The modern clergy and liturgy doesn’t really promote masculine involvement. For better or for worse, the way God is spoken of and worshipped in the modern world largely seems designed for women.
Though there is something to be said that the women of Christ’s time always seemed to be a little more willing to accept Him as He was.
I agree with your premise that worship is directed towards women, but I don’t think this is a modern issue per say. It’s a long standing underlying issue, but only one in which has become problematic since the factors that previouly propped it up have since fallen away.
Historically there has long been greater numbers of female religious (nuns, consecrated virgins, parish workers etc) than men, but men had greater rewards and secular motivations to consider a vocation (wealth, political power etc).
Within Christianity men are called to fall desperatley in love with God…as a male. There’s an unusual phenomena documented in a book called
The Eternal Child which noted through the authors research that within Christianity (not merely Catholicism) it wasn’t just women more likely to be religious, but same sex attracted males were more likely to be than heterosexual men. It was also noted that same sex attracted women were also interestingly noted to be less religious as well. It works in reverse as well, in India the Goddesses Shakti and Kali are unlike other popular Gods (Vishnu, Shiva etc) in that they are among the very few cults in which the majority of worshipers are males.
I’m not suggesting anyone is sexually attracted to Jesus, but rather the whole vocabulary and doctrine (God loves you, sacred heart, divine mercy etc) at the time borrows heavily from the vocabulary of romantic love, the Catholic Church especially does in this regard because it claims to be the literal bride of Christ. The body of believers is styled in the feminine sense and betrothed to a God who is very male, so insistent upon his maleness in fact one requires the correct genitalia to act in his person.
In a world with less motivation or reward for embracing a religious life, this factor comes to the fore in a way that didn’t matter as much when there were other factors that made it more appealing. The Church hasn’t suddenly become effeminate, in some respects the language always has been geared this way.