Are Wednesdays penetential days?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Little_One0307
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
L

Little_One0307

Guest
Hi All,

I was wondering what the deal is with Wednesdays. I know some peeps say that Wednesday is a penetential day like Friday, but is it. And if it was, then why was it dropped from today’s living out our faith?

I know some visionaries in Mejagorge [misspelled atrociuosly I know] say that Wednesdays should be days of fasting as well.

God Bless.

Little One0307
 
Hi All,

I was wondering what the deal is with Wednesdays. I know some peeps say that Wednesday is a penetential day like Friday, but is it. And if it was, then why was it dropped from today’s living out our faith?

I know some visionaries in Mejagorge [misspelled atrociuosly I know] say that Wednesdays should be days of fasting as well.

God Bless.

Little One0307
Wedsndays are no different than any other day unless its a Holy Day.Mejagorge is not confirmed or proved to be true by the CC.Many think its a hoax.
 
All I have to offer in this is that I know that some of the stricter lay orders require fasting (or absence of meat) on Fridays as well as Wednesdays. So there must be some significance to the Wednesday to make them choose this day.
 
Hi All,

I was wondering what the deal is with Wednesdays. I know some peeps say that Wednesday is a penitential day like Friday, but is it. And if it was, then why was it dropped from today’s living out our faith?

I know some visionaries in Mejagorge [misspelled atrociuosly I know] say that Wednesdays should be days of fasting as well.

God Bless.

Little One0307
All I have to offer in this is that I know that some of the stricter lay orders require fasting (or absence of meat) on Fridays as well as Wednesdays. So there must be some significance to the Wednesday to make them choose this day.
I don’t know much about Meja . . . (I can’t spell it either). I do know about Wednesdays.

Fast and abstinence on Wednesdays was introduced in the Latin Church by Francis of Assisi in 1221 when he imposed it on all the friars, the nuns and any lay person that was either a Secular Franciscan or attended a Franciscan chapel. By the 1500s the number of friars and secular Franciscans was well over 500,000. The custom was well accepted in the Church.

St. Francis introduced many customs and traditions to the Catholic Church. This was one of them.

Before people jump up and down that St. Francis was not a pope or even a priest, yes that’s true. However, he made other introductions into the Latin Catholic Church that many people accept and fight if you take it away.
  • Tabernacles on the main altar
  • First Saturdays
  • Christmas Crèche
  • Stations of the Cross as we know them today, not the primitive version
  • Secular Orders
  • Ecumenism
  • Declericalization of religious life
  • Autonomy for women religious
  • Vernacular hymns in liturgy
  • The mother form of the current EF mass
  • Monastery without a cloister
  • Recitation of the Divine Office instead of chanting
  • Living nativity
  • Preferential option for the poor
  • Custody of the Holy Land
This is another one of those customs that never became the universal law, but became a common practice for many centuries and is still practiced by Regular and Secular Franciscans.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
And Brother J.R. proves once again what a BAMF he is. 😉 Nice answer!
 
And Brother J.R. proves once again what a BAMF he is. 😉 Nice answer!
I have no idea what a BAMF is, but I hope it’s good. :rotfl:

After many years of studying Francis’ life, his writings, teachings, what has been written about him, his theology and his ecclesiology and spending almost the same number of years teaching Franciscans studies, I have never found anything in his writings or those of the people who knew him as to why Wednesday I have three theories, but have been unable to prove or disprove any of them.

First: He may have gotten the idea from Ash Wednesday, which in those days was a major holy day. Just as we perpetuate Good Friday by making all Fridays a day of penance, Wednesdays may have held the same meaning to him.

Second: There were a number of penitential movements during his time. His was not the first. He may have learned this from the Albagensians, who were later condemned for heresy, but not for this particular practice. Though we don’t know for sure if this is one of their practices.

