Are we slaves inside these bodies?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert_Sock
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

Robert_Sock

Guest
To what degree are we slaves, living inside these wretched bodies? How would we know if somebody planted us here for a selfish purpose? I said it before, but I believe we are ‘meatbots’ (biological robots). And, we are being rescued by God! Imagine that if you will!

These are a part of my deepest beliefs. I really believe in another world that guides and controls our world. From where does technology come? How else could our world grow to over seven billion people without it crashing? Our innate wit is simply too puny to account for all the high tech advances that you see in this world. Heck, please tell me if you have the innate wit to figure out how to mass produce simple boxes of toothpicks. Let me say that none of us have the innate wit to figure out the production process, especially the designing and building of the machines necessary to produce toothpicks? None of us have the innate wit to accomplish this. Now consider how our technology and world advanced so drastically over the past 150 years. Consider having to build the machinery and tooling necessary to produce computer chips. Such engineering feats, again, is far, far beyond our puny innate wit. My suggestion to you is to be humble and listen to this old fool. Go ahead, and try to figure out how to mass produce toothpicks with your puny innate wit!
 
Our bodies are part of us, not just something to be discarded.

God didn’t plant us here for a selfish purpose, He brought us into being because He values us and wants us to love Him as He loves us. He never had to create us. He did so out of love.

The Lord your God is in your midst,
a warrior who gives victory;
he will rejoice over you with gladness,
he will renew you in his love;
he will exult over you with loud singing
as on a day of festival. – Zephaniah 3: 17-18.
 
Our bodies are part of us, not just something to be discarded.

God didn’t plant us here for a selfish purpose, He brought us into being because He values us and wants us to love Him as He loves us. He never had to create us. He did so out of love.

The Lord your God is in your midst,
a warrior who gives victory;
he will rejoice over you with gladness,
he will renew you in his love;
he will exult over you with loud singing
as on a day of festival. – Zephaniah 3: 17-18.
You’re correct in saying that God did not create us for ‘selfish’ reasons, but it’s also clear that something went wrong when Adam and Eve sinned.

And what do you think about my second paragraph? Do you, or anyone you know, have the innate wit necessary to mass produce toothpicks? I encourage you take some time to ponder what it is that I’m trying to get across.
 
You’re correct in saying that God did not create us for ‘selfish’ reasons, but it’s also clear that something went wrong when Adam and Eve sinned.

And what do you think about my second paragraph? Do you, or anyone you know, have the innate wit necessary to mass produce toothpicks? I encourage you take some time to ponder what it is that I’m trying to get across.
The way we got our technology is that over many centuries accumulated knowledge from many different people was put to use. I know it seems like a lot but it doesn’t require another world influencing ours. That sounds too new age for me.
 
The way we got our technology is that over many centuries accumulated knowledge from many different people was put to use. I know it seems like a lot but it doesn’t require another world influencing ours. That sounds too new age for me.
But somebody had to come up with the idea, and implement it. How long do you think it took that person? Some knowledge is accumulated through time, but the machines to manufacture toothpicks are unique, and would needed to have been created in a very short time span. Now take a close look around you and see all the unique technology that is required to manufacture everything over very short time span. Surely these people would need to be plentiful and somebody should be able to point to them out and shake their hands.

I spent a long time at UCLA working on my PhD, and I never met anyone who would have this innate wit. All I ever found was people who could read and write very well. Again, see all the unique items in your house and ask how all of it could have come about over the past 150 years or so.
 
Whooh.

Our bodies do not enslave us, they enable living life!

And since our LORD took on a male human body the same as yours or mine, RS, methinks it behooveth us not to call these poor old somas “wretched.”

I remember your comments about technology from other occasions; I say that technology is human. Indeed, in 100,000 YEARS of human history, it is discouraging that we haven’t gone much farther!

God Bless, ICXC NIKA
 
Whooh.

Our bodies do not enslave us, they enable living life!

And since our LORD took on a male human body the same as yours or mine, RS, methinks it behooveth us not to call these poor old somas “wretched.”

I remember your comments about technology from other occasions; I say that technology is human. Indeed, in 100,000 YEARS of human history, it is discouraging that we haven’t gone much farther!

God Bless, ICXC NIKA
There will be another ‘adventure’ for our souls after the World to Come! Such a view is espoused by Hasidic Jews who contend that just our souls, not our glorified bodies, will be gathered to Gan Eden for the righteous.

You think we should have gone much further? Like, how much further? Can you predict what the world will look like in the future (like 150 years from now)? Why wouldn’t you at least give God the credit? Is it because the mass media doesn’t?

Well, yes, our bodies enable us to live here in this lower world but so what? What does that have to do with my OP? (BTW: The Hasidic Jews believe that there are four worlds that God created, and we are in the lowest)
 
I spent a long time at UCLA working on my PhD, and I never met anyone who would have this innate wit. All I ever found was people who could read and write very well. Again, see all the unique items in your house and ask how all of it could have come about over the past 150 years or so.
where there’s a will there’s a way

obviously there are no intelligent people at UCLA. :rolleyes:

man is a tool making creature. it is part of our nature, part of our innate wit to use your vernacular. once information was made readily available it was easy to put multiple ideas together. The human brain is just as capable 5000 years ago as it is today. The only difference is that we disseminate information faster and more reliably.

