L
Link0126
Guest
Listening to Father Barron’s sermon from a couple weeks ago on the “gates of hell”: wordonfire.org/WOF-Radio/Sermons/Sermon-Archive-for-2011/Sermon-554-The-Gates-of-Hell-21st-Week-of.aspx
In the last couple minutes he mentions his interpretation is not that of an infallible promise to the Church against the offensive nature of Satan but rather a call to action for the Church against worldly injustice and sin.
Then of course there is Francis Turretin’s blog on the verse in which he, in typical protestant fashion, applies complete spiritualism and says it is about the resurrection of all believers: turretinfan.blogspot.com/2009/04/gates-of-hell-shall-not-prevail-against.html
Both Barron and Turretin, in their critique of the traditional stance provide the compelling reason that gates are not an offensive weapon but are only used defensively in warfare and so how can it be that the Church is being guarded against “the gates of hell”?
So, have we been wrong all along? Is the quintessential Catholic verse not really “Catholic” after all?
In the last couple minutes he mentions his interpretation is not that of an infallible promise to the Church against the offensive nature of Satan but rather a call to action for the Church against worldly injustice and sin.
Then of course there is Francis Turretin’s blog on the verse in which he, in typical protestant fashion, applies complete spiritualism and says it is about the resurrection of all believers: turretinfan.blogspot.com/2009/04/gates-of-hell-shall-not-prevail-against.html
Both Barron and Turretin, in their critique of the traditional stance provide the compelling reason that gates are not an offensive weapon but are only used defensively in warfare and so how can it be that the Church is being guarded against “the gates of hell”?
So, have we been wrong all along? Is the quintessential Catholic verse not really “Catholic” after all?