Third: Francis was a great admirer of the Benedictines, though he tried to get as far away as he could from many of their practices, such as chanting the Hours, cloisters and much of the structure of the monastic life, because he found it to be confining, he did carry many of their practices into the world, creating a movement that had strong monastic qualities, without the external trappings of monastic life. The Benedictines did have many days of abstinence built into their structure.

It may have been that all of the above influenced each other. However, it was Francis who took this and other ascetical practices outside of the cloister. One has to understand what it meant to him, if one is to engage in it productively.

For Francis of Assisi, asceticism was not something that one did because it was a rule, to weed out vices, or to comply with rules and regulations. He was not a man who was very attentive to tradition. He probably would not be very welcome on this forum. Francis heard a higher calling. That was to become a living duplicate of Christ.

We have to understand how he sees Christ, which is a little different from how many of us see him. In fact, Francis’ spirituality was more Eastern than Latin. He saw Christ as the one who revealed the Father through the power of the Holy Spirit. His spirituality is very Trinitarian and transcendent at the same time that it’s incarnational. God is both here and in eternity. To love God, one must become as poor as God. God is simple. Poverty is an end, not a means to an end. When one achieves perfect poverty, one has become like Christ; therefore, becoming one with the Father as Christ is one with the Father. This is only possible through the work of the Holy Spirit. Fasting and abstinence strip one of one’s attachment to self.

In the end, fasting and abstinence are a means of living the first beatitude and a means of becoming like Christ Crucified who says, “I thirst.” One becomes totally poor, because the Crucified Christ is poor. Only by becoming the Crucified Christ can one achieve union with the Father. Only then can Francis say like Christ, “Father, into your hands I commend my spirit.”

This was the goal of his life and the goal that he sets for his brothers, nuns and seculars, to become so like Christ that we can commend our spirits to the Father and be united to him as the Son is united to him, thus fulfilling Christ’s wish that we remain in his love and Paul’s admonition that we conform to Christ crucified.

Fasting and abstinence, in the Franciscan tradition goes beyond atoning for sin. It is an act of union with Christ that leads to union with the Father and it is motivated and sustained by the grace that one receives from the Holy Spirit.

It is profoundly Trinitarian and mystical. Fasting and abstinence unites the ascetic and the mystic. On the one hand there is the sinner who joins Christ on the cross to atone for humanity’s sins. However, it also goes further. It unites the individual to Christ who liberates himself from everything, including his humanity, in order to surrender his spirit to the Father who awaits with open arms.

Fasting and abstinence are one single act of atonement and liberation, when through the grace of the Holy Spirit, it seeks to be Christ who atones and goes to the Father once he has experienced thirst. This becomes very clear to us in the Office of the Passion, which is an addendum to the Divine Office that Francis wrote for his followers, secular and regular. His choice of psalms and the prayers that he writes speak to us of this vision that he has.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
If fasting on Wednesdays was introduced by St Francis, as described by Br JR, then that might explain the connection with Medjugorje - there were several Franciscan friars involved in the promoting the alleged apparations and the movement. I believe that at least one of them has been dismissed from the order.
 
In the Byzantine tradition, Wednesday is a day of penitence, because it was on a Wednesday that Judas took the silver in agreement to betray our Lord. Also, the Didache instructs the faithful to fast on Wednesdays and Fridays, as opposed the Jewish practice of fasting on Mondays and Thursdays.
 
