the basis of morality.St Paul teaches that love wishes to do no harm to neighbour.Even the catechism says when we die we will be judged by our ability to love.God is not this highly legalistic,strike you down God because you struggle or fail at times.He is there for you.Before Vatican II anything to do with sexuality was serious because the people making the rules were celibate & had a fear of sexuality or a unhealthy attitude towards it.Since Vatican II that talk has died
Please refrain from such.
 
Is fornication, masturbation, adultery, pornography, looking in order to lust after some person one sees, lustful thoughts, homosexual acts, prostitution etc …all grave matter for mortal sin (or objectively mortal sin)? Yes.

Now could there be “venial sin” in such? Yes-- if there is lack of the needed knowledge or complete consent.

A good source is the Catechism of the Catholic Church -which is a fruit of Vatican II
 
Is slavery being morally licit valid ?(Pope Pius IX),Is Sex in marriage a necessary evil tainted with sin ?(pope gregory the great,Innocent II,Sixtus),Usury under any circumstance evi ?l(Councils Nicae,Vienne,Lyon,Lateran) Today the Vatican Bank practices usury. Is masturbation to provide semen to check for cancer sin ? as opposed to masturbation to pornography. Is lying to the Nazis where Jews are hidden in order to protect them from certain death different from lying under perjury where a innocent man gets condemned ?
How about killing in self defense as opposed to killing in homicide ? Vatican II yanked conscience upfront & used the words …Loyalty to Conscience because conscience is placed above persons who are more interested in ideology than sound theology or who have no experience in what their talking about
 
Kalbertone there is a good bit of misunderstanding or incorrect information in the two posts above (for example --yes it is sinful to masturbate in order to obtain a sperm sample --yes it is in fact sinful…) But most would take us too far afield. My suggestion would be to give a call to the apologists line – they can take you through each one by one and give each the needed time.
 
No it would not be sinful,my life,my health & my conscience dictate otherwise.Like a soldier killing a enemy soldier in a just war,perfectly licit.With your logic Jesus sinned when he healed on the sabbath as the pharisees claimed.A good conscience discerns & distinguishes & does not get caught up in blind legalism.Hence applying the spirit of the law as well as the letter
 
No it would not be sinful,my life,my health & my conscience dictate otherwise.Like a soldier killing a enemy soldier in a just war,perfectly licit.With your logic Jesus sinned when he healed on the sabbath as the pharisees claimed.A good conscience discerns & distinguishes & does not get caught up in blind legalism.Hence applying the spirit of the law as well as the letter
Some mixing apples with oranges here.

Yes there can be “just war” but such is a different matter then what is being discussed.

An the “spirit of the law” argument and the “pharisee” argument does not apply in this manner.

And I would note that it is not “blind legalism”. We are to form our conscience according to the Teachings of the Church and orthodox moral theology and correct our conscience when it judges in error.

The ends do not justify the means.

Catechism of the Catholic Church

Quote:

“One must …work to correct the errors of moral conscience” (CCC 1793)

1759 “An evil action cannot be justified by reference to a good intention” (cf. St. Thomas Aquinas, Dec. praec. 6). The end does not justify the means.

2039 …Personal conscience and reason should not be set in opposition to the moral law or the Magisterium of the Church.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top