Are you a Liberal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pax_et_Caritas
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A liberal Catholic does not accept one bit of the Church’s teaching based on the infallibility of the Church but on their own analysis of theology and therefore their agreement with the Church. This is exactly the absolute independence of the individual which as at the heart of liberalism.

From Liberalism Is a Sin, Ch. 7:
"Strange as may seem that anomaly called Liberal Catholicism, its reason is not far to seek. It takes its root in a false conception of the nature of the act of faith. The Liberal Catholic assumes as the formal motive of the act of faith, not the infallible authority of God revealing supernatural truth, but his own reason deigning to accept as true what appears rational to him according to the appreciation and measure of his own individual judgment. He subjects God’s authority to the scrutiny of his reason, and not his reason to God’s authority. He accepts Revelation, not on account of the infallible Revealer, but because of the “infallible” receiver. With him the individual judgment is the rule of faith. He believes in the independence of reason. It is true he accepts the Magisterium of the Church, yet he does not accept it as the sole authorized expounder of divine truth. He reserves, as a coefficient factor in the determination of that truth, his own private judgment. The true sense of revealed doctrine to him is not always certain, and human reason therefore has something to say in the matter, as for instance, the limits of the Church’s infallibility may be determined by human science.

…]

The Liberal Catholic calls himself a Catholic because he firmly believes Catholicity to be the veritable revelation of the Son of God; he calls himself a Liberal Catholic because he believes that no one can impose upon him any belief which his individual judgment does not measure as perfectly rational. What is not rational he rejects; he is intellectually free to accept or reject. What appears good he assents to, but he is intellectually bound to no one. Thus, unwittingly, he falls an easy victim to the snare set by the devil for the intellectually proud. He has substituted the naturalistic principle of free examination for the supernatural principle of faith. As a consequence, he is really not Christian, but pagan. He has no real supernatural faith, but only a simple human conviction. In the acceptance of the principle that the individual reason is thus free to believe or not to believe, Liberal Catholics are deluded into the notion that incredulity is a virtue rather than a vice. They fail to see in it an infirmity of the understanding, a voluntary blindness of the heart, and a consequent weakness of will. On the other hand, they look upon the skeptical attitude as a legitimate condition wherein intellectual freedom is preserved, the skeptic remaining master of himself to believe or deny. They have a horror of any coercive element in matters of faith; any chastisement of error shocks their tender susceptibilities, and they detest any Catholic legislation in the direction of what they are pleased to call intolerance.
And from Scheeben’s Dogmatik, Concil, III, 232:
"[The Liberal] measures divine and Catholic faith with the standard of human faith; he regards it, consequently, as an act of free trust and sovereign approbation whereby one accepts and makes his own a truth that is seen to be sufficiently attested. The testimony of another appears to him as authority only insofar as he allows himself freely to be influenced and moved by it; but it is not authority in the sense that the testimony, as an imperious, absolutely binding judgment, necessitates him to an obedient acceptance of its content. According to, this theory, faith, insofar as it is referred formally to the word of God as to its source, is not an act of obedience and submissive homage, but the simple acknowledgment that God has spoken the truth."
SFD
 
The meaning of liberal and conservative, as political terms, changes with every generation and political movement.
How true. I was thinking or the example of a Republican president that unconstitutional suspends habeas corpus and imprisons American citizens as enemy combatants as he wages a war without a declaration from Congress, as required by the Constitution, all because he believes the ends justifies the means.

I am referring to the first Republican president, not the latest.

Honest Abe Lincoln is not what anyone would call a conservative, but 150 years later, things seem to have revolved 180 degrees.
 
Honest Abe Lincoln is not what anyone would call a conservative, but 150 years later, things seem to have revolved 180 degrees.
Sort of reached the point where you have liberals running against one another, it seems. They all want to spend other’s money, whether they have to tax you, borrow to get it, or even print it themselves.

But I shouldn’t complain, I reap the benefits. However, I’ll draw the line at the liturgy. I prefer the EF, so whatever that makes me, I am.
 
I think to answer either yes or no, my first question would be, “In what period of time are you talking about?”
Prayers & blessings
Deacon Ed B
 
Help me out, here…Aren’t liberals mostly militant pro-gay rights, gay marriage, fetal stem cell harvesting, abortion and birth control.

How is that Christ like???
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top