In the Byzantine tradition, Wednesday is a day of penitence, because it was on a Wednesday that Judas took the silver in agreement to betray our Lord. Also, the Didache instructs the faithful to fast on Wednesdays and Fridays, as opposed the Jewish practice of fasting on Mondays and Thursdays.
The Eastern influence on St. Francis is not to be ignored. He certainly introduces many Eastern customs into his order and not all of them Catholic, some were Eastern Catholic and some were Islamic. He greatly admired the piety and asceticism of the East, while he condemned the violence and the obstinacy between East and West, and Catholic and Muslim. He had a knowledge of the Fathers that he could not explain. Many mystics have infused knowledge. That would explain his familiarity with Eastern spirituality and theology.
If fasting on Wednesdays was introduced by St Francis, as described by Br JR, then that might explain the connection with Medjugorje - there were several Franciscan friars involved in the promoting the alleged apparations and the movement. I believe that at least one of them has been dismissed from the order.
I thought about this when I first read that this was part of the messages of Medjugorje. There was more than one dismissal. The bishop had asked for something and his orders were questioned. Franciscans may never question an order from legitimate authority, even if they believe the order to be wrong. That’s enough to get you dismissed and excommunicated. Franciscans and Dominicans have a very different take on obedience. Franciscan: obey without questioning. Dominican: obey and ask for understanding after the fact. Both Holy Fathers: Dominic and Francis, did not tolerate this notion that one has to “think” before one obeys. Unless you’re being asked to do something that the Church condemns, you must obey.

I don’t believe that any of the friars were seers. But they were in charge of the shrine. It is possible that their custom influenced the people involved.
Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
For those of us who follow the old calendar, while no longer binding, we are reminded that the Ember Days are observed four times a year on Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday. But Wednesdays have never been a day of weekly obligatory penitential observance in the Latin Rite that I know of.
 
For those of us who follow the old calendar, while no longer binding, we are reminded that the Ember Days are observed four times a year on Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday. But Wednesdays have never been a day of weekly obligatory penitential observance in the Latin Rite that I know of.
Since we have never followed the Roman Calendar, I wouldn’t know about that. It sounds right, because I don’t know anyone else besides monks and Franciscans doing this. This has always included the laity associated with the Franciscan family, either because they’re Secular Franciscans or because they belong to a Franciscan parish. However, for those who are not professed, it’s a custom, not a law.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
I found this great website that explains the long tradition of fasting in the Catholic Church. It seems many saints did set aside Wednesdays and Fridays for doing penance. Here are a couple of quotes from the saints. It must be remembered that fasting on bread and water alone is considered a severe penance. If you wish to undertake this type of fasting you have to get permission from your spiritual director of confessor because it can lead to pride.

religious-vocation.com/fasting_religious_renewal.html

Saint Faustina, 1938: “On three days a week, Wednesday, Friday and Saturday, there will be a strict fast [on bread and water]…During the two great fasts, ember days and vigils, the food will consists of a piece of bread and some water, once a day.” Saint Faustina outlined a detailed prescription for fasting for the new community she founded. The saint often asked permission from her superiors to fast on bread and water.

Saint Francis De Sales: “The early Christians selected Wednesday, Friday and Saturday as days of abstinence. …] The ancient monks, as St. Jerome relates, thought it a great defect to make use of food dressed with fire. Their daily sustenance consisted of a pound of bread. St Aloysius, though always sickly, fasted three times in the week on bread and water. St. Francis Xavier during his missions was satisfied each day with a few grains of toasted rice. St. John Francis Regis, in the great fatigues of his missions took no other food than a little flour steeped in water. The daily support of St. Peter of Alcantara was but a small quantity of broth. We read in the life of the Venerable Brother John Joseph of the Cross, who lived in our own days, and with whom I was intimately acquainted, that for twenty-four years he fasted very often on bread and water, and never ate anything but bread and a little herbs or fruit. When commanded, on account of his infirmities, to use warm food, he took only bread dipped in broth. When the physician ordered him to take a little wine, he mixed it with his broth to increase the insipidity of his scanty repast. … I do not mean to say, that to attain sanctity it is necessary for nuns to imitate these examples; but I assert that whoever is attached to the pleasures of the table, or does not seriously attend to the mortification of the appetite, will never make any considerable progress in perfection. In religious communities there are generally several meals in the day: hence, they who neglect the mortification of the taste will daily commit a thousand faults.”
 
