mshealy:
I have often heard Catholic apologists and theologians speak of “tradition” with a big “T” and “tradition” with a little “t”. The former is often designated as “dogma” or the “deposit of the faith” while the later is often referred to as “discipline” or “significant teaching” but it is not necessary to hold to the later to be a good Catholic, though holding to the former is. How does one tell the difference? Is there a clear test or list.
Written Tradition is the Catholic Scriptures. Unwritten, beyond those Scriptures would for example, be “what books are required to be in the Catholic Scriptures”. One must necessarily go Outside written Tradition to determine what is IN written Tradition.
The Catechism is a primary listing of "T"radition including Gospels, Epistles, and by Word of mouth all handed down. If some point is only "t"radition, it will normally indicate it.
Canon Law is primarily "t"radition. If some point is "T"radition, it will normally indicate it.
Each is a set of beliefs and discipline garnered over 2000 years of practice, wisdom, and the Deposit of Faith.
2 Thessalonians 2:14 Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether
by word, or by our epistle.
Of course, if one is NOT a brethern of St Paul, one may ignore this command.
One may then start a new religion based on say, written Tradition only and one’s own interpretation and declare that they have the Holy Ghost on their shoulder…a tempting idea. Until of couse, someone thought he had a bummer interpretation and then they could start the same process themselves. Then the Messiah’s prayer could be interpretated “that they all may be many”.
Not that the would ever happen!