M
MariaG
Guest
Well, nothing like painting all with the same brushYes. You are all way too brittle and angry to the Protestants. I would never in a million years send a Protestant friend here to be evangelized.
Well, nothing like painting all with the same brushYes. You are all way too brittle and angry to the Protestants. I would never in a million years send a Protestant friend here to be evangelized.
Doreen, B’luved. You came to the Forums with REAL questions, real situations, real experiences. And you were honest and in serious dialogue. So people treated you with the respect you earned by your respectful demeanor.I have been having wonderful discussions on this site with various people of various backgrounds, and I feel MOST Catholics on this site have been willing to listen and accept what I say with grace, and they’ve given me much of their time in trying to help me understand the Catholic teachings…
This has done two things for me:
ONE: given me the ability to admire my Catholic brothers and sisters.
TWO: Allowed me to clear up some serious misunderstandings i have had about the RCC.
I think that we do a terrible disservice to the intent and purpose of a website like this if we cannot discuss topics with respect for others, and though we do not have to agree, one should offer their thoughts without judgement, and with grace.
After all, those who have searched out a site like this, probably have questions…and you won’t persuade anyone to hear you with harsh words and immediate rejection.
2 Timothy 2:24 “And a servant of the Lord must not quarrel but be gentle to all, able to teach, patient,”
(There goes another silly protestant taking bits of the Bible and applying it where they may!!!)
D.
What would you expect a true believer to ‘SLING’ at you - verses from Snapple caps !!?Doreen, B’luved. You came to the Forums with REAL questions, real situations, real experiences. And you were honest and in serious dialogue. So people treated you with the respect you earned by your respectful demeanor.
I think this thread got started because Malachi4U (USMC, former Baptist) had got fed up with the kind of anti-Catholic terrorist who verse-slings and smears without ever really hearing the Catholic point of view.
A couple of real pips (Catholic and Protestant) have posted on this thread.
My advice to you is to depart from this thread pronto! It’s a dead end for someone like you with serious questions and bigger issues.
My friend, I don’t need strength to stick around. What I would need is more false teachings.My friend, if you have the fortitude to stick around, and the Humility to learn a lesson, I have complete confidence that the brilliant apologists on this site will help you see the error or your ways…
However, you might want to start a new thread that says something to the effect: “Tell me why I’m **Not ** once save, always saved!”
What is it that you mean by this?My friend, I don’t need strength to stick around. What I would need is more false teachings.
It’s not a matter of doctrines of men in Catholic teaching Tom, it’s the complete other way around, but your preachers and pastors either don’t know about these things (because no one showed them) or else they don’t have the guts and the spiritual and intellectual integrity to obey the Word of God when it says, “15 Carefully study to present thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth.” (2nd Timothy 2:15)You see, if we (you or anyone else) feel the need to confront Scripture with the doctrine of man or tradition, then the only thing I will need is my Bible.
But the problem for you is what you mean by your final authority being the Word of God is actually your final authority is your personal interpretation of what you think any given passage of the word of God means. You think this is the pillar of truth, but even here the Word of God does not agree with you because it says “15 But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.” (1st Timothy 3:15. Emphasis mine) But then all your teachers and preachers didn’t tell you that, did they? No they didn’t. And when you read the New Testament for yourself you sort of read over that verse and ignore it because there is no way to understand it in the context of the teaching that you have embraced. If you accept it as truth from the Word of God, then it means that the whole house of cards of Sola Scriptura begins to crumble and it means that the basis for truth is the church and what the church confirms that a passage means, not what some preacher, or even you or me thinks it means.If your FINAL authority is anything but the Word of God, then there is no need for discussion.
Would you please explain to me what you meant by being “saved” from an Evangelical perspective.What is it that you mean by this?