I found this great website that explains the long tradition of fasting in the Catholic Church. It seems many saints did set aside Wednesdays and Fridays for doing penance. Here are a couple of quotes from the saints. It must be remembered that fasting on bread and water alone is considered a severe penance. If you wish to undertake this type of fasting you have to get permission from your spiritual director of confessor because it can lead to pride.

religious-vocation.com/fasting_religious_renewal.html

Saint Faustina, 1938: “On three days a week, Wednesday, Friday and Saturday, there will be a strict fast [on bread and water]…During the two great fasts, ember days and vigils, the food will consists of a piece of bread and some water, once a day.” Saint Faustina outlined a detailed prescription for fasting for the new community she founded. The saint often asked permission from her superiors to fast on bread and water.

Saint Francis De Sales: “The early Christians selected Wednesday, Friday and Saturday as days of abstinence. …] The ancient monks, as St. Jerome relates, thought it a great defect to make use of food dressed with fire. Their daily sustenance consisted of a pound of bread. St Aloysius, though always sickly, fasted three times in the week on bread and water. St. Francis Xavier during his missions was satisfied each day with a few grains of toasted rice. St. John Francis Regis, in the great fatigues of his missions took no other food than a little flour steeped in water. The daily support of St. Peter of Alcantara was but a small quantity of broth. We read in the life of the Venerable Brother John Joseph of the Cross, who lived in our own days, and with whom I was intimately acquainted, that for twenty-four years he fasted very often on bread and water, and never ate anything but bread and a little herbs or fruit. When commanded, on account of his infirmities, to use warm food, he took only bread dipped in broth. When the physician ordered him to take a little wine, he mixed it with his broth to increase the insipidity of his scanty repast. … I do not mean to say, that to attain sanctity it is necessary for nuns to imitate these examples; but I assert that whoever is attached to the pleasures of the table, or does not seriously attend to the mortification of the appetite, will never make any considerable progress in perfection. In religious communities there are generally several meals in the day: hence, they who neglect the mortification of the taste will daily commit a thousand faults.”
This is pretty much what I had posted before. If you notice, it begins with the ancient monks and then there is big gap and the next people to be mentioned are the saints of the Renaissance. For some reason this custom did not get out of the monastery until the Middle Ages. However, because most of the penitential movements of the time were condemned as heretics, they did not make much progress in promoting this practice among the laity until Francis of Assisi founded his lay movement, which was the first secular order in the Church and also the first lay (non-order) movement not to be condemned as heretic. Then this practice takes off and spreads through Europe.

However, we know that this came from the ancient monks of the East and catches on in the west. We’re not sure if it’s Jerome himself who brought it to the West or if he was part of this monastic movement. We do know that the custom was common in Benedictine abbeys.

Along with fasting and abstinence on Wednesdays and Fridays, Francis of Assisi borrowed from Eastern cultures and instituted the three Lents. These were days of continuous fasting except Sundays, solemnities or when a brother was sick, then everyone had to eat. These Lents were: Ash Wed to Good Fri, the Feast of St. Michael to the Feast of St. Martin and 40 days before Christmas.

However, in the Franciscan tradition, fasting was never reduced to bread and water. It was always one meal per day of whatever was available. Francis made it very clear that it was a sin to refuse what what placed before you. Even on fast and abstinence days, if someone showed you charity and gave you a good meal, you are to eat it as an act of charity toward the person and an act of thanksgiving to God. Sacrificing the body is only one dimension of fasting. One sacrifices the body to be like Christ who thirsts on the cross. Therefore, like Christ who ate with sinners, we honor those who are charitable to us by accepting their table. We must remain focused on imitating Christ as literally as possible. This was Francis’ teaching when he spoke of fasting and abstinence on Fridays, Mondays and during the Lents.

St. Francis de Sales teaches the same thing in Introduction to the Devout Life . The above quote is part of what he said. There was more. That statement alone makes it sound as if he was condemning religious for having three meals a day. That was not what he was saying. He was pointing in the same direction as the early Fathers, the early monks, and St. Francis. St. Francis de Sales points to the importance of being like Christ. To do this, one must learn discipline, because Christ is a disciplined person.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Hi All,

Evening. I wanted to say first and foremost thanks for posting your replies. I really appreciate reading the responses.