You need to read “Connections” by James Burke or watch the show

youtube.com/watch?v=WgOp-nz3lHg
 
where there’s a will there’s a way

obviously there are no intelligent people at UCLA. :rolleyes:

man is a tool making creature. it is part of our nature, part of our innate wit to use your vernacular. once information was made readily available it was easy to put multiple ideas together. The human brain is just as capable 5000 years ago as it is today. The only difference is that we disseminate information faster and more reliably.

You need to read “Connections” by James Burke or watch the show

youtube.com/watch?v=WgOp-nz3lHg
Again, the only intelligence at UCLA is in reading and writing! Reading and writing is a part of our innate wit, but that’s not what the main point of my post was all about; I’m interested in knowing who had the innate wit necessary to propel our world over the past 150 years or so.

You claim that “the human brain is just as capable 5000 years ago as it is today” but so what? You also claim that the only difference is that “we disseminate information faster and more reliably,” but so what again? I’m not sure how either of these facts relate to my main post.
 
There will be another ‘adventure’ for our souls after the World to Come! Such a view is espoused by Hasidic Jews who contend that just our souls, not our glorified bodies, will be gathered to Gan Eden for the righteous.

You think we should have gone much further? Like, how much further? Can you predict what the world will look like in the future (like 150 years from now)? Why wouldn’t you at least give God the credit? Is it because the mass media doesn’t?

Well, yes, our bodies enable us to live here in this lower world but so what? What does that have to do with my OP? (BTW: The Hasidic Jews believe that there are four worlds that God created, and we are in the lowest)
Robert, having read your interesting posts over time, it seems to me your religious beliefs are very much influenced by Hasidic Judaism and consist of one part Hasidism, a second part Catholicism, and a third part your own invention. I’m not being critical of this; you can believe whatever you wish, but is it correct you are not fully in accord with the teachings of Catholicism or Christianity in general?
 
But somebody had to come up with the idea, and implement it.
necessity is the mother of invention… so is greed. If people are looking for a means to get food out of their teeth someone would come up with a tool that does that. They would spend a lot of time and effort using existing tools to make a toothpick that other people would pay good money for.

so what was your point?
 
If we were slaves** to** our bodies we wouldn’t know we were slaves to anything!

Physical objects are not free in any respect.
 
I am just trying to figure out why I would want to mass produce toothpicks ?
 
Robert Sock;10924198:
Quote:
How else could our world grow to over seven billion people without it crashing?
crashing into what? what do you mean by ‘crashing’?
I am not sure about the other aspects of the opening post, but the technology around us is mostly a scaffold or crutch that more and more creates dependency and weakens our natural abilities rather than makes us more capable. Most people living today are less fit, have a lower threshold for pain, have less stamina and are generally less capable of survival (without drugs and technology) than humans were in the past. Longevity does not argue that we are healthier or more fit as individuals, only that we are better protected from the vagaries that would have done us in in past times.
 
I am not sure about the other aspects of the opening post, but the technology around us is mostly a scaffold or crutch that more and more creates dependency and weakens our natural abilities rather than makes us more capable. Most people living today are less fit, have a lower threshold for pain, have less stamina and are generally less capable of survival (without drugs and technology) than humans were in the past. Longevity does not argue that we are healthier or more fit as individuals, only that we are better protected from the vagaries that would have done us in in past times.
Yet that is not a bad thing, since after all staying alive is the goal.

It does no good to be fit/muscular, etc, if you are dead from a stupid skin infection that our current chemical technology can prevent.

The human body is deficient in muscular strength compared to other animals. If human life meets nature on its own terms, it will lose, which is why we developed a mind, and evolved society. Technology is just the extension of this process.

ICXC NIKA
 
Yet that is not a bad thing, since after all staying alive is the goal.

It does no good to be fit/muscular, etc, if you are dead from a stupid skin infection that our current chemical technology can prevent.

The human body is deficient in muscular strength compared to other animals. If human life meets nature on its own terms, it will lose, which is why we developed a mind, and evolved society. Technology is just the extension of this process.

ICXC NIKA
Perhaps. However, where artificial technology weakens natural immunity and bolsters dependency that would seem a cause for concern, no? Similar to the way monoculture in agriculture opens the possibility for devastation because vulnerability to certain threats has become universal within the “culture” of the plant community. The strategy for bolstering security against the threats is to continue to create new means of artificial protection as the threats evolve. Monoculture requires artificial support or it would quickly collapse left to itself. Modern western culture is a kind of monoculture that relies heavily on artificial means to bolster it against threats. Abortion, euthanasia and even same sex marriage would seem to be artificial means of culling back overgrowth, but are signs that we are in trouble because the entire strategy of materialism and economic growth dooms itself by its own success.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top