So far as I can tell you’re the only one here that is espousing the teachings of men as the Word of God. All because you have been told BY MEN that that is what they mean. But of course they don’t tell you the whole story, because if they did then you’d still be Catholic. All they tell you is the teachings of men that came into being in the “reformation” and have spun off out of control for the last 500 years. But if you go back to the writings of the 1st and 2nd century church you find out real quick that the guys that the apostles discipled didn’t believe the interpretations that you do. It’s not a matter of doctrines of men in Catholic teaching Tom, it’s the complete other way around, but your preachers and pastors either don’t know about these things (because no one showed them) or else they don’t have the guts and the spiritual and intellectual integrity to obey the Word of God when it says, “15 Carefully study to present thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth.” (2nd Timothy 2:15)
Read my story HERE.
But the problem for you is what you mean by your final authority being the Word of God is actually your final authority is your personal interpretation of what you think any given passage of the word of God means. You think this is the pillar of truth, but even here the Word of God does not agree with you because it says “15 But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.” (1st Timothy 3:15. Emphasis mine) But then all your teachers and preachers didn’t tell you that, did they? No they didn’t. And when you read the New Testament for yourself you sort of read over that verse and ignore it because there is no way to understand it in the context of the teaching that you have embraced. If you accept it as truth from the Word of God, then it means that the whole house of cards of Sola Scriptura begins to crumble and it means that the basis for truth is the church and what the church confirms that a passage means, not what some preacher, or even you or me thinks it means.
Worse still is the situation that precipitates from there, as one begins to look at passages like John 6:30-70, all the Last Supper passages, and 1st Corinthians 10:16-17 & 11:23-30 and when you compare them to the writings of Ignatius of Antioch who was the close friend and disciple of St. John as well as the bishop of that church (LINKED HERE) you see that what you have accepted about those passages does not match.
Suddenly, (if one is honest) one begins to look and notice that most of the teachings of non-Catholic churches do not match what the early church left us in their writings. So if the disciples of the apostle John disagree with what you have been taught that the Word of God means, who is likely to be in error? You and the teachers that you have listened to, or the church that Jesus founded on His chief apostle Kephas and that holds the same teachings today as they did then?
You have been taught that the Catholic Church does not believe the Bible and a bunch of other bunkum, but the FACT is that the Catholic Church believes the BIble and is smart enough to check any interpretations of it against the writings of those who were there with the apostles…and then the men that those bishops and disciple taught. In this way one can be assured that the interpretations of the Word of God are faithful to what comes to us from Christ Himself through his apostles.
You and all those “ex”-Catholics like you need to wake up and really see what is happening to you. I sure did! You have been and are consistently being taught erroneous doctrines of men.
Pax tecum,
I’m going to assume that you are speaking to me concerning the following part of my testimony on the linked forum.Would you please explain to me what you meant by being “saved” from an Evangelical perspective.
I would like to offer you my own personal testimony so you can see where I’m comin’ from and WHY I returned to Catholicism.
If so, then this means that I prayed a “sinner’s prayer” and asked Christ to take over my life.I am a cradle Catholic and a “revert” to the faith after being gone for about 34 years. I had left the Church at about age 17 because I was on drugs and then “got saved” at a Campus Life Bible study that was run by a very cool minister. I had always gone to church but never really taken it seriously or read the Bible, even though it was in the house and other members of my family read it. The lack was not in the church (I see that now) but within me. I began to read the Bible for the first time in my life…(the epistle of St. James) and it really hit home. I have always believed in God, but I saw that that was not enough. I did alright for a couple of years, got married and we moved here to Florida, where I stayed out of establishment churches because I figured they were all messed up and did my thing as a “Jesus freak”, witnessing on the streets and handing out Christian underground papers and tracts, and “witnessing” to anyone who would listen.
Malachi,Yea, I learned all these as a Protestant.
This statement disturbed me.You’d say, “No, not the WHOLE, fullness of the truth can be found outside the RCC.” I say, "No, the fullness of the truth is not in the RCC doctrine, because so much has been “added” to Christ’s sacrifice…the doctrine has been enmeshed with “tradition” which has taken the emphasis away from the truth of Christ’s sacrifice for us.