Wow, I did not know that St. Francis did all that. I have always thought that the Franciscan * Order was a great one and a very beautiful one. I love the spirituality.

I noticed that Ember Days were mentioned. I was going to ask how do you figure out what the Ember Days are and what they were?

As to Mejagorgie [dang it, I hate spelling lol :mad: man big words for such a little minded person at this time of night] was considered to be a hoax. So does the Church leave that open to believe in if one choosees to believe in it? Or what should one do regarding that?

Sry if the thread gets derailed but you guys raised some interesting points.

Rowofvoices thanks for the website. It was most helpful.

God bless all you guys and have a wonderful Memorial Day weekend.

Little One0307*
 
Hi All,

Evening. I wanted to say first and foremost thanks for posting your replies. I really appreciate reading the responses.

Wow, I did not know that St. Francis did all that. I have always thought that the Franciscan * Order was a great one and a very beautiful one. I love the spirituality.

I noticed that Ember Days were mentioned. I was going to ask how do you figure out what the Ember Days are and what they were?

As to Mejagorgie [dang it, I hate spelling lol :mad: man big words for such a little minded person at this time of night] was considered to be a hoax. So does the Church leave that open to believe in if one choosees to believe in it? Or what should one do regarding that?

Sry if the thread gets derailed but you guys raised some interesting points.

Rowofvoices thanks for the website. It was most helpful.

God bless all you guys and have a wonderful Memorial Day weekend.

Little One0307*

Francis of Assisi introduced many things to Catholicism that most people don’t know. Other things were already in place, but were not common. They were often reserved to monks. Francis did two things. He introduces some new customs and practices and he draws out ancient ones that have been hidden in monasteries and away from the lay faithful.

He had no intention of causing a revolution. He simply felt that the monastery was a confining space in which he could not become Christ-like. Therefore, he sets out to take the monastic life on the road, in a manner of speaking. That’s how friars come to have many things in common with monks, while we also have the freedom to roam around. In that roaming around, the lay people who followed the friars and those who later followed the Secular Franciscan Order, which is a separate order that Francis founded, not part of the friars, picked up many customs that until that time had been practiced in monasteries and by canons in cathedrals. That’s why we consider the Franciscan movement a popular movement, whereas the Dominican movement was a scholastic one. The two, when they worked together, were a force to be reckoned with.

As to M (I can’t spell that name either), it’s still under investigation. No one is encouraged or discouraged from believing it. What has been discouraged are the pilgrimages. This was a decision of the local bishop. As far as I know, the Vatican is simply supporting the bishop’s demand that this be studied more closely. It is not taking sides. This has been the case with all claims of apparitions. The Vatican tries to say out of it and let the local bishops deal with it. Some were never proven true and others were proven worthy of belief.

No claim is ever proven false or 100% true. It’s like going to court. You’re never proven innocent. You just can’t be proven guilty . . . so you get off with “Not guilty.” In these cases the claims can end up as “worthy of belief” or “unsubstantiated”, unless it’s a real hoax or fraud that you can prove. Then it stands to reason that you call it what it is.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
He had no intention of causing a revolution. He simply felt that the monastery was a confining space in which he could not become Christ-like. Therefore, he sets out to take the monastic life on the road, in a manner of speaking. That’s how friars come to have many things in common with monks, while we also have the freedom to roam around. In that roaming around, the lay people who followed the friars and those who later followed the Secular Franciscan Order, which is a separate order that Francis founded, not part of the friars, picked up many customs that until that time had been practiced in monasteries and by canons in cathedrals. That’s why we consider the Franciscan movement a popular movement, whereas the Dominican movement was a scholastic one. The two, when they worked together, were a force to be reckoned with.
So can I say that St. Francis was the first religious that was active? Do you know when the active orders began?

