D
Dan_Daly
Guest
I was reading through the Catholic Dictionary by Donald Attwater (excellent book) and a very interesting question came up.
Under “Simple Vows” it tells us that you can’t take a simple vow until you are past 16 years old, and that a simple vow in most cases makes an act contrary to the vow illict but not invalid (although it does make them invalid in some cases). As a specific example it states that a person with a simple vow to celibacy COULD validly marry, although the marriage would be illicit.
Under “Solemn Vows” it tells us that you have to be 21 years old, and that a solemn vow makes a contrary act invalid. So a person with a solemn vow to celibacy could not possibly be married validly.
So…
What about “wedding vows”? You can get married before 21, so that would seem to eliminate solemn vows. However, once married, you can not validly marry someone else, which would seem to eliminate simple vows. So all that I’m left with is the conclusion that “wedding vows” aren’t really vows at all.
Interesting, huh?
Pax Christi
Under “Simple Vows” it tells us that you can’t take a simple vow until you are past 16 years old, and that a simple vow in most cases makes an act contrary to the vow illict but not invalid (although it does make them invalid in some cases). As a specific example it states that a person with a simple vow to celibacy COULD validly marry, although the marriage would be illicit.
Under “Solemn Vows” it tells us that you have to be 21 years old, and that a solemn vow makes a contrary act invalid. So a person with a solemn vow to celibacy could not possibly be married validly.
So…
What about “wedding vows”? You can get married before 21, so that would seem to eliminate solemn vows. However, once married, you can not validly marry someone else, which would seem to eliminate simple vows. So all that I’m left with is the conclusion that “wedding vows” aren’t really vows at all.
Interesting, huh?
Pax Christi