A
antroji
Guest
Thanks. While I appreciate the need for tenet and dogma, my tendency is to go with the mystics and the more direct route. In whatever stream of spiritual considerations I look, it is rather inevitably the directness of the mystic that speaks with an authority stronger by several orders of magnitude than the homilies from the pulpit. And this is why, as well, that the grace of a competent spiritual guide who is accomplished in perception as distinct from book learning is absolutely invaluable.Antroji – wow, what an incredible posting! It’s more lyrical and more insightful than most priestly homilies I’ve heard this year. Thanks much!
StAnastasia
As Jane Jacobs asserted in her work, it is not encyclopedic documentation of facts and processes that preserve and transmit civilization. It is acquiring the feel of something under the tutelage of a competent practitioner that accomplishes that. Remember, it takes at least 10,000 hours of practice for any person to reach an actual independent facility in any art or process, even if useful fruit results near the beginning. My Mentor could, because of his astonishing ability in Music, discern volumes of information about a person from a single sentence they uttered. We are, generally, very superficial in our perceptions and thoughts. Especially in our thinking about thoughts.
It is this lack of exercise of the self-reflexive aspect of awareness that keeps us in such states as RC is battling with, even if ours appear less noxious because more people share our limitations. But in any case, it is the feel of penetrating the intellectual assertions of religiosity that starts to yield some ability to be lyrical as distinct from dogmatic. I like to hear or sing the Song rather than read about the technicalities of where the notes go.