I am not really familiar with the Dominicans, if I am reading you right, are they like the Franciscans in their rules?

Thanks. I know posting long posts can be time consuming. I appreciate you sharing your knowledge.

Little One0307
 
So can I say that St. Francis was the first religious that was active? Do you know when the active orders began?

I am not really familiar with the Dominicans, if I am reading you right, are they like the Franciscans in their rules?

Thanks. I know posting long posts can be time consuming. I appreciate you sharing your knowledge.

Little One0307
Long before the existence of the Franciscans there were the Augustinians. The Augustinians were religious. They were canons. Most of them were priests who were attached to cathedrals. Their function was to serve the pastoral needs of the local people and to live a life that was very similar to that of monks: common chanting of the Divine Office, common meals, periods of silence and study. These were really the first active religious. Many religious communities took the Rule of St. Augustine because it allowed them to be actively involved in ministry and at the same time it provides a monastic structure for their day and their government. The Dominicans are one of the many orders who follow the Rule of St. Augustine. They are actually a year older than the Franciscans.

The difference between the Dominicans and Franciscans has to do with the priesthood. Dominicans are an order of preachers, hence the letters OP after their name. They are the Order of Brother Preachers. Because they were to be preachers, at mass and outside of mass, they had to be priests.

Franciscans are a family of men and women who see ourselves as a brotherhood. Francis never required the priesthood He was not a priest. Nor did he require all of his followers to be celibate and to live in religious houses. The largest of the Franciscan order is made up of married men and women who have children and form fraternities that gather for apostolic work, study, prayer, fellowship and take care of each other as well as those around them. We refer to them as Secular Franciscans. They are about 600,000 today.

Then there are the friars. We are divided into groups called obediences. Each group is headed by a General Minister who is the legitimate successor of St. Francis. These communities of friars all follow the same rule of life that Francis wrote for us. We differ from each other in those areas that are not included in the rule. For example, some are very involved in education, others in parish work, others in outreach to the poor, others are hermits, others are itinerant preachers, others work in internal ministries serving the Franciscan family.

We also have an order of nuns, known as the Poor Clares in honor of the first Franciscan nun and the woman whom we consider to be the Mother of the Franciscan family, St. Clare of Assisi. They are autonomous. Francis did not want women to be submissive to men. This was abhorrent to him. In any case, this was the first order of women that did not answer to male authority, except to the local bishop. There was an agreement between Francis and Clare. The friars would not interfere in the affairs of the nuns, but the nuns would not demand that the friars celebrate the sacraments for them, visit them, protect them, finance them, or take care of them in any way. Whatever the friars gave to them was of their free choosing and whatever they accepted from the friars was of their choosing. They were on equal footing. This relationship of brothers and sisters, instead of fathers and daughters, exists to this day.

Lastly, there came the sisters. The sisters are not nuns. They dress like nuns. They are called sister, but they make simple vows, not solemn vows. They are active in outside apostolates from teaching to caring for the poor. The first sisters came from the Secular Franciscans when some Secular Franciscan women who were unwed united to take care of the sick during some plague in Europe. Later, St. John Neumann of Philadelphia would ask the sisters to send one or two to train American women to care for the sick and to teach. That’s how the American Franciscan Sisters began.

We do have many brothers who are priests. They are often called brother-priests or friar-priests or simply, the clerics. They are seen as having a vocation within a vocation. They are brothers who serve their brothers and sisters in the family and in the Church through the priesthood. So they never cease to be brothers and they occupy no special place in the community. However, they are very much loved. In some places they are not even called Father. They are called Friar or Brother.