I like the analogy and the point made. You can’t overgeneralize as to the 22,000 denominations of Protestantism. I am, technically, a Protestant because I am part of the Anglican Communion which, technically, protested Romish claims as to Papal Supremacy and Infallibility when speaking ex catedra, though I am fairly well versed in the CCC and Catholic apologetics because I feel the Lord has called me to further explore that which I used to not understand but routinely and blithely criticize as the de facto “largest Protestant Church of the sixteenth century”. I now understand Catholicism more and more and consider myself more of a Catholic Christian who finds himself in a different tradition that claims to be part of the Catholic tree than as a Bible-only Protestant. To some Catholics, however (and regardless of how much I may agree with them theologically), I am still a Protestant and part of the “separated brethren”. I offer this as a means of buttressing what Steadfast indicated because it is a key point–only the most reactionary and fundamentalist of Protestant Christians should be offended (if that is the right word) by Catholic claims as to it being the “one, true, holy, catholic and apostolic church”. I am not; I only search for common ground between our communions and wrestle, as I see it, with whether the Anglican Communion would have to be completely subsumed within the worldwide Catholic Communion or could hold on to its traditions, liturgy and Book of Common Prayer, with slight revisions, naturally. Everything else (which is set forth in the historic Creeds) is common ground as I see it. Shalom everyone!Well, it’s the nature of the beast.
Here is a forum on a website devoted to Catholic Apologetics populated by Catholics who listen to Catholic Answers, have read a lot of books on the subject of apologetics from a Catholic perspective and are all too eager to make their cases.
Having said that, I see two problems:
When you set about learning how to repair diesel engines, you first learn everything you can about fixing them, you learn how they work, about their componentry, etc. And once you’ve learned how to fix Cummins engines you don’t assume that you can fix a Perkins as well.
- Piling On. You would do well to allow your gentler apologists to do the heavy lifting. When you see that a Protestant’s objections are being effectively answered, discretion might be the better part of valor (it is certainly always the better part of charity).
- Learn to differentiate between Fundamentalists and Protestants. The arguments against the former will not fit the latter even though the latter sometimes sound like the former. It’s a terrifically nuanced business, here’s an analogy:
![]()
Thanks for the link. Their article about the eucharist was awesome.I think that, for the most part, the Protestants who come here are treated with love, respect, and tolerance. Generally, they are not told they are heretics and are going to hell (I acknowledge some go too far, but I think most will agree with me that this is not the norm).
However, we do not always get the same treatment in return, as in Contender Ministries, who claim we are a cult;
“If we shied away from addressing the doctrines of Catholicism, simply because we may not be popular for doing so, we would be failing to carry out the Great Commission.”
contenderministries.org/catholicism.php
Check it out for yourselves. For a while they were posting Catholic responses to their claims, but have not done so for nearly a year. Maybe they think the matter is closed.
In my “travels” as an aspiring apologist, I have been thrown out of churches that I had been invited to visit when it was revealed to the pastor I was Catholic, been told that Catholics were going to hell, that nothing good EVER came out of the Church, and been called a heretic. I have even been verbally atacked on my beliefs by persons I considered close friends. I love my protestant brethren, they have taught me many worthwhile things, but sadly, I have found that there is an intolerant streak about them at times.
Check out these scriptures:
Church
Mt 16:18-19 ~ upon this rock I will build my Church
Mt 18:17-18 ~ if he refuses to listen even to the Church
Mt 28:18-20 ~ go baptize and teach all nations
Mk 16:16 ~ go to whole world proclaim gospel
Lk 10:16 ~ who listens to you, listens to me
Jn 14:16-26 ~ HS w/ you always, teach/remind everything
Jn 16:12 ~ Spirit of truth will guide you to all truth
1Tim 3:15 ~ Church is the pillar & foundation of truth
Church is Body of Christ
Col 1:18 ~ he is head of the body, the Church
1Cor 12:20-27 ~ you are Christ’s body, individual parts of it
Eph 5:30 ~ we are members of his body
Rom 12:4-5 ~ though many, we are one body in Christ
1Cor 6:15 ~ not know your bodies are members of Christ?
Church must be One
Jn 10:16 ~ there shall be one fold and one shepherd
Eph 4:3-6 ~ one Lord, one faith, one baptism, One God
Rom 16:17 ~ avoid those who create dissensions
1Cor1:10 ~ I urge that there be no divisions among you
Phil 2:2 ~ be same mind, united in heart, thinking one thing
Rom 5:15 ~ God grant you to think in harmony w/one another
Jn 17:17-23 ~ I pray they may be one, as we are one
Jn 17:23 ~ they be brought to perfection as one
1Cor12:13 ~ in one spirit baptized in one body
Rom 12:5 ~ tho many, one body in Christ
Eph 4:4 ~ one body one Spirit, called to hope
Col 3:15 ~ you were called in one body
Church is Apostolic
Jn 15:16 ~ chose special men
Jn 20:21 ~ gave them his own mission
Lk 22:30 ~ gave them a kingdom
Mt 16:18 ~ built Church upon Peter
Jn 10:16 ~ appointed one shepherd
Lk 22:32 ~ shepherd is Peter
Jn 21:17 ~ shepherd is Peter
Eph 4:11 ~ Hierchical leadership
1Tim 3:18; 5:17 ~ bishops, priests & deacons
Tit 1:5 ~ bishops to ordain priests
Church is Authoritative
Mt 28:18-20 ~ all power given to Apostles
Jn 20:23 ~ given power to forgive sins
1Cor 11:24 ~ power to confect Eucharist
Lk 10:16 ~ power to speak w/Christ’s voice
Mt 18:18 ~ power to legislate
Mt 18:17 ~ power to discipline
Church is Infallible
Jn 16:13 ~ guided by HS in all truth
Jn 14:26 ~ HS teach/remind everything
Lk 10:16 ~ speak with Christ’s voice
1Tm 3:15 ~ Church pillar & foundation of truth
IJn 2:27 ~ annointing of HS remains in you
Act 15:28 ~ Apostles speak with voice of HS
Mt 28:20 ~ I am with you always
Church is Perpetual
Is 9:6-7 ~ of his gov’t there will be no end
Dan 2:44 ~ God’s kingdom stands forever
Dan 7:14 ~ his kingdom shall not be destroyed
Lk 1:32-33 ~ no end to Christ’s kingdom
Mt 7:24 ~ like wise man built house on rock
Mt 13:24-30
Mt 16:18 ~ gates of Hell will never prevail
Jn 14:16 ~ HS with you always
Mt 28:19-20 ~ I am with you all days
Apostolic Succession
2Chr 19:11 ~ hi priest over you in everything
Mal 2:7 ~ seek instruction from priests…
Eph 2:20 ~ built upon foundation of apostles
Eph 4:11 ~ Hiearchical leadership
1Cor 12:28-29 ~ God designated in church…
Acts 1:20 ~ let another take his office
Acts 1: 25-26 ~ Matthias selected
1Tim 3:18; 5:17 ~ bishops, priests & deacons
1Tim 4:14 ~ gift conferred by laying on hands
1Tim 5:22 ~ do not lay on hands too readily
Acts 14:23 ~ presbyters appointed
2Tim 2:2 ~ what heard from me entrust others
Tit 1:5 ~ appoint presbyters in every town
Alfie, The article that you think was awesome contained this quote:Thanks for the link. Their article about the eucharist was awesome.
Really? What is your authority for your interpretation? What do you do with these scriptures?Thanks for the link. Their article about the eucharist was awesome.