Among the Dominicans, as I understand it and someone who knows them better can help me here, there are two vocations. The Dominican priest is one and the Dominican brother is another. Both are equally Dominican, but the brothers are coadjutors. They make things work so that the Fathers can go out and preach. We have some brothers who remain inside and take care of the house and grounds. But we have many non-ordained brothers who run missions, are parish administrators in mission countries and places where there are no priests. Some are theologians, spiritual directors, superiors or formators and even serve on the general council of the order. It’s not two vocations, but one vocation. You are called to be a son or daughter of St. Francis.

What is very strong among Franciscans is our passion for St. Francis. He is always considered The Seraphic Father or The Holy Father. From the day that you become a postulant in any of the Franciscan branches you are told that you come to follow Christ by walking in the footsteps of St. Francis. Francis is like the ruler by which you measure your progress in the spiritual life.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Thanks for the explanation. I look forward to reading your other posts as they pop up on the forum.

God bless.

Little One0307
 
Dear Friends,

Wednesdays and Fridays were prescribed days of strict fasting by Canon 69 of the Holy Apostles and were observed by the universal Catholic Church in the first millennium. These days are still so observed in the Christian East. It would be good if the Western Church returned to this ancient tradition as well! 😉

Here is a treatise on it:

Concerning Fasting on Wednesday and Friday
An Excerpt from Exomologetarion (A Manual of Confession)
by St. Nikodemos the Hagiorite
Canon 69 of the Holy Apostles designates that any hierarch or priest or deacon or subdeacon or reader or chanter who does not fast during Great Lent and Wednesday and Friday is to be deposed. If a layperson does not fast during these times (unless he cannot fast on account of bodily illness), he is to be excommunicated. Do you see how the Apostles numbered the Wednesday and Friday fast together with the fast of Great Lent? Therefore, just as the fast of Great Lent consists in the eating of dry foods, namely, to eat but once a day, at the ninth hour, without consuming oil or wine, likewise, the fast of Wednesday and Friday is to be conducted in the exact same manner. St. Epiphanios also says: “We fast on Wednesday and Friday until the ninth hour.”[16] Likewise, Philostorgios says that the fast of Wednesday and Friday does not consist in the abstention from meat, but it designates that one is not to eat any food until the evening.[17] St. Benedict (Canon 41) also designates that the fast of Wednesday and Friday is until the ninth hour. And Balsamon forbids the consumption of shellfish on Wednesday and Friday just as during Great Lent. Let us therefore stop insensibly thinking that the fast of Wednesday and Friday is not an Apostolic directive, for behold, the Apostles in their Canons number this fast together with that of Great Lent, and in the Apostolic Constitutions they number it together with the fast of Holy Week, saying:

“One must fast during Holy Week and Wednesday and Friday.”[18] But why should I say that this regulation is only of the Apostles? It is a regulation of Christ Himself, for this is what the Apostles say in Book V, ch. 14 of the Constitutions:

“He (that is, Christ) commanded us to fast on Wednesday and Friday.”[19] We therefore fast on these days according to the Holy Hieromartyr Peter (Canon 15): “On Wednesday because on this day the council of the Jews was gathered to betray our Lord; on Friday because on this day He suffered death for our salvation.” The divine Jerome says the same thing.

Therefore, because the fast of Great Lent is equal to the fast of Wednesday and Friday it follows that, for those who are sick or weak, the relaxation of the fast is also to be equal during these fasts. For this reason, as Canons 8 and 10 of Timothy allow a woman who is pregnant during the Great Fast to consume as much wine and food as is necessary for her condition, this also applies to the fast of Wednesday and Friday. The same holds for those who have become weak from excessive sickness, that is, they are allowed to consume oil and wine during these fasting periods. So says the divine Jerome: “The fast of Wednesday and Friday is not to be broken unless there is great necessity.” The divine Augustine says the same.[20]

.
 
Hi,

Wow. Yeah I totally agree. I am trying to do something on Wednesdays myself, but I keep forgetting and so it is starting to become a habit.

That Great Fast sounds pretty hard. Is this what is referred to as the Black Fast as well? Does the Eastern Church still do this?

God Bless

Little One